Apple Calls Samsung's Request to See iPhone 5 and iPad 3 an 'Attempt to Harass'
FOSS Patents now reports that Apple has filed a response to Samsung's request, referring to the move as an "improper attempt to harass" Apple by requesting to see secret hardware that bears no relevance to Apple's claims against Samsung. From Apple's filing:
Samsung's Motion to Compel is an improper attempt to harass Apple by demanding production of extremely sensitive trade secrets that have no relevance to Apple's likelihood of success on its infringement claims or to a preliminary injunction motion. Apple made a compelling showing in its motion to expedite discovery that Apple needs samples of products that Samsung has already announced, distributed, and described, so that Apple can evaluate whether to file a preliminary injunction motion against those products, which look strikingly similar to the distinctive trade dress of Apple's current products. Samsung has made no such showing about Apple's future products. Therefore, Samsung's Motion to Compel should be denied.
Samsung has until this Friday to produce the samples of unreleased hardware to Apple, after which time Apple will decide whether to proceed with a request for a preliminary injunction barring Samsung from selling the new products, a move that could give Apple significant leverage in extracting a settlement from Samsung. This Friday should also see a ruling on whether Samsung will be permitted access to Apple's next-generation hardware.Top Rated Comments
(View all)Samsung needs to see Apple's products because...???
It's completely irrelevant?
Unless they really do base their product designs on what comes out of Apple? There are easier ways to admit guilt.
Because, you know, fairsees.
Is Samsungs products really THAT similar to Apples... :confused:
MacRumors - Conflicted
Blogs/Serious Blogs - Yes: Samsungs Bad
Engadget comment section - **** Apple.
Go figure.
So when Apple demands to see prototypes, it's ok. But when Samsung requests exactly the same thing, it's called harassment? Interesting...
Do you people even read the news article?
Samsung had already shown their products in public no less. I don't think the two are equivalent.
shocking
i was expecting apple to invite a few samsung engineers to their labs to discuss everything in detail and send them back with demo units
Samsung's legal argument is that reciprocal device analysis ;Samsung wants the same).
no, Apple wants to see products that are already announced, Samsung wants to see products that have not only not been announced but do not exist yet. there is a big difference there... worse it is Apple suing for trade dress, Samsung has not brought such a suit, so has no basis in asking to see what does not exist.
i was expecting apple to invite a few samsung engineers to their labs to discuss everything in detail and send them back with demo units
Engineers are not involved on either side. Just lawyers.
[ Read All Comments ]

Intuit has upgraded the iOS app for its Mint personal finance tool with two new "most-requested" features that should keep users from ever having to go to the Mint.com website. Until now,...
As noted by ifoAppleStore, Apple is continuing its trickle of retail store openings this week with a new location opening on Friday, May 25 in Paris. The new Les Quatre Temps store will be...
TiVo owners can control their devices via an iOS app on the iPhone and iPad, but -- for the moment -- can only watch shows on their television.
But that's all going to change in a few months....