Apple's Google Gemini Deal Could Be Worth $5 Billion - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple's Google Gemini Deal Could Be Worth $5 Billion

Apple's newly announced partnership with Google to use Gemini models for Siri and Apple Intelligence could be worth as much as $5 billion, according to one analyst's estimate.

Gemini Siri Feature
The deal is structured as a cloud computing contract that will see Apple pay "several billion dollars to Google over time," according to the Financial Times (paywalled), citing a person familiar with the agreement. Gene Munster at Deepwater Asset Management puts the value at $5 billion for Google.

The arrangement is reminiscent of a deal made two decades ago that made Google's search engine the default on Apple devices, which grew to be worth about $20 billion annually to Apple.

Apple said it determined that Google's technology provides the "most capable foundation" for its Apple Foundation Models. However, the Gemini partnership raises questions about the future of Apple's existing ChatGPT integration, which has been part of Apple Intelligence since 2024. Apple said the Google deal does not affect the ChatGPT integration, but Munster expressed skepticism about its long-term prospects.

"I think that the ChatGPT integration is going to die on the vine... having two large models, given the economies of scale, wouldn't make a ton of sense for Apple," he told FT.

A person close to OpenAI told the newspaper that the company had taken "a conscious decision to not become the custom model provider for Apple" last autumn to focus on building its own AI device. That hardware effort is being led by former Apple design chief Jony Ive, who was hired by OpenAI in May 2024 – a move Munster suggested may have soured Apple on a deeper OpenAI partnership.

Despite the $5 billion figure, Apple's Gemini deal is comparatively conservative compared to other companies' AI infrastructure spending. Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta have all committed hundreds of billions of dollars to new AI data centers since ChatGPT launched in 2022, but Apple has kept its investment in physical infrastructure at roughly 3 percent of revenue, according to FT's analysis.

For fiscal 2025, Apple's spending on property, plant, and equipment was $12.7 billion. Compare that to the roughly $90 billion Google is expected to spend this year. One former Apple executive told the FT that the Google deal was "a necessary byproduct of Apple's decision not to 'go big' on its AI investments like its competitors."

The next-generation version of Siri is expected to be introduced with iOS 26.4, which will likely be released to the general public in March or April.

Popular Stories

imac video apple feature

Apple Released Yet Another New Product Today

Friday March 20, 2026 2:39 pm PDT by
Apple has unveiled a whopping nine new products so far this March, including an iPhone 17e, iPad Air models with the M4 chip, MacBook Air models with the M5 chip, MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips, the all-new MacBook Neo, an updated Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, AirPods Max 2, and now the Nike Powerbeats Pro 2. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as...
HomePod mini and Apple TV Sage

New Apple TV and HomePod Mini Remain 'Ready' to Launch

Sunday March 22, 2026 6:33 am PDT by
Apple has unveiled nine new products this month, but the wait continues for the next-generation Apple TV 4K and HomePod mini models. In his Power On newsletter today, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said new versions of the Apple TV and HomePod mini have been "ready" since last year, but he reiterated that Apple has held off on releasing them until the more personalized version of Siri and other...
ios 26 4 pastel

iOS 26.4: Top 10 New Features Coming to Your iPhone

Friday March 20, 2026 2:44 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 isn't the major update with new Siri features that we hoped for, but there are some useful quality of life improvements, and a little bit of fun with an AI playlist generator and new emoji characters. Playlist Playground - Apple Music has a Playlist Playground option that lets you generate playlists from text-based descriptions. You can include moods, feelings, activities, or...

Top Rated Comments

Return Zero Avatar
10 weeks ago
As long as this is based on the same model as Gemini, but completely run on Apple-controlled hardware and unable to communicate with Google, I am 100% OK with this implementation. It'd be the same concept as running a local DeepSeek model... sure it was made by a Chinese company, but if it's not sending any data back to them, who cares? Your iPhone itself was made in China anyway. No matter the model you always have to be aware of bias, hallucinations, censorship, etc. That just comes with the territory.

For selective searching like they have now, I can't stand that we are forced to use chatGPT or nothing. Give us choice where we can have it, and privacy where we can't.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
antiprotest Avatar
10 weeks ago
Even with an LLM handed right to them, Apple might mess this one up too.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 weeks ago
Disappointed to hear that Apple has partnered with that company. With all the information they have collected and are collecting, I let you to imagine what it could do to human mankind.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
code-m Avatar
10 weeks ago

Isn't Gemini also suppose to be a stop gap until Apple get's its own LLM up to snuff?

Or perhaps Tim realizes how far they are behind and given up that approach.
It would cost Apple more than $5 Billion to make Siri capable, this is the most financially sound decision.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Ursadorable Avatar
10 weeks ago
Don't care how much it's worth. I don't want anything Google on my device(s). In terms of worst tech companies in the industry, Google is the most exploitive next to Microsoft. I specifically bought into the Apple ecosystem so I didn't have to deal with Google.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
rp2011 Avatar
10 weeks ago
The best solution for Apple. A lot of people me included called for this exact scenario 2 years ago. Apple does not need a consumer facing LLM or chatbot. Anyone can access their favorite version at a touch of a button and why would they want burn through $100's of billions on something that 1- no one is clamoring for, 2- Are not ready for Prime time, and 3- sucks $100's of billions of dollars from companies without generating anything in return. There is no ROI and the technology is not fully baked yet.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)