Apple Sued Over Listing Memoji as One of Its Registered Trademarks Despite Ongoing Legal Battle [Updated]

Atlanta-based company Social Technologies LLC today filed a lawsuit against Apple that accuses the iPhone maker of falsely indicating that it holds the federal registration for the trademark Memoji in the United States.

Apple has included MEMOJI® in its U.S. trademark list on its website since June 2019, with the ® symbol signifying a federally registered trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, despite the federal registration for the trademark belonging to Social Technologies LLC and not Apple.

Of note, Apple has successfully registered the Memoji trademark in some countries outside the United States, and several foreign countries also use ® to indicate that a mark is registered in that country, but fine print on Apple's website says its list is for trademarks and service marks in the United States.

apple memoji
Memoji is the name of Apple's personalized emoji feature for iPhone and iPad, introduced as part of iOS 12 at WWDC 2018. Apple has applied for two trademarks for the feature with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, but both are currently suspended due to ongoing litigation with Social Technologies LLC.

Social Technologies LLC offers an Android app named Memoji on the Google Play store, which it describes as "the world's best messaging app that will capture the facial expression of the end user with full-motion capabilities, and transpose the image into a custom, personalized emoji of the users actual face."

Social Technologies LLC already sued Apple for trademark infringement in September 2018, and alleges that Apple even unsuccessfully tried to purchase the rights to its then intent-to-use application in April 2016, yet Apple proceeded to add MEMOJI® to its trademark list in June 2019.

An excerpt from the complaint filed with a U.S. federal court in New York:

Social Tech visited Apple's Trademark List1 on June 17, 2019, a day before the deposition of Mr. Thomas La Perle, Apple's Senior Director of Copyright and Trademark in connection with Plaintiff's trademark infringement action against Apple in the Northern District of California. As of that date—June 17, 2019—MEMOJI was not listed on Apple's Trademark List.

However, immediately following Mr. La Perle's deposition, the Trademark List was updated to include the falsely designated MEMOJI® mark. On information and belief, Mr. La Perle orchestrated a scheme to undermine Social Tech's registered trademark rights and mislead the public by causing Apple to add the falsely designated mark to Apple’s Trademark List.

Social Technologies LLC is seeking an injunction to prohibit Apple from using the ® symbol in connection with Memoji, as well as an award of monetary damages and legal fees. The small company also wants a declaration that it owns the only federally registered Memoji trademark.

Update - Oct 1: Apple has replaced MEMOJI® with Memoji™ in its trademark list.

The full complaint, sent to us by law firm Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP, is embedded below.

Top Rated Comments

bodonnell202 Avatar
26 months ago
Well if I'm reading this right Memoji is a registered trademark of Social Technologies LLC and Apple does not have the right to use that trademark (in the US at least?) without purchasing the rights from Social Technologies LLC (or purchasing Social Technologies LLC). Apple's actions here appear to be indefensible.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Khedron Avatar
26 months ago
Surely no one can defend Apple's false advertising, breaking of federal law, and IP theft...
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
QuarterSwede Avatar
26 months ago

Just buy the company Apple, be done.
Apparently they tried:
[Social Technologies LLC] alleges that Apple even unsuccessfully tried to purchase the rights to its then intent-to-use application in April 2016
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ZMacintosh Avatar
26 months ago

Apparently they tried:

Well if I'm reading this right Memoji is a registered trademark of Social Technologies LLC and Apple does not have the right to use that trademark (in the US at least?) without purchasing the rights from Social Technologies LLC (or purchasing Social Technologies LLC). Apple's actions here appear to be indefensible.

If true, Apple has to stand to the law. That’s utterly important for it’s own credibility.
From the registration sequence they registered MEmoji (social tech llc) in 2017 with an intent to use but did not submit anything showing its use, it was about to be abandoned and Apple registered theirs during this time and then finally Social Tech LLC provided specimens once Apples gained traction, so they obviously were looking to score some $. To their advantage they registered the mark first...so Apple now has to prove its not a conflict or come to some agreement. I dont really think Apple has ill intent but the other company clear is expecting to suck some $$ out of apple.

*edit actually some company Lucky Bunny registered it first and Apples trademarks look to be referring to that initial application as they may have purchase the rights to that, so technically Apple would have first usage, however SocialTech's mark registered and the original registration is dead..so it should be interesting
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Carnegie Avatar
26 months ago
I don't know why Apple listed Memoji as a registered trademark, at least without changing the fine print referred to in the OP which would suggest that it's a U.S. trademark registration. Maybe that was an error.

That said, the broader dispute is more complicated than some here might realize and than Social Technologies might want people to believe. Here's a rough timeline of the situation.

Another party applied for a trademark registration based on the word Memoji in 2014, claiming a first commercial use in 2014. That application was eventually abandoned, but it's still relevant here.

Despite that earlier application, Social Technologies claimed that it came up with the word Memoji in 2016 and it, also in 2016, applied for a trademark registration based on its intent to use the mark.

Social Technologies hadn't yet used the mark, and the mark hadn't yet been registered, when Apple announced a new feature - named Memoji - in June 2018.

Social Technologies claims a first commercial use date after the announcement made by Apple. Its trademark was registered in September 2018.

About a week after Social Technologies' trademark was registered, Apple filed a petition asking the TTAB to cancel that registration based on potential confusion with a trademark which had previously been used - the one for which registration was applied for in 2014. At some point Apple had gotten rights assigned to it by the party (or parties) which had used that trademark. Presumably Apple paid something for those rights.

The day after Apple filed asking to have Social Technologies' trademark registration cancelled, Social Technologies filed suit against Apple in a U.S. district court in California claiming, among other things, trademark infringement by Apple.

In October 2018 Apple applied for its own trademark registration based on the word Memoji. In January 2019 an office action was issued advising Apple that its registration would be denied based on potential confusion with Social Technologies' trademark. Apple later advised the examiner that it had challenged Social Technologies' registration (which it had done in September shortly after the trademark had been registered). Apple also asked to have its own application for registration suspended pending the outcome of its challenge to Social Technologies' registration. That challenge had itself already been suspended pending the outcome of the suit which Social Technologies brought against Apple.

So the TTAB is waiting to decide whether Social Technologies' trademark registration is valid, and then perhaps whether Apple is entitled to its own trademark registration. Apple's position - which it may prevail on - is essentially that it (through the rights it acquired from another party) was using the trademark before Social Technologies used it.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Iconoclysm Avatar
26 months ago

Surely no one can defend Apple's false advertising, breaking of federal law, and IP theft...
lol, if you make it that easy.... There is no false advertising. If a federal law is broken why is it a civil suit? If you think this is IP theft you're really off.

Now, there is something wrong that Apple did here but you missed it completely.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Top Stories

m1x mac mini screen feature

High-End 'M1X' Mac Mini With New Design and Additional Ports Expected to Launch in the 'Next Several Months'

Sunday August 22, 2021 5:59 am PDT by
Apple can be expected to launch an updated high-end Mac mini with a new design and a faster "M1X" Apple silicon processor in the "next several months," Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports. In the latest publication of his Power On newsletter, Gurman writes that a new high-end Mac mini, which has previously been reported to feature a new design with additional ports, can be expected to replace...
mac scanner permission error

Apple Says Fix Planned for 'You Do Not Have Permission to Open the Application' Error When Using a Scanner on Mac

Saturday August 14, 2021 6:15 am PDT by
In a newly published support document on its website, Apple has acknowledged an error that some users may receive when they try to use a scanner with a Mac in the Image Capture app, Preview app, or the Printers & Scanners section of System Preferences. A screenshot of the error message from the HP Support Community When attempting to use a scanner with a Mac, Apple said users might get an...
macbookpro13large

macOS Big Sur Update Bricking Some Older MacBook Pro Models

Sunday November 15, 2020 5:33 am PST by
A large number of late 2013 and mid 2014 13-inch MacBook Pro owners are reporting that the macOS Big Sur update is bricking their machines. A MacRumors forum thread contains a significant number of users reporting the issue, and similar problems are being reported across Reddit and the Apple Support Communities, suggesting the problem is widespread. Users are reporting that during the...
original iphone

Phil Schiller Says iPhone Was 'Earth-Shattering' Ten Years Ago and Remains 'Unmatched' Today

Monday January 9, 2017 7:15 am PST by
To commemorate the tenth anniversary of the iPhone, Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller sat down with tech journalist Steven Levy for a wide-ranging interview about the smartphone's past, present, and future. The report first reflects upon the iPhone's lack of support for third-party apps in its first year. The argument inside Apple was split between whether the iPhone should be a closed...
m1 imac orange

New iMac Tidbits: Headphone Jack on Side, Ethernet Port on Power Adapter, Spatial Audio and WiFi 6 Support, No SD Card Slot

Wednesday April 21, 2021 6:38 am PDT by
Apple yesterday announced a completely redesigned 24-inch iMac with the M1 Apple silicon chip. The new iMac, the first major redesign of the Mac desktop computer since 2012, has several changes compared to the previous generation. In the aftermath of the event, a few new features and tidbits may have slipped under the radar, so we’ve compiled this list of some of the less-talked-about...
omg lightning cable comparison

Security Researcher Develops Lightning Cable With Hidden Chip to Steal Passwords

Thursday September 2, 2021 6:59 am PDT by
A normal-looking Lightning cable that can used to steal data like passwords and send it to a hacker has been developed, Vice reports. The "OMG Cable" compared to Apple's Lightning to USB cable. The "OMG Cable" works exactly like a normal Lightning to USB cable and can log keystrokes from connected Mac keyboards, iPads, and iPhones, and then send this data to a bad actor who could be over a...
Top Stories 75 Thumbnail

Top Stories: Last-Minute iPhone 13 Rumors, Apple Announces App Store Changes, and More

Saturday September 4, 2021 6:00 am PDT by
The finish line is in sight! Apple's annual iPhone event is likely just a week or so away and all eyes will be on the company as it unveils the next version of its most popular product line. With any luck, we'll also see the next-generation Apple Watch and perhaps even some new AirPods. Other news this week saw Apple making some more changes to its App Store policies in response to a...
General YouTube Feature 1

YouTube Premium and Music Surpass 50 Million Subscribers

Friday September 3, 2021 2:19 am PDT by
YouTube says it has passed 50 million subscribers for its Premium and Music subscriptions, making it the "fastest growing music subscription" service in the world, according to YouTube's global head of music, Lyor Cohen. YouTube says that it has more than 50 million paying subscribers collectively across YouTube Premium and YouTube Music. The Google-owned service says it attributes this...
iPhone 13 Dummy Thumbnail 2

Full iPhone 13 Feature Breakdown: Everything Rumors Say We Can Expect

Tuesday August 31, 2021 7:50 am PDT by
With the launch of Apple's iPhone 13 lineup believed to be just a few weeks away, we have compiled all of the coherent rumors from our coverage over the past year to build a full picture of the features and upgrades coming to the company's new smartphones. For clarity, only explicit improvements, upgrades, and new features compared to the iPhone 12 lineup are listed. It is worth noting that...
apple wallet drivers license

Apple Announces First U.S. States That Will Let You Add Your Driver's License to Your iPhone

Wednesday September 1, 2021 6:15 am PDT by
Apple today announced the first U.S. states that will be rolling out the ability for residents to add their driver's license or state ID to the Wallet app on the iPhone and Apple Watch. Arizona and Georgia will be the first states to support the feature, with Connecticut, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Oklahoma, and Utah to follow, according to Apple. Apple said select TSA security checkpoints in ...