Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company.

Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature
The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple's bid to have the case dismissed failed, the litigation moved into discovery.

Samsung is central to the case. All four complaints identify Samsung as Apple's "closest smartphone competitor," and plaintiffs allege that Apple's conduct caused Samsung to stop making smartwatches that connect to iPhone in 2021. Apple subpoenaed Samsung's U.S. subsidiary, Samsung Electronics America, for documents, but the subsidiary declined to produce any records, arguing the materials are held solely by its South Korean parent. Apple says Samsung America lodged that objection 65 times across its responses.

In a memorandum filed on April 7, Apple asked the court to issue a formal letter of request under the Hague Evidence Convention, an international mechanism that allows civil proceedings to seek documents from foreign entities. The request targets market research, sales data, financial statements, and consumer switching analyses from Samsung's smartphone and wearables divisions, as well as Galaxy Store developer agreements and documents relating to Samsung Pay, messaging apps, and super apps.

Apple pointed specifically to Smart Switch, Samsung's tool for transferring content from iPhone to a Samsung device, as evidence that the company holds directly relevant data on consumer switching behavior. The filing also seeks Samsung's own documents on its digital wallet fees, after plaintiffs alleged Apple charges banks 0.15% per Apple Pay transaction while Samsung charges nothing comparable.

Even if the court grants the motion, South Korean authorities would independently decide whether to comply, and Samsung Electronics could raise objections under Korean law.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

tsmc semiconductor chip inspection 678x452

Apple Eyes Intel and Samsung as Backup US Chipmakers

Tuesday May 5, 2026 2:32 am PDT by
Apple has held "exploratory" talks with Intel and Samsung about manufacturing the main processors for its devices in the United States, reports Bloomberg ($). Apple is said to have had early-stage talks with Intel about using its chipmaking services, while Apple executives have reportedly visited a Samsung plant under construction in Texas that will also make advanced chips. The talks are ...
iPhone 18 Pro with a smaller centered Dynamic Island

iPhone 18 Pro's LTPO+ Display Upgrade to Come From Samsung, LG

Wednesday May 6, 2026 5:38 am PDT by
Apple is expected to finalize OLED panel approvals for the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max this month, with Samsung Display and LG Display likely to dominate panel supply, reports The Elec. This year, China's BOE has reportedly been closed out of the premium tier supply chain, despite having landed some panel orders for the iPhone 17 Pro models. The setback is said to be down to quality and...
samsung logo 2022

Samsung Hits $1 Trillion Valuation Amid Apple Chip Diversification Talks

Wednesday May 6, 2026 1:03 pm PDT by
Samsung today reached a valuation of $1 trillion for the first time, reports Bloomberg. Samsung's value has been climbing sharply due to increasing demand for the memory chips it manufactures, and stock increased 14.4 percent today. Samsung is the second Asian firm after Apple supplier TSMC to reach a $1 trillion valuation. Last week, Samsung's semiconductor manufacturing business wildly...

Top Rated Comments

jlc1978 Avatar
7 weeks ago

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
And Samsung depends on Apple as well. Smart companies don't take this personally, it's just part of doing business. In this case, it isn't Samsung suing Apple, but government agencies suing.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Steve Adams Avatar
7 weeks ago

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Samsung won't do anything however. They both rely on each other and this BS has been going on since the beginning of phones. Never changes, apple sues, mainly loses, and life goes on. I highly doubt Tim Apple will get the documents he's looking for from South Korea however. That's going to be slim to none chance.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
chars1ub0w Avatar
7 weeks ago
"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 weeks ago

"Biting the hand that feeds you" comes to mind. Apple depends crucially on Samsung.
Apple and Samsung have had legal issues with each other for years. They still conduct a lot of business with each other. This suit by the U.S. DOJ hasn't changed that and won't change their relationship. They both benefit from each other.

Also, Apple is allowed to defend itself in court. The DOJ (and presumably Samsung) has access to internal Apple data through subpoena. What's happening is Apple's attorneys are asking for data from Samsung as part of their defense. Samsung is hiding behind technicalities of international law. They are welcome to do that, but Apple's lawyers should have the access to data to build their case in their defense.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 weeks ago
Good luck with that one Apple... might also want to remember as stated above, Samsung IS a rather important key supplier of yours...
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Happy_John Avatar
7 weeks ago

A little clarification -- this is Apple defending itself against a lawsuit.
Yes, despite how it could be framed, this ISN'T Apple vs Samsung. It's DOJ vs Big Corporation.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)