Got a tip for us? Share it...

New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Samsung Said to Follow Apple's Lead with Fingerprint Sensor, No Iris Scanner in Galaxy S5

Previous rumors hinted that Samsung's next flagship device would leapfrog the iPhone 5s with new iris scanning technology, but that rumor may be inaccurate. A recent report from The Korea Herald claims the Korean handset maker instead is working on fingerprint sensor technology for its upcoming flagship Galaxy S5 phone.
"Among the different types of biometric sensors that Samsung is testing for its Galaxy S5, the tech giant will go for fingerprint authentication rather than unintuitive user experience of iris recognition," said an industry source who declined to be named.

"Who would want to put their handset up close to their eyes for authentication in places like movie theaters and bed, or even while they are driving?," the industry source added.
upek_fingerprint_sensor_2
Samsung Vice President Lee Young-hee said in a recent Bloomberg interview that the company was looking into the possibility of using an iris scanner, but can't confirm that the technology would be incorporated into the Galaxy S5.
“Many people are fanatical about iris recognition technology. We are studying the possibility but can’t really say whether we will have it or not on the S5.”
The Korea Herald report cites industry sources who claim the iris scanning technology would provide an unfamiliar and uncomfortable user experience. It also is technically challenging as it would require a long-range camera, in addition to a rear camera and a front-facing camera. The inclusion of three camera modules would force Samsung to redesign both the internal layout and form factor of its Galaxy S phones.

Apple has also been rumored to be working on iris scanning functionality, but industry insiders predict it will take several years before a single camera module will be able to serve dual functions as a front-facing camera and an iris scanner. In the interim, manufacturers like Samsung are expected to adopt display-wide fingerprint scanners that would unlock a phone by allowing a user to tap on the screen. Apple has revealed its own interest in such technology, including the ability to turn display areas corresponding to app icons such as those for banking or email apps into fingerprint sensors.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

26 weeks ago

You think Apple invented fingerprint scan security?


No, but just like multi touch, App Store, Siri, and dozens of countless features, they were the first to put it in a useful package rather than geeky proof of concepts, and that's what samsung copies; not technology itself as much as practicality of technology
Rating: 35 Votes
26 weeks ago
5s ... S5
Rating: 28 Votes
26 weeks ago
"Who would want to put their handset up close to their eyes for authentication in places like movie theaters and bed, or even while they are driving?," the industry source added.

Using the phone in a movie theatre or the car? these are the people that should be restricted from all forms of technology!
Rating: 26 Votes
26 weeks ago

You think Apple invented fingerprint scan security?


That's pretty unfair as a comment: I agree with you that there is no way that Apple will actually be able to sue over Samsung playing copycat with a fingerprint sensor, but just look at the first Android implementation of a fingerprint scanner. Its clumsy, on the back, smudges the camera every time you use it, inaccurate and pretty unpleasant to use.

At the same time Apple brings out a solution which is always there, working in the background, very easy to set up and impressively accurate. All of a sudden Android manufacturers are like "oh yeah, that's obviously how we would have implemented a fingerprint sensor in an intuitive, non-gimmicky way" and bring it straight to their phones. HTC will pretend their first fingerprint phone never even happened and that Apple's way was always what they planned to do.

I like competition, I like certain things that Android manufacturers do, less so Samsung but the HTC One is a gorgeous phone and the Nexus 4 and 5 are both outstanding value for money, but its things like this, like that internal Samsung document that leaked showing Samsung trying to make their user experience more iPhone-like that REALLY hacks me off.
Rating: 15 Votes
26 weeks ago
Samsung is working on a phone with a fingerprint scanner & brighter OS.

Here’s a photo of their prototype:
Rating: 13 Votes
26 weeks ago

Apple's legal team is the big winner here?


You think Apple invented fingerprint scan security?
Rating: 8 Votes
26 weeks ago
Am I the only one who would rather not have to gouge out an eyeball out or chop a finger off if my phone turns out to have a security flaw?

Given a choice, I would much prefer a device with no biometric systems in it at all.
Rating: 8 Votes
26 weeks ago
They forgot to mention that unlike the iPhone, there won't be a 4 digit pin code required. So if your finger doesn't scan, well, too bad, you can't access your phone.
Rating: 8 Votes
26 weeks ago
No surprise here. Samsung is a copying company. Even before Apple their strategy was to copy the market leader in a given industry and make similar products at a cheaper price. It works for them. I don't buy any of their products though. It's mostly of lower quality and I've had a few bad experiences with them.
Rating: 6 Votes
26 weeks ago

Right, Xerox management took the R&D ideas their own team developed and created a sales winning personal computing revolution that swept the world over the last thirty years. Changing how everyone on the planet interacts with their computing devices. Yup, i still recall the early days of the Xerox PC, how it made inroads in all other computing platforms. How even early scoffers later adopted the interface as their own. And how today Xerox is a world leader in computing devices. .........Steps back into multi universe phase shifting portal .......presses return to reality button and disappears .......


You know, the first GUI computer made by Apple, The Lisa, cost almost exactly the same amount as the Xerox Star, and didn't sell that much more. The Macintosh also didn't set the world on fire saleswise. It was a modest success for its first year, then sales dropped sharply for it afterwards.

When you look at the first Mac from outside Apple world, it was a great precursor device, but not the world changing machine it's made out to be.
Rating: 6 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]