Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company.

Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature
The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple's bid to have the case dismissed failed, the litigation moved into discovery.

Samsung is central to the case. All four complaints identify Samsung as Apple's "closest smartphone competitor," and plaintiffs allege that Apple's conduct caused Samsung to stop making smartwatches that connect to iPhone in 2021. Apple subpoenaed Samsung's U.S. subsidiary, Samsung Electronics America, for documents, but the subsidiary declined to produce any records, arguing the materials are held solely by its South Korean parent. Apple says Samsung America lodged that objection 65 times across its responses.

In a memorandum filed on April 7, Apple asked the court to issue a formal letter of request under the Hague Evidence Convention, an international mechanism that allows civil proceedings to seek documents from foreign entities. The request targets market research, sales data, financial statements, and consumer switching analyses from Samsung's smartphone and wearables divisions, as well as Galaxy Store developer agreements and documents relating to Samsung Pay, messaging apps, and super apps.

Apple pointed specifically to Smart Switch, Samsung's tool for transferring content from iPhone to a Samsung device, as evidence that the company holds directly relevant data on consumer switching behavior. The filing also seeks Samsung's own documents on its digital wallet fees, after plaintiffs alleged Apple charges banks 0.15% per Apple Pay transaction while Samsung charges nothing comparable.

Even if the court grants the motion, South Korean authorities would independently decide whether to comply, and Samsung Electronics could raise objections under Korean law.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

Foldable iPhone 2023 Feature Iridescent 1

Apple Approves Production of OLED Panels for Foldable iPhone

Monday June 22, 2026 8:00 am PDT by
Samsung Display has received Apple's approval to begin module production of OLED panels for Apple's first foldable iPhone, according to a report today from TheElec. Citing industry sources, the report says Samsung Display has started operating part of its back-end production lines in Vietnam to fulfill an initial order of around three million panels scheduled for delivery this year. Module...
samsung galaxy unpacked july 2026

Samsung Galaxy Unpacked Event Set for July 22 With Foldable iPhone Rival Expected to Debut

Wednesday July 8, 2026 4:11 am PDT by
Samsung has announced it will introduce its latest Galaxy smartphones at a July 22 event, including what is believed to be a Galaxy Z Fold 8 with new passport-style dimensions similar to Apple's upcoming book-style foldable iPhone. It's no secret that Samsung has been working on a new foldable form factor to go head-to-head with Apple's rumored iPhone Ultra, and the company has been hinting...
Vision Pro M5 Announcement

Report: Cheaper Apple Vision Pro Display Work Winds Down at Samsung

Wednesday July 8, 2026 5:16 am PDT by
Apple has suspended development of the display for a cheaper, lighter version of the Vision Pro that it originally planned to launch in the next few years, according to The Elec. The Korean outlet says Apple supplier Samsung Display is set to internally wind down the panel project – known in the industry as "G-VR" – with development set to be formally terminated by September. G-VR is ...

Top Rated Comments

jlc1978 Avatar
13 weeks ago

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
And Samsung depends on Apple as well. Smart companies don't take this personally, it's just part of doing business. In this case, it isn't Samsung suing Apple, but government agencies suing.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Steve Adams Avatar
13 weeks ago

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Samsung won't do anything however. They both rely on each other and this BS has been going on since the beginning of phones. Never changes, apple sues, mainly loses, and life goes on. I highly doubt Tim Apple will get the documents he's looking for from South Korea however. That's going to be slim to none chance.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
chars1ub0w Avatar
13 weeks ago
"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
13 weeks ago

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Apple and Samsung have had legal issues with each other for years. They still conduct a lot of business with each other. This suit by the U.S. DOJ hasn't changed that and won't change their relationship. They both benefit from each other.

Also, Apple is allowed to defend itself in court. The DOJ (and presumably Samsung) has access to internal Apple data through subpoena. What's happening is Apple's attorneys are asking for data from Samsung as part of their defense. Samsung is hiding behind technicalities of international law. They are welcome to do that, but Apple's lawyers should have the access to data to build their case in their defense.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
13 weeks ago
Good luck with that one Apple... might also want to remember as stated above, Samsung IS a rather important key supplier of yours...
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Happy_John Avatar
13 weeks ago

A little clarification -- this is Apple defending itself against a lawsuit.
Yes, despite how it could be framed, this ISN'T Apple vs Samsung. It's DOJ vs Big Corporation.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)