Security Researcher Shows How Remote macOS Exploit Hoodwinks Safari Users With Custom URL Schemes - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Security Researcher Shows How Remote macOS Exploit Hoodwinks Safari Users With Custom URL Schemes

by

A security researcher has demonstrated how macOS users are vulnerable to remote infection through a malicious exploit involving the "Do you want to allow..." popup that can be encountered when visiting websites in Safari.

In a lengthy breakdown, Patrick Wardle explains how the exploit utilizes document handlers, which request permission to open a link or a file in another app – like a PDF in Preview, for example – and URL handlers, which work similarly in the way they notify macOS that they can accept certain file formats.

malicious attack safari
The exploit occurs when a user visits a malicious website and a ZIP file is downloaded and automatically unzipped by Safari, whereby the custom URL scheme is initially registered on the user's filesystem.

Once the target visits our malicious website, we trigger the download of an archive (.zip) file that contains our malicious application. If the Mac user is using Safari, the archive will be automatically unzipped, as Apple thinks it's wise to automatically open "safe" files. This fact is paramount, as it means the malicious application (vs. just a compressed zip archive) will now be on the user's filesystem, which will trigger the registration of any custom URL scheme handlers! Thanks Apple!

In the next stage, the malicious web page runs code that can load or "browse" to the custom URL scheme, which causes macOS to activate the URL handler and launch the malicious application.

This action is enabled through the Safari user prompt that includes options to "Allow" or "Cancel" the process, however the popup text and available options are controlled by the attacker, and are therefore easily changed to trick or deceive the user.

malicious exploit safari
The standard defenses built into macOS – Gatekeeper, for example – are said to be ineffective when it comes to the attack described above, and while Apple could always revoke the malicious app's signature, that course of action would obviously be too late for anyone who had already gone ahead and launched it.

Until then, turning off automatic unzipping of "safe" files should be enough to prevent the malicious procedure from ever occurring. Concerned users can do so by clicking the Safari menu bar, selecting Preferences..., and under the General tab, unchecking Open "safe" files after downloading.

Top Rated Comments

Kebabselector Avatar
103 months ago
Until then, turning off automatic unzipping of "safe" files should be enough to prevent the malicious procedure from ever occurring. Concerned users can do so by clicking the Safari menu bar, selecting Preferences..., and under the General tab, unchecking Open "safe" files after downloading.
Surely this should be the default position for any user regardless of the exploit or not.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
103 months ago
There have been a few previous security vulnerabilities relating to Safari on the Mac, where allowing Safari to open 'safe' files was the entry vector.

Ever since the first such vulnerability, it's been my opinion that the safest approach is to simply leave that option turned off permanently. Particularly as it doesn't really add much convenience. I very rarely want to open a file as soon as it's been downloaded. Also, opening a file manually involves two clicks at the very most.

Anyway, I feel this is one instance where security outweighs convenience by a very wide margin.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Porco Avatar
103 months ago
I have always turned this option off for any mac I worked with. It should never have been a thing, and certainly never the default.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
twistedpixel8 Avatar
103 months ago
Surely this should be the default position for any user regardless of the exploit or not.
It shouldn’t even be a feature. How lazy do you have to be if you can’t double click an archive?!
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Justanotherfanboy Avatar
103 months ago
His snarky “thanks Apple!” comment seemed a bit unprofessional for a security researcher.
Surely he must be aware that all tech companies don’t try to have security holes... & if none existed whatsoever, he’d be out of a job.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
MrGimper Avatar
103 months ago
I only came here to doff my cap for the use of the word "hoodwinks"
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

bug security vulnerability issue fix larry

CrashStealer Malware Impersonates Apple Tool to Steal Mac Passwords and Crypto

Wednesday July 15, 2026 4:14 pm PDT by
Mac users should watch out for macOS malware called CrashStealer, according to Jamf Threat Labs. The malware impersonates Apple's crash reporting framework, and it's meant to steal all kinds of sensitive information. CrashStealer collects browser data, password manager data, cryptocurrency wallet extensions, and keychain data, and Jamf first noticed it circulating in a fake Apple-notarized...
Apple 2026 Back to School Graphic

Apple's 2026 Back to School Offer Just Went Live in Select Countries

Wednesday July 15, 2026 11:48 am PDT by
Apple's annual Back to School promotion is now live in select countries in Asia, including China, India, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The offer provides college students and educational staff with a free item with the purchase of an eligible Mac or iPad model. The exact offer varies by country, with options including a pack of four AirTags, AirPods 4,...
iphone 17 cyber

Apple Closes Unlocked iPhone Loophole for T-Mobile and Verizon Financing

Wednesday July 15, 2026 3:20 pm PDT by
Carrier-financed iPhones purchased from Apple will soon be locked to the carrier, ending a workaround customers used to purchase an unlocked iPhone on a payment plan. Until the rule change, buying an iPhone from Apple and opting for financing through Verizon or T-Mobile meant you would get an iPhone not locked to either carrier's network. That's no longer the case, and now iPhones financed...