Apple Hit With $634 Million Verdict in Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Patent Lawsuit - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Hit With $634 Million Verdict in Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Patent Lawsuit

A U.S. federal jury has ruled that Apple owes medical technology company Masimo $634 million for patent infringement related to the blood oxygen-sensing technology in the Apple Watch, reports Reuters. Apple will appeal the verdict.

apple watch series 6 blood oxygen monitoring 1
"We are pleased by this outcome, and appreciate the time and attention given to our case by the court and the jury," said Masimo in a press release." This is a significant win in our ongoing efforts to protect our innovations and intellectual property, which is crucial to our ability to develop technology that benefits patients. We remain committed to defending our IP rights moving forward."

"Over the past six years (Masimo has) sued Apple in multiple courts and asserted over 25 patents, the majority of which have been found to be invalid," an Apple spokesperson told Reuters. "The single patent in this case expired in 2022, and is specific to historic patient monitoring technology from decades ago."

The patent dispute led to a ban on U.S. sales of Apple Watch with the blood oxygen feature in December 2023. Apple was able to temporarily continue selling the Apple Watch models while an interim stay was in place during an appeal, but the ban was reinstated as of January 18, 2024, and Apple addressed the issue by immediately launching sales of models with the feature disabled in software.

Apple Watch models in the U.S. remained unable to support blood oxygen monitoring for over a year and a half before Apple introduced a workaround in August 2025 with blood oxygen data being processed and displayed on a paired iPhone rather than on the Apple Watch itself, a change that satisfied U.S. Customs regulators that had been charged with enforcing the original ban.

Apple's workaround did not sit well with Masimo, which filed another lawsuit in an attempt to overturn the U.S. Customs decision and once again prevent Apple from selling Apple Watch models with the blood oxygen feature in the U.S., but there has yet to be a ruling in that lawsuit.

Related Roundup: Apple Watch 11
Buyer's Guide: Apple Watch (Caution)

Popular Stories

Schlage Sense Pro

Schlage Launching Sense Pro Door Lock With Hands-Free Unlocking via iPhone or Apple Watch

Tuesday June 16, 2026 10:10 am PDT by
Schlage today announced that the Sense Pro smart deadbolt it unveiled at CES 2025 will finally be available for purchase in the U.S. and Canada beginning June 29, with U.S. pricing set at $399 and Canadian pricing set at $549. The smart deadbolt will be available at Amazon, The Home Depot, Lowe's, and select other retailers. Sense Pro utilizes Ultra Wideband technology to allow for...
apple yoga day activity challenge

Apple Watch Activity Challenge for International Day of Yoga Coming June 21

Tuesday June 16, 2026 11:55 am PDT by
Apple is celebrating International Day of Yoga with an Activity Challenge that takes place on Sunday, June 21. To earn the in-app award, Apple Watch owners must record a yoga workout of 10 minutes or more. Any yoga workout will fulfill the requirement, as long as you select the yoga workout type from the Workout app on the Apple Watch or use an app that adds yoga workouts to the Health app. ...
watchOS 27 Hands On Thumb

Hands-On With watchOS 27: Every New Apple Watch Feature

Thursday June 18, 2026 12:35 pm PDT by
watchOS 27 is the new version of watchOS that's coming to the Apple Watch this fall. It's a little light on features, but there are some useful new additions, including access to Siri AI. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. watchOS 27 will have Siri AI, so you'll be able to use many of the same Siri features that you have on the iPhone on your wrist. Right now, the...

Top Rated Comments

9 months ago

Slimy company that deserves nothing. They don't care about human health, just profits from old technology and lawsuits.
Masimo is a real company that has been operating with these kinds of sensors - and more - long before Apple started this kind of monitoring. I was managing introduction of new systems for patient monitoring, which was using sensors from Masimo (among others) at a new hospital just a couple of weeks ago so they're a large, worldwide company in their sector.

Apple was looking into licensing from Masimo, but chose not to. Instead they hired employees away from Masimo and designed something that was close enough to what Masimo had that several instances has sided with them - and Apple failing with their argument "this is a watch, not a patient monitor. Thus we can use what's described in the patents". I dislike patent trolls more than most and has done so for many decades, but this is not one of these.

Of all the IP cases Apple has had, this is one of the very few where I side with the other side.
Score: 48 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago
It would have been a lot cheaper for Apple - and therefore consumers - had they just paid for the licensing fee, like everyone else.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago

just profits from old technology and lawsuits.
If you don't defend your patents, you lose them.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago
Couldn’t Apple just buy Masimo for less?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago

If you don't defend your patents, you lose them.
That's trademarks, not patents.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
9 months ago

It would have been a lot cheaper for Apple - and therefore consumers - had they just paid for the licensing fee, like everyone else.
Indeed. While I have heard unsubstantiated claims Massimo wanted over $100 per watch, claims based on FRAND patents say this would have been closer to $10-20 per watch.

Evidently this judgement works out to just under $15 per infringing watch.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)