New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

AMD's New 400-Series 'Polaris' Graphics Chips Headed for 2016 Macs

Following up on its rumor of a major AMD design win reported last October, WCCFtech has confirmed via multiple sources that the customer in question is indeed Apple. The latest design win follows Apple's use of AMD 200/300 series GPUs in the top-end 27-inch Retina iMac and 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro, and is a boon for the chipmaker that has seen its share of the graphics market dwindle over the past several years.

The design wins make mention of two graphics processor families, Polaris 10 and Polaris 11. The former carries a code name "Ellesmere" and is believed to be in the power range that would make it suitable for an upgrade to the iMac. Polaris 11 has the code name "Baffin" and it is believed to be in the power range suitable for an upgrade to the Retina MacBook Pro.

AMD-Polaris-11-Polaris-10-GPUs-feature
While Apple has limited discrete graphics chips to the top of its MacBook Pro and iMac lines, there would be suitable chips for all but the smallest form factors of Apple notebooks, should the company choose to embrace discrete graphics on a broader array of models.

As we previously noted, the switch to the new Polaris line of GPUs is set to be a significant performance upgrade over the previous 28nm GPUs. Announced by AMD at Computex, the lower-power AMD GPUs are set to be built on Global Foundries' 14nm process. Through an agreement between multiple foundries, the process is equivalent to Samsung's own second-generation 14nm FinFET process, which is the successor of the process used for the A9 and A9X featured in the latest iPhones and iPads.

AMD-Polaris-16
Performance of these new graphics chips from AMD is expected to be double that of their predecessors, measured on a per-watt basis. This is thanks to the large size reduction and performance gains in going from the 28nm node first seen in 2011 for graphics processors to the new 16/14nm FinFET processes. This would certainly be welcome to the Mac lineup due to the increased graphics demands of the high-resolution Retina screens featured in both the iMac and MacBook Pro computers. It is reasonable to expect that Apple would allocate roughly the same power budget as on current models, meaning the 2x performance could be seen by users in some cases.

According to earlier reports, the chips should be ready to ship in consumer products in time for the back-to-school shopping season. It is not unheard of for Apple to receive priority on new chip designs, though WWDC would be the most logical time to expect these new Macs to debut. The future of the Mac Pro is less certain, though there will certainly be suitable high-end chips from AMD manufactured on TSMC's 16nm process this year.

Related Roundups: iMac, MacBook Pro
Tags: AMD, wccftech.com
Buyer's Guide: iMac (Don't Buy), MacBook Pro (Buy Now)


Top Rated Comments

(View all)

10 months ago
If Apple announces a proper new mac mini I will get all caught up in my feels.:oops: It's the only thing I want from Apple. Am I asking for too much?:confused: I will pretend that last updated mini never happened, and all will be forgiven.
Rating: 29 Votes
10 months ago
Give me a Mac Mini option with one of these in it and I may stay with Apple. My patience has grow thin.
Rating: 21 Votes
10 months ago

Give me a Mac Mini option with one of these in it and I may stay with Apple.


I would really love to see an updated Mac Mini. You know, a real update, not dumbing it down by removing previously available options and calling it an "update".
Rating: 19 Votes
10 months ago
Please bring Nvidia for dedicated cards. That would be a much better switch.
Rating: 19 Votes
10 months ago
I know how Apple sees Intel (stalled) and Nvidia (useless pieces of garbage) and dGPUs in general (power hungry, outdated processes, points of failure, useless on any lightweight/well built mobile PC). But frankly, they are paid to find alternatives.

I can't get excited for any of this until Apple resolves the big picture: OS X and its graphical performance that is milleniuns behind Windows. Looking at how FCP takes advantage of OS X and Apple hardware (enough to annihilate competition) one can only imagine what they would be able to do if the support was up-to-date.
Rating: 18 Votes
10 months ago

Anyone doing professional audio or video should not touch Apple hardware (without being paid to), because you cannot depend on Apple to stick to anything other than satisfying the teen crowd. Mac Pro 3 years old no upgrade/update. No hardware between Mini and Mac Pro. No top end laptops. I could go on. When these people move away from Apple, it no longer makes sense to stay in the Apple ecosystem, except of course for the phone, which is now a commodity with limited growth. I am one of the few professionals that I know in my profession that still uses Apple hardware, the others have moved to windows.

Funny. I work at ESPN, ALL macs in video production. But hey, they're not pros apparently.

And you know what's funny? I've never heard one video editor ever mention anything about the macs. Hell, for all they know their screens are plugged into toasters. You know why they don't care? They're busy getting content on air for over 30 channels, and millions of viewers each and every day. You know, working.

Don't confuse your tech snobbery with professionalism.
Rating: 17 Votes
10 months ago
This is encouraging.
Rating: 15 Votes
10 months ago

Anyone doing professional audio or video should not touch Apple hardware (without being paid to), because you cannot depend on Apple to stick to anything other than satisfying the teen crowd. Mac Pro 3 years old no upgrade/update. No hardware between Mini and Mac Pro. No top end laptops. I could go on. When these people move away from Apple, it no longer makes sense to stay in the Apple ecosystem, except of course for the phone, which is now a commodity with limited growth. I am one of the few professionals that I know in my profession that still uses Apple hardware, the others have moved to windows.


The margins aren't high enough in the market pros and semi-pros are in.
They are the ones who buy based on cold hard facts. They see HP make a desktop that makes their workflow faster for the same money, they shop HP.

Apple doesn't want anything to do with them, because they simply aren't thrilled by Apple's ever growing need of maximizing margins.

If I were you I'd quickly find an exit strategy shouldn't you already have one.
The writing is on the wall:

Mac Pro - 2 years no update. (before that they didn't even bother to adapt the old Mac Pro to EU standards and actually halted sales for the time being until the new Mac Pro launched many months later - that's unacceptable in the professional market)

Aperture - Use Apple Photos! Yeah right...

Garage Band getting Logic Pro features and loops - Hey, I remember that... Shared libraries between Aperture and iPhoto anyone?

Well, the list goes on... Long story short: I'm amazed by your loyalty, I truly am.
Apple got through its toughest times only because of professionals who back then at least still could get top-notch gear buying from Apple.
I'm sure a mass exodus would have spurred innovation on the PC side to mature at a faster rate, too, but yes indeed, the fashion crowd is where it's at today.
The casual home user who benchmarks their new machine by how amazing the holiday pictures on Facebook look.
Now I'm not one to sneeze at less demanding users, but what I find irritating is how they get absolutely screwed these days price-wise.
Apple's long left the territory of reasonable surcharge for superior experience, especially when you have to deal with the hardware outside of Apple's warranty.

Another day, another rant about Apple's downfall from me (QUALITY-wise, not MARKETSHARE or financial performance-wise, many people seem to only see Apple's financial health as a parameter for Apple's well-being, trusty sheeple they are!)

Glassed Silver:mac
Rating: 9 Votes
10 months ago

I know how Apple sees Intel (stalled) and Nvidia (useless pieces of garbage) and dGPUs in general (power hungry, outdated processes, points of failure, useless on any lightweight/well built mobile PC). But frankly, they are paid to find alternatives.

I can't get excited for any of this until Apple resolves the big picture: OS X and its graphical performance that is milleniuns behind Windows. Looking at how FCP takes advantage of OS X and Apple hardware (enough to annihilate competition) one can only imagine what they would be able to do if the support was up-to-date.

I agree with you about OS X when is comes to graphical performance and sound cards. Running windows on my mac makes those differences clear.
Rating: 9 Votes
10 months ago

Wow what a completely insane response.


Anyone doing professional audio or video should not touch Apple hardware (without being paid to), because you cannot depend on Apple to stick to anything other than satisfying the teen crowd. Mac Pro 3 years old no upgrade/update. No hardware between Mini and Mac Pro. No top end laptops. I could go on. When these people move away from Apple, it no longer makes sense to stay in the Apple ecosystem, except of course for the phone, which is now a commodity with limited growth. I am one of the few professionals that I know in my profession that still uses Apple hardware, the others have moved to windows.
Rating: 9 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]