Police Ask 3D Print Lab to Replicate Dead Man's Finger to Unlock Phone

iphone_5s_touch_idPolice in Michigan are reportedly attempting to use a 3D model of a fingerprint to unlock a murder victim's phone and reveal clues that could help solve an open case.

Fusion reports that the investigation is still ongoing, therefore details remain murky, but essentially instead of requesting that the phone manufacturer unlocks the murder victim's handset, officers have asked computer scientists at Michigan State University to create a 3D printed replica of the victim's fingers so they can do it themselves.

The victim's body was apparently too decayed for a fingerprint to be directly applied to the phone, but the police already had a scan of the victim's prints from when the man was arrested in a previous case.

Most fingerprint readers like Apple's Touch ID are capacitive, meaning they use electric circuits that close when human skin comes into contact with them, which generates the image of the print.

However, a 3D printed finger doesn't possess the conductivity that human skin does. So, to circumvent the problem, engineers coated the printed fingers in a thin layer of metallic particles so that the fingerprint scanner can read them.

Currently it's unclear whether the method works, as the designers haven't yet delivered the printed fingers to the police to attempt to unlock the victim's phone.

Another potential stumbling block is that if the phone in question is an iPhone, then police may come up against a passcode screen, since newer Apple handsets request a passcode if the fingerprint unlock hasn't been used within eight hours and the code hasn't been entered in six days.

But if the technology is a success, then theoretically the authorities could use it on cases involving living suspects by applying for a court order.

Fusion notes that the courts draw a distinction between a fingerprint password and a memorized one. "Courts generally draw a line between the 'contents of the mind' (which is protected) and 'tangible' bodily evidence like blood, DNA, and fingerprints (which is not)," said Bryan Choi, a security, law and technology researcher.

So while a memorized password might be protected by the Fifth Amendment which protects against self-incrimination, a fingerprint isn't. Indeed, in 2014, a court in Virginia ruled that a suspect can be required to unlock their phone using their fingerprint.

Therefore if a suspect is at large but the police have their phone in hand and their fingerprints on record, there's nothing to say that the method could be used to unlock the device in the owner's absence.

Choi argues that in this day and age, phones should be considered extensions of the mind and therefore protected under the Fifth Amendment and not just the Fourth Amendment (protection against illegal search and seizure).

"We offload so many of our personal thoughts, moments, tics, and habits to our cellphones," Choi told Fusion. "Having those contents aired in court feels like having your innermost thoughts extracted and spilled unwillingly in public."


Top Rated Comments

(View all)
Avatar
8 months ago
Plot twist: iPhone would require passcode unlock and Apple won't provide it (since it wasn't owner of a torrent site)
Rating: 18 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
That's why Apple requires your passcode if your phone hasn't been accessed by Touch ID for 8 hours.
Rating: 10 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago

Plot twist: iPhone would require passcode unlock and Apple won't provide it (since it wasn't owner of a torrent site)

Apple wouldn't have hacked into a phone in the other case either. If you don't see the difference you need to redhead both articles, but more likely you are deliberately ignoring the difference.

In this case I'm sure Apple will provide access to iCloud if presented with a valid court order. They don't have to passcode so they can't do it.
Rating: 7 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
This is downright scary, at what point do fingerprints cease to be an incriminating factor because of this? If you've been arrested before, the police can literally leave your fingerprints at the scene...
Rating: 6 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
Coming up: "You have the right to remain silent. Your finger will be chopped off and put on Formaldehyde for possible future use if deemed necessary in a court of law. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you."
Rating: 5 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
How does one alert loved ones of one's passwords in the event of one's death?

I feel that someone needs to invent an app or some neat way for solving this problem. Leaving a paper note isn't very secure.

How about this? One could instruct Apple to lift a password restriction on an iCloud account on presentation of a death certificate. That way, passwords stored in iCloud could then be accessible.
Rating: 5 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
Ewww

I suppose that was only a matter of time, but if the thumb was too decayed to unlock it, wouldn't the poor thumbprint be on the printed digit as well?

Also doesnt the iPhone require the passcode after a certain amount of time, between usage?
Rating: 4 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
Pretty sure those issues are covered in the article!
Rating: 3 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
Key word is phone. i.e. it's not an iPhone. passcode pretty much blocks this form of intrusion on iPhones. Sure it may solve a murder but if you can 3d print something the security measure isn't any good without extra checks and fallbacks.
Rating: 2 Votes
Avatar
8 months ago
Uh...when introducing the TouchID didn't Apple specifically describe how the touch ID goes down several layers of the skin?

I don't see how this is going to work.
Rating: 2 Votes
[ Read All Comments ]