Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Planning to Change 30/70 Pricing Formula for In-App Media Subscriptions

appstoreApple is planning to alter its pricing formula for subscriptions in a major change that will benefit subscription-based apps and services like Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, and more, reports Financial Times. Apple is said to be considering changing the 30 percent fee that it currently charges and is discussing new commercial terms with media companies.

At the current point in time, all apps and in-app subscriptions work on a 30/70 split. Apple gets 30 percent of what's paid for an app or service, while the company or developer offering the app gets a 70 percent cut. That means when someone purchases Netflix through the Netflix iOS app, Apple gets over $2 of the fee paid. At the same time, Apple has disallowed direct links to outside subscription sign up services within apps, ensuring it gets its fee.

Apple's 30 percent subscription cut has been a sticking point for many companies, especially those with tight margins like music services, and it's gotten Apple into hot water in the past, most notably during the e-book price fixing case levied against it by the U.S. Department of Justice.

According to the Financial Times, changing the App Store subscription terms could make Apple devices more appealing to content creators while also lessening potential pressure from regulators.

Changing the App Store's terms of trade could improve the economics of online content businesses and reassure regulators that the company is not abusing its position as gatekeeper to one of the world's most lucrative digital marketplaces.

On the Apple TV, Apple is already offering a more generous split, taking just 15 percent of revenue generated from subscription services like the recently released HBO Now.

There are no specifics on the terms that Apple is potentially considering for companies that offer subscription services, but it appears that the price cuts at this time will not extend to standalone apps.

Popular Stories

iOS App Store General Feature Black

Apple Faces New App Store Complaint From Chinese Developers

Tuesday June 23, 2026 8:51 am PDT by
A group of 48 China-based iOS developers have filed an antitrust complaint against Apple with the country's market regulator over the App Store's commission rates, the South China Morning Post reports. The developers sent an open letter to China's State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), alleging that Apple failed to deliver on a promise to offer the lowest commission rate to the...
Apple Acquires Award Winning App Play Feature

Apple Acquires Award-Winning App 'Play'

Monday June 29, 2026 7:39 am PDT by
In February, Apple notified the European Commission that it would be acquiring certain assets from and have the right to hire certain employees from Rabbit 3 Times, the company behind the award-winning app design tool Play. The notification was published on the European Commission's website this week, following a four-month waiting period. Play was a Mac and iPhone app that allowed designers ...
app store blue banner uk fixed

UK Pushes Apple to Loosen App Store Payment and NFC Rules

Tuesday June 30, 2026 3:00 am PDT by
The U.K.'s competition regulator has proposed letting app developers direct users to payment options outside Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store, in a move aimed at increasing competition and reducing the fees charged by the two companies. As reported by Reuters, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said the proposals would remove restrictions that currently prevent U.K....

Top Rated Comments

AngerDanger Avatar
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
If you find yourself unsatisfied with any information obtained on MR, simply returned the unused portions for a full refund. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Crosscreek Avatar
145 months ago
Gwad, I hope Apple doesn't go broke doing this.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SgtPepper12 Avatar
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
145 months ago
This is one of the weirdest things I've ever read on these forums. I don't even know where to start.
A challenger appears!
So how about 0%, what they deserve for services that run completely independently from them?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
Yeah because developers don't use MacRumors...
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
furi0usbee Avatar
145 months ago
This should really be between the developers and Apple. Why does this need to be public information? It's not going to stop me from purchasing my apps one way or another.
??? Why would this information need to be private?
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)