GT Advanced Saw Production Troubles as Early as February

GT Advanced Technologies, Apple's sapphire partner, may have been seeing production problems and missing technical milestones as early as February, according to a new report from The Wall Street Journal that examines GT's securities filings.

It's widely known that Apple did not provide GT Advanced with a fourth and final $139 million loan payment aimed at giving the sapphire supplier a means to purchase vital equipment, but Apple also delivered its third payment to the company two months after it was expected.

GT was set to receive a $103 million payment in February of 2014, but did not receive the payment until April 2014, two months later, as it had failed to meet Apple's requirements on time.
The third payment, of $103 million, was due in February, but Apple did not make it until April, according to GT's securities filings. The final installment of $139 million was due in April, according to a GT securities filing. In August, GT said it expected the payment by October. But Apple never made the payment, because GT did not meet certain requirements, according to people familiar with the matter.
Shortly after GT Advanced missed its February payment, the company's CEO, Thomas Gutierrez and its Chief Operating Officer, Daniel Squiller, set plans in motion to begin selling off stock. While the timing of their subsequent sales was subject to the schedules laid out in their trading plans, it is clear those plans were established after GT began having difficulties meeting its milestones.

Gutierrez set up a pre-arranged Rule 10b5-1 sale in March, which saw him selling more than 9,000 shares of GT Advanced stock on September 8, a day ahead of Apple's iPhone announcement. Gutierrez also sold off stock throughout the year, netting more than $10 million before stock prices faltered after it became clear Apple was not using sapphire in the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus.

Squiller sold $1.2 million worth of stock in May and made plans to sell off additional shares throughout 2014, garnering another $750,000 before the company filed for bankruptcy. Squiller continues to hold more than 200,000 shares of GT stock, which have lost much of their value.

Apple did end up making a total of three loan payments to GT Advanced totaling $440 million after signing an agreement in October of 2013, and the company also reportedly tried to help the supplier meet the requirements to receive the fourth payment ahead of GT's surprise Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.

GT Advanced's deal with Apple was highly favorable to the Cupertino-based company, with the sapphire supplier taking on all of the risk. Apple supplied the facility and the loan for the company to purchase equipment, but GT was required to meet technical milestones to receive the money and it also signed contracts that prevented it from selling its sapphire to other companies. Apple, meanwhile, was under no obligation to purchase GT's sapphire.

Details about the deal's deterioration have been coming out bit by bit, making it difficult to piece together exactly what went wrong. It appears that GT's failed to produce sapphire up to Apple's standards, leading the company to stick with Gorilla Glass instead of sapphire screens for its iPhones. GT Advanced has been able to supply little information on its bankruptcy filing, as it is bound by non-disclosure agreements that could see it paying $50 million in fines for each violation.

Apple and GT Advanced have asked to keep court documents sealed, but The Wall Street Journal today filed a motion asking the court make the documents public.

Following its Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, GT Advanced last week asked for permission to begin winding down operations at its Mesa, Arizona sapphire plant, suggesting the company plans to cease its sapphire production all together. Apple has said that it plans to focus on "preserving jobs" in Arizona, and is working with local and state officials as it considers its next steps.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

69 months ago
Now we know what GT standard for, Grand Theft.
Rating: 51 Votes
69 months ago
I'll let you guess who was spreading rumours that the next iPhone was going to use a sapphire screen. And they had a planned sale of stocks just before the iPhone announcement.... what a coincidence :eek:
Rating: 33 Votes
69 months ago
Management gets millions... workers get unemployed. Because it's the management that take risks. :rolleyes:
Rating: 33 Votes
69 months ago
That CEO sure sounds legit...
Rating: 33 Votes
69 months ago

GT Advanced's deal with Apple was highly favorable to the Cupertino-based company, with the sapphire supplier taking on all of the risk.

Seems like Apple took on plenty of risk. We'll see how much of that $440 million they get back.
Rating: 29 Votes
69 months ago
Oh boy... this screams insider trading
Rating: 28 Votes
69 months ago

No sane business management team would ever agree to a deal with Apple given those terms, right? Hell, I have no business education and even I would never agree to that deal.

Maybe you would if you were unscrupulous and planned on selling $10M worth of your own stock once the deal went south (say after your failed to deliver on promises that you said you could deliver on, but knew were not possible).

I think that for their $440M, Apple should get the equipment in Arizona (they already own the facility which they are leasing to GTAT) and they should get the GTAT patents. As far as I can see, the GTAT execs already took their payday. Let's save the jobs in Arizona if possible -- Apple is the only one who can do that.
Rating: 20 Votes
69 months ago
Bring manufacturing back to the states they said, we do it better they said... What does this mean for that initiative?

I am all for it and was super excited to see AZ get this deal, but wow does it suck now.
Rating: 20 Votes
69 months ago

Apple took NO RISK! How could someone say that? How stupid!

Apple will at least get all the equipment back.

For those Apple fanbois, I find it hard to believe that anyone believes Apple didn't know what was going on in Arizona after investing this much money.

If so, then Tim Cook is certainly NO STEVE JOBS!

Yawn. Used equipment is NOT the same as "taking no risk" and you can give up on the "Tim Cook isn't Steve Jobs" nonsense. The man is dead. Deal with it.
Rating: 17 Votes
69 months ago

Hey MacRumors,

Have you considered making a GT Advanced drama forum?

Some moderator has a gun to your head and forced you to read the story?
Rating: 15 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]