Apple Faces Lawsuit Over Continuity Camera Patent and Antitrust Claims - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Faces Lawsuit Over Continuity Camera Patent and Antitrust Claims

Apple this week got sued in a New Jersey Federal court by the maker of mobile video app Camo, alleging Apple stole its technology when the company integrated its Continuity Camera feature into iOS 16 in 2022.

continuity camera
Released by London-based Reincubate in 2020, the Camo app enables iPhone and Android smartphones to be used as webcams for desktop-based video calls.

Apple's Continuity Camera serves a similar function within its own ecosystem, allowing an iPhone to be used as a wireless webcam with a nearby Mac that is signed into the same Apple Account.

Reincubate said the tech giant copied patented features from its Camo app and incorporated them into its mobile operating system in order to "redirect user demand to Apple's own platform-tied offering."

According to the lawsuit, Apple "actively induced and encouraged" Reincubate to develop and market Camo for iOS, then later copied its functionality and built it into iOS as Continuity Camera.

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

Reincubate called Apple's conduct an example of "Sherlocking," which refers to Apple building an app or system feature that duplicates functionality previously offered by a third-party app.

"Rather than competing with us, Apple deployed a series of obstacles to tilt the playing field, infringed our IP, and did so in service of preventing competition from rival platforms," Reincubate CEO Aidan Fitzpatrick said in a statement given to Reuters.

"Apple competes fairly while respecting the intellectual property rights of others, and these camera features were developed internally by Apple engineers," Apple responded in a statement.

Aside from accusing Apple of infringing its patents, Reincubate's suit was filed as an antitrust claim, alleging that Apple violates U.S. law by locking users into its ecosystem and preventing them from switching to competitors. Reincubate has requested unspecified monetary damages and court orders that would block Apple's alleged misconduct.

Popular Stories

iPhone 18 Pro Deep Red Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Launching Later This Year With These 12 New Features

Wednesday March 18, 2026 7:39 am PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not expected to launch for another six months or so, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. It was initially reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models would have fully under-screen Face ID, with only a front camera visible in the top-left corner of the screen. However, the latest rumors indicate that only one Face ID component...
ios 26 4 yellow

Here Are Apple's Release Notes for iOS 26.4

Wednesday March 18, 2026 11:56 am PDT by
Apple provided developers and public beta testers with the release candidate versions of iOS 26.4 and iPadOS 26.4, which means we're going to see a public launch as soon as next week. The RC versions of the software include Apple's official release notes, giving us final details on what's included in the update. Apple Music - Playlist Playground (beta) generates a playlist from your...
Apple Logo Sketch Feature

Apple Has Now Unveiled Eight New Products This Month

Tuesday March 17, 2026 9:25 am PDT by
Apple has unveiled a whopping eight new products so far this March, including an iPhone 17e, iPad Air models with the M4 chip, MacBook Air models with the M5 chip, MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the all-new MacBook Neo, an updated Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, and now the AirPods Max 2 this week. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone...

Top Rated Comments

topgunn Avatar
7 weeks ago

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
Which is exactly what you would say if you were bringing a suit against one of the largest tech giants in the world. It doesn't mean it's true.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 weeks ago

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
While their version of events might be true, it’s also possible that it is not true and this lawsuit is completely without merit. Why are the people in the company that instigated that lawsuit automatically more trustworthy than Apple? Do you know them personally and know the history of what really happened?

I think the wisest approach is to withhold judgment until the case is done.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jonnysods Avatar
7 weeks ago
"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 weeks ago

So the maker of the hardware and software for all the products, has to find a no name mom and pops to make its camera work with its own devices? I mean it doesn’t even sound right.
Apple uses a lot of third-party SW to drive its hardware (I worked for a company supplying them and other phone integrators). They usually operate by initially licensing it, but after a couple of years stop paying the license fees, claiming they are using their own SW. That's either a blatant lie, or their own SW is just a crude copy. In this case, they apparently did not even bother licensing.

This is the DNA of Apple. They are so big and wealthy, they use their size to bully small companies. The other large tech companies do the same in their determination to get their own way.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
zarmanto Avatar
7 weeks ago

Can you patent ideas?
As Apple learned, many, many years ago ('https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/partiful-calls-apple-a-copycat-for-new-invites-app.2448774/post-33716922'), the answer to that tends to vary from one idea to the next.

Some life lessons that we all need to learn to appreciate:

* The big guy isn't always the bad guy... but sometimes, they are.
* The little guy isn't always crying wolf... but sometimes, they are.
* Ideas aren't always patentable... but sometimes, they are.
* The situation is almost never as clean and straightforward as armchair litigators wish to believe.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
macdisciple Avatar
7 weeks ago

"In most of those cases, Apple has not actively induced the developer to test and build software," the lawsuit said. "Here, Apple actively cultivated a relationship of trust with Reincubate, induced the company to share technical details, beta builds, and market data, and leveraged that privileged access to inform its own development of Continuity Camera."

That is wild - pure evil tactics.
I mean, maybe, but "victims" will use the most inflammatory language possible in order to win the highest award possible.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)