Apple's New Transcription APIs Blow Past Whisper in Speed Tests

Apple's new speech-to-text transcription APIs in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe are delivering dramatically faster speeds compared to rival tools, including OpenAI's Whisper, based on beta testing conducted by MacStories' John Voorhees.

apple record transcribe phone calls

Call recording and transcription in iOS 18.1

Apple uses its own native speech frameworks to power live transcription features in apps like Notes and Voice Memos, as well as phone call transcription in iOS 18.1. To improve efficiency in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe, Apple has introduced a new SpeechAnalyzer class and SpeechTranscriber module that deal with similar requests.

According to Voorhees, the new models processed a 34-minute, 7GB video file in just 45 seconds using a command line tool called Yap (developed by Voorhees' son, Finn). That's a full 55% faster than MacWhisper's Large V3 Turbo model, which took 1 minute and 41 seconds for the same file.

Other Whisper-based tools performed even slower, with VidCap taking 1:55 and MacWhisper's Large V2 model requiring 3:55 to complete the same transcription task. Voorhees also reported no noticeable difference in transcription quality across models.

The speed advantage comes from Apple's on-device processing approach, which avoids the network overhead that typically slows cloud-based transcription services.

While the time difference might seem modest for individual files, Voorhees notes that the performance gain increases exponentially when processing multiple videos or longer content. For anyone generating subtitles or transcribing lectures regularly, the efficiency boost could save them hours.

The Speech framework components are available across iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Vision Pro platforms in the current beta releases. Voorhees expects Apple's transcription technology to eventually replace Whisper as the go-to solution for Mac transcription apps.

Related Roundups: iOS 26, iPadOS 26, macOS 26 Tahoe
Related Forums: iOS 26, macOS Tahoe

Popular Stories

iPhone 17 Pro Blue Feature Tighter Crop

iPhone 17 Pro Launching in Three Months With These 12 New Features

Saturday June 14, 2025 5:45 pm PDT by
The iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max are three months away, and there are plenty of rumors about the devices. Below, we recap key changes rumored for the iPhone 17 Pro models as of June 2025:Aluminum frame: iPhone 17 Pro models are rumored to have an aluminum frame, whereas the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro models have a titanium frame, and the iPhone X through iPhone 14 Pro have a...
apple watch ultra 2 new black

Apple Watch Ultra 3 Finally Coming After Two-Year Hiatus

Monday June 16, 2025 8:45 am PDT by
Apple will finally deliver the Apple Watch Ultra 3 sometime this year, according to analyst Jeff Pu of GF Securities Hong Kong (via @jukanlosreve). The analyst expects both the Apple Watch Series 11 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 to arrive this year (likely alongside the new iPhone 17 lineup, if previous launches are anything to go by), according to his latest product roadmap shared with...
apple watch ultra snow

6 Features Coming to the Apple Watch Ultra 3

Tuesday February 25, 2025 9:00 am PST by
The Apple Watch Ultra 3 is expected to launch later this year, arriving two years after the previous model with a series of improvements. While no noticeable design changes are expected for the third generation since the company tends to stick with the same Apple Watch design through three generations before changing it, there are a series of internal upgrades on the way. By the time the ...
terminal macos tahoe

Apple's Terminal App Gets Colorful Redesign in macOS Tahoe

Monday June 16, 2025 4:12 am PDT by
Apple's Terminal app is getting a visual refresh in macOS Tahoe, and it's the first notable design update since the command-line tool debuted. The updated Terminal will support 24-bit color and Powerline fonts, according to Apple's State of the Platforms presentation at WWDC25. The app will also adopt the new Liquid Glass aesthetic with redesigned themes that align with macOS 26's broader...
Logitech Logo Feature

Logitech Announces Two New Accessories for WWDC

Friday June 13, 2025 7:22 am PDT by
Alongside WWDC this week, Logitech announced notable new accessories for the iPad and Apple Vision Pro. The Logitech Muse is a spatially-tracked stylus developed for use with the Apple Vision Pro. Introduced during the WWDC 2025 keynote address, Muse is intended to support the next generation of spatial computing workflows enabled by visionOS 26. The device incorporates six degrees of...
iPadOS 26 App Windowing

Apple Explains Why iPads Don't Just Run macOS

Friday June 13, 2025 7:46 am PDT by
iPadOS 26 allows iPads to function much more like Macs, with a new app windowing system, a swipe-down menu bar at the top of the screen, and more. However, Apple has stopped short of allowing iPads to run macOS, and it has now explained why. In an interview this week with Swiss tech journalist Rafael Zeier, Apple's software engineering chief Craig Federighi said that iPadOS 26's new Mac-like ...
iphone 16 pro models 1

17 Reasons to Wait for the iPhone 17

Thursday June 12, 2025 8:58 am PDT by
Apple's iPhone development roadmap runs several years into the future and the company is continually working with suppliers on several successive iPhone models simultaneously, which is why we often get rumored features months ahead of launch. The iPhone 17 series is no different, and we already have a good idea of what to expect from Apple's 2025 smartphone lineup. If you skipped the iPhone...
iOS 26 on Three iPhones

Apple Says iOS 26 Won't Be Available on These iPhone Models

Tuesday June 10, 2025 6:58 am PDT by
Apple this week revealed that iOS 26 is compatible with the iPhone 11 series and newer. That means that iOS 18 is the end of the road for the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR, which were all released in 2018. However, those devices will continue to receive security updates for at least a few more years. iOS 26 is compatible with the following iPhone models: iPhone 16e iPhone...

Top Rated Comments

Big_D Avatar
5 hours ago at 04:10 am
Impressive, if it is accurate. What the story doesn't mention is how accurate each of those transcriptions was? Were they all identical? Did one or other have more mistakes? What is the accuracy percentage for each one, and how badly wrong were those mistakes?

I'm not trying to defend ChatGPT, just the speed is a single metric, which isn't very useful if the results are garbage. If the Apple one is faster and more accurate, that is incredible, faster and as accurate, impressive, faster but full of errors, not really that useful.

Hopefully it is the first one: it is faster and more accurate.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
neuropsychguy Avatar
5 hours ago at 04:28 am

Impressive, if it is accurate. What the story doesn't mention is how accurate each of those transcriptions was? Were they all identical? Did one or other have more mistakes? What is the accuracy percentage for each one, and how badly wrong were those mistakes?

I'm not trying to defend ChatGPT, just the speed is a single metric, which isn't very useful if the results are garbage. If the Apple one is faster and more accurate, that is incredible, faster and as accurate, impressive, faster but full of errors, not really that useful.

Hopefully it is the first one: it is faster and more accurate.
Nothing scientific, but in the MacStories post: "What stood out above all else was Yap’s speed. By harnessing SpeechAnalyzer and SpeechTranscriber on-device, the command line tool tore through the 7GB video file a full 55% faster than MacWhisper’s Large V3 Turbo model, with no noticeable difference in transcription quality."

It would be good to see more formal comparisons with data you suggested. Also, it would be good to know what computer John was using for the test.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Big_D Avatar
5 hours ago at 04:31 am

Impressive, if it is accurate.
OK, I read the original article, they all had similar problems with the podcast name, AppStories, writing it as two words instead of CamelCasing it, which is acceptable, and they all had similar problems with people's names. But the Apple tools weren't any less accurate, despite being much faster.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jmonster Avatar
5 hours ago at 04:21 am
Not mentioning accuracy at all implies it's not. Lots of models are faster than O3, but they're not better.

This is just silly getting sillier. Write something meaningful.

Whisper works in real time. Anything faster is irrelevant for iOS.

And saying it's because network overhead? When you can run OpenAI's whisper locally?....... mhm.

This is a blatant advertisement just regurgitating apples marketing bullets.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
5 hours ago at 04:26 am
Speech-to-text is a good use case for on-device processing, but yes, accuracy is an important question, not to mention (multi-)language support.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
d4cloo Avatar
5 hours ago at 04:37 am
Yeah sure, but this doesn't mean anything. Whisper can understand an Irishman singing a traditional folklore song. Can Apple's model do that? And to what degree of success?

Accuracy is incredibly important. They should define criteria other than speed, and measure against those. Only then 'speed' becomes a useful parameter to test.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)