Skip to Content

Researcher Breaches Systems of Over 35 Companies, Including Apple, Microsoft, and PayPal

A security researcher was able to breach the internal systems of over 35 major companies, including Apple, Microsoft, and PayPal, using a software supply chain attack (via Bleeping Computer).

paypal hack

Security researcher Alex Birsan was able to exploit a unique design flaw in some open-source ecosystems called "dependency confusion" to attack the systems of companies such as Apple, Microsoft, PayPal, Shopify, Netflix, Yelp, Tesla, and Uber.

The attack involved uploading malware to open source repositories including PyPI, npm, and RubyGems, which were then automatically distributed downstream into the various companies' internal applications. Victims automatically received the malicious packages, with no social engineering or trojans required.

Birsan was able to create counterfeit projects using the same names on open-source repositories, each containing a disclaimer message, and found that applications would automatically pull public dependency packages, without needing any action from the developer. In some cases, such as with PyPI packages, any package with a higher version would be prioritized regardless of wherever it was located. This enabled Birsan to successfully attack the software supply chain of multiple companies.

Upon verifying that his component had successfully infiltrated the corporate network, Birsan reported his findings to the company in question, and some rewarded him with a bug bounty. Microsoft awarded him its highest bug bounty amount of $40,000 and released a white paper on this security issue, while Apple told BleepingComputer that Birsan will receive a reward via the Apple Security Bounty program for responsibly disclosing the issue. Birsan has now earned over $130,000 through bug bounty programs and pre-approved penetration testing arrangements.

A full explanation of the methodology behind the attack is available at Alex Birsan's Medium page.

Popular Stories

MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...
imac video apple feature

Apple Unveils Seven New Products

Friday March 6, 2026 11:48 am PST by
Apple this week unveiled seven products, including an iPhone 17e, an iPad Air with the M4 chip, updated MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models, a new Studio Display, a higher-end Studio Display XDR, and an all-new MacBook Neo that starts at just $599. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone 16e, but it gains Apple's A19 chip, MagSafe for magnetic wireless charging and magnetic...
Apple MacBook Pro M4 hero

Apple Planning 'MacBook Ultra' With Touchscreen and Higher Price

Sunday March 8, 2026 8:05 am PDT by
Apple is planning to launch an all-new "MacBook Ultra" model this year, featuring an OLED display, touchscreen, and a higher price point, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Gurman revealed the information in his latest "Power On" newsletter. While Apple has been widely expected to launch new M6-series MacBook Pro models with OLED displays, touchscreen functionality, and a new, thinner design...

Top Rated Comments

hybrid_x Avatar
66 months ago
I love that ethical hackers can actually earn a decent income through bug bounty programs.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
66 months ago
Well played sir, well played!

I'm glad companies have bounty programs to encourage the "good guys" to report vulnerabilities. I have no idea how much time he put into the exploit but 130k is a nice payday.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Stephen.R Avatar
66 months ago

People put too much trust in open-source community and software and this is the price they pay.
the irony of your statement is superb.

if the packages he spoofed had been open source he wouldn’t have been able to pull it off - it worked specifically because the companies were referencing internal/private packages (thus not open source) and he was able to make fake packages with the same name, in open source package repositories.

This type of shenanigans is just another reason why you should always vendor your dependencies kids.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Kabeyun Avatar
66 months ago
This reminds me of the Russians hacking SolarWinds. Don’t get to the companies, get to the software the companies use and trust. Of course the irony is that these companies are some of the same ones that have been spending years trying to teach us not to automatically trust downloaded software.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Blackstick Avatar
66 months ago
Well, time to hire this guy...
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
66 months ago

People put too much trust in open-source community and software and this is the price they pay.

Open-source software, unless independently audited, have no guarantees of being secure (or even functional). Remember the disclaimer “this software is provided ‘AS IS’...”

They might even contain malicious code, since very few people will actually read the code before executing it.
The issue isn't open source - it's in the distribution model of software dependencies. This vulnerability has been known for quite some time.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)