Samsung Ordered to Pay Apple $539 Million in iPhone Design Patent Retrial - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Samsung Ordered to Pay Apple $539 Million in iPhone Design Patent Retrial

The latest Samsung v. Apple trial wrapped up this afternoon after the jury decided that Samsung must pay Apple a total of $539 million for violating Apple's design patents with five android devices sold between 2010 and 2011, reports CNET.

A total of $533,316,606 was awarded to Apple for Samsung's violation of three design patents, while the remaining $5,325,050 was for Samsung's infringement on two of Apple's utility patents.

applevsamsung
Samsung and Apple were back in court to redetermined damages after Samsung appealed to the Supreme Court and said that the original damages award, which was set at $399 million after several appeals, was a "disproportionate" sum for the design violation.

The Supreme Court ordered the U.S. Court of Appeals to redetermine the damages amount, leading to today's victory for Apple.

The core issue of the retrial was whether the damages should be based on the total value of the iPhone or if Samsung's fee should be based on just the elements of the iPhone that it copied.

apple v samsung 2011
Apple argued that its payment should be based on the full value of the iPhone, while Samsung argued that it should pay a lesser amount. They're seeking profits on the entire phone," argued Samsung lawyer John Quinn. "Apple's design patents do not cover the entire phone. They are entitled to profits only on [infringing] components, not the entire phone."

Apple asked the jury to award $1 billion in damages, while Samsung asked jurors to limit the damages to $28 million. Unfortunately for Samsung, the jury sided with Apple, and the new award is more than Samsung would have had to pay had the retrial not happened.

In a statement, Apple had this to say: "It is a fact that Samsung blatantly copied our design. We're grateful to the jury for their service and pleased they agree that Samsung should pay for copying our products.

Update: Samsung also gave a statement on the verdict: "Today's decision flies in the face of a unanimous Supreme Court ruling in favor of Samsung on the scope of design patent damages. We will consider all options to obtain an outcome that does not hinder creativity."

Popular Stories

iphone duo cover glass

Apple to Pay $250 Per iPhone Duo Foldable Display in Samsung Deal

Friday September 11, 2026 3:10 am PDT by
Samsung Display has signed a three-year exclusive supply agreement with Apple to provide foldable display panels for the iPhone Duo and future models, reports Chinese leaker Instant Digital. The iPhone Duo is the first device on the market to feature Samsung's M16 OLED material set, said to bring improvements to brightness, color performance, lifespan, and power efficiency over previous OLED...
iphone duo hero

Samsung Mocks iPhone Duo

Wednesday September 9, 2026 1:28 pm PDT by
Samsung took to social media today to mock the iPhone Duo while Apple announced the device. In a series of sarcastic posts that did not explicitly mention Apple or the iPhone Duo, Samsung made comments like "Let us know when you're done reheating our leftovers" and "Was it exciting? No. Did it happen? Yes." Samsung used an #ItsTimeToSwitch hashtag in some of its posts. Launching on...
iphone duo hero

iPhone Duo is Dust-Tight With IP68 Rating, Unlike Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold8

Wednesday September 9, 2026 5:46 pm PDT by
The iPhone Duo has an IP68 dust and water resistance rating, beating Samsung and tying Google. Samsung's latest Galaxy Z Fold8 models have an IP48 dust and water resistance rating, which means they aren't able to hold up to dust as well. Google's Pixel 11 Pro Fold also has an IP68 rating. IP6X for dust means the iPhone Duo is "dust-tight" and no dust is able to get in. The IPX8 rating for ...

Top Rated Comments

109 months ago
I remember back in the day picking up a colleagues Samsung Galaxy (I think that’s the model it was) and thinking it was an iPhone 3G, even being amazed how similar the icon layout was. To say they didn’t copy any of it is a bit of a lie.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bladerunner2000 Avatar
109 months ago
Samsung likes to copy Apple... however, they are still smart enough not to copy Siri... :D
Remember that time when Apple didn't just steal an idea, but claimed it as their own? I do:



1 year earlier showing tech from the 80s:

Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
seatton Avatar
109 months ago
Samsung likes to copy Apple... however, they are still smart enough not to copy Siri... :D
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
longofest Avatar
109 months ago
As long as this back and forth has been going on though, I feel like that is just paying legal fees.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bladerunner2000 Avatar
109 months ago
Pay it and end this circus. Can't believe Apple got away with owning rounded corners.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
wbeasley Avatar
109 months ago
“We will consider all options to obtain an outcome that does not hinder creativity."

How about not copying? Blatantly.

Yes all phones now look and act much the same. But back when this started Samsung went from one design to an almost exact copy. They do it in other industries too. That’s how they operate. Apple kept at them when most companies give up.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)