New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Watch the Apple Watch Series 4 Smoke Older Apple Watches in Speed Comparison

The Apple Watch Series 4, launched last week, features a new dual-core S4 chip that's significantly faster than the S3 chip in the Series 3, and, of course, the chips used in older Apple Watch models.

We did a side-by-side comparison of the Apple Watch Series 4 to the original Apple Watch, the Series 1 models, the Series 2 models, and the Apple Watch Series 3 to see how far the Apple Watch has come since it was first introduced in 2015.

Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos.

According to Apple, the fourth-generation dual-core 64-bit Silicon-in-Package or SIP chip in the Apple Watch is twice as fast as the previous-generation S3 chip. Its improved efficiency and speed allow for better battery conservation and new health-related features like ECG readings.

In our testing, we compared Apple Watch tasks like booting up, opening apps, and activating Siri to demonstrate the speed differences between each generation.

Unsurprisingly, the Series 4 was the fastest, but for a lot of tasks, there weren't huge speed differences between the Series 4 and the Series 3.

When comparing the Series 4 to the Series 2 and older, though, you can see the impressive improvements Apple has made to the processor over the course of the last three years. While it took the Apple Watch Series 4 40 seconds to boot up, it took the Series 2 almost four minutes, the Series 1 three minutes, and the Series 0 five minutes.

When opening up apps, we didn't see a huge difference between the Series 3 and Series 4 for most tests, but the Series 4 was always just a little bit faster. On Series 2 and older, apps took a good deal longer to open, and in some cases, like with the original Apple Watch, apps took so long we gave up.

So, what can we learn from this? You may not see major speed changes when upgrading to Series 4 from Series 3, though everything will feel snappier.

You will, however, notice an incredible difference upgrading from an original Apple Watch, Series 1 model, or Series 2 model, which makes upgrading from one of these older devices worthwhile.

In our opinion, if you're considering upgrading from a Series 2 or earlier to the Series 4, do it. The speed changes are so drastic that using the Apple Watch Series 4 is an entirely different experience than using an older Apple Watch.

Have you upgraded to a Series 4 from an older Apple Watch model? Let us know what you think about the new device in the comments below.

Related Roundups: Apple Watch, watchOS 5
Buyer's Guide: Apple Watch (Buy Now)


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

11 weeks ago
Surely it's not good for a watch to be "fast"...?:)
Rating: 47 Votes
11 weeks ago
The Watch 4 is the first watch that really makes a statement for looks and utility of a smartwatch.

The processing has finally gotten good enough to make this compelling enough to replace your iPhone some of the time.
Rating: 18 Votes
11 weeks ago
Next Apple watch feature: Smoke detection when it smokes other smart watches.
Rating: 15 Votes
11 weeks ago
Yea, just upgraded from a Series 1, and, damn...
Rating: 11 Votes
11 weeks ago

I find it funny when people act surprised that the Series 1 and Series 2 perform similarly (with the Series 1 beating the Series 2 in certain cases). They are the same chip minus the GPS on the Series 1 (and I suspect that mostly explains why the Series 1 bests the Series 2 on the bootup test as it has less things to load).

As an aside it looks like I'm going to have to go back to wanting to upgrade to a Series 4 just for the bigger screen and thinner profile as it doesn't look the speed difference compared to my Series 3 will be that noticeable in everyday use (except maybe with 3rd party apps, but I rarely use any). Oh well...


Coming from Series 3, I feel like the Series 4 is just overall speedier and a much more pleasing experience even though the differences look minimal in the video. A second here or there really adds up.
Rating: 11 Votes
11 weeks ago
This highlights the stupidity of the first real gold Apple Watch Edition that started at $10,000 and went up to $17,000. How stupid does one have to be to spend so much money on something that will be outperformed by the cheapest Apple Watch the very next year, and massively outperformed by the cheapest Apple Watch a few years after that?
Rating: 10 Votes
11 weeks ago
Call quality, the main factor in my choice to upgrade. The new speaker loudness and clarity is so far above the series 3 it sold me on that one feature. I do appreciate the other stuff too.
Rating: 8 Votes
11 weeks ago
I find it funny when people act surprised that the Series 1 and Series 2 perform similarly (with the Series 1 beating the Series 2 in certain cases). They are the same chip minus the GPS on the Series 1 (and I suspect that mostly explains why the Series 1 bests the Series 2 on the bootup test as it has less things to load).

As an aside it looks like I'm going to have to go back to wanting to upgrade to a Series 4 just for the bigger screen and thinner profile as it doesn't look the speed difference compared to my Series 3 will be that noticeable in everyday use (except maybe with 3rd party apps, but I rarely use any). Oh well...
Rating: 7 Votes
11 weeks ago
It’s noticeable even from my series 3
Rating: 5 Votes
11 weeks ago

Take better care of your stuff? My Apple Watch Series 0 opened up the camera app in less than 5 seconds. Amongst other things, it isn't as slow as you make it out to be. I WILL AGREE THAT POWERING IT ON TOOK 5 MIN THO


Take better care of your stuff? What does that even mean for a processor? Don’t use it?

My S0 took just as long to open the camera. Not sure how I can take care of a wrist computer better other than not breaking it lmao
Rating: 5 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]