Skip to Content

FCC: Wireless Carriers Violated Federal Law by Sharing Consumer Location Data

One or more wireless carriers violated federal law by failing to protect sensitive customer information like real-time data location, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai confirmed today in letters sent to Congress as part of a wireless location investigation [PDF].

As noted by Bloomberg, Pai's letter comes after the U.S. Committee on Energy and Commerce in November accused the FCC of "failing in its duty to to enforce the laws Congress passed to protect consumers' privacy."

uscarriersfcc
The accusation was referring to major wireless carriers disclosing real-time consumer location information to third-party data services, with data services then selling that sensitive info to a variety of companies without customer consent.

The location selling practices surfaced last year after Motherboard reported that Sprint, AT&T, and T-Mobile were selling subscriber geolocation data to third-party companies like LocationSmart and Zumigo, with those companies then passing it along to bounty hunters, bail bondsmen, and more.

The FCC's letter confirms that one or more wireless carriers violated the law by sharing location data with third-party services, though it does not specify which carriers have done so. Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile have all been questioned about their data selling practices in the past.

Pai says that he's committed to ensuring that carriers comply with the Communications Act and the FCC's rules, and the carriers that have been found in violation of the law could be facing fines.

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...

Top Rated Comments

justperry Avatar
80 months ago

Only hope these wireless carriers get a massive fine.
Problem is, they only raise prices...again.

Losing their license after not complying with laws would go much farther.

-----

1st time: get a warning
2nd time: fine of 10% of annual [S]profit[/S] revenue
3rd time: fine of 50% of annual [S]profit[/S] revenue
4th time: fine of 100% of annual [S]profit[/S] revenue
5th time: lose license
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Doctor Q Avatar
80 months ago

You said it, that was my very first thought. The fine has to hurt in order for it to bring about a change in behavior. A $25,000,000 fine would just a rounding error for some of those companies.
I think a $1000 fine would be enough. Just make sure it's applied per customer per day.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
80 months ago

Only hope these wireless carriers get a massive fine.

Problem is, they only raise prices...again.

Losing their license after not complying with laws would go much farther.

-----

1st time: get a warning
2nd time: fine of 10% of annual profit
3rd time: fine of 50% of annual profit
4th time: fine of 100% of annual profit
5th time: lose license
I would also add prison terms for executives.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
80 months ago
So where do I sign up for the law suite?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
I7guy Avatar
80 months ago
Only hope these wireless carriers get a massive fine.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
luvbug Avatar
80 months ago
Any fine will be a tiny fraction of what they already made from selling the data, which is why our "government regulators" have no sway over what big business is doing (because they don't intend to; it's just a game).

Who, me? I'm no cynic!
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)