Apple Ordered to Stagger E-Book Contract Negotiations, Refrain From 'Most Favored Nation' Clauses - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Ordered to Stagger E-Book Contract Negotiations, Refrain From 'Most Favored Nation' Clauses

iBooks.pngJudge Denise Cote today issued her penalty ruling in the e-book pricing suit against Apple, ruling that Apple must stagger its contract negotiations with major publishers to prevent collusion and avoid entering into "most favored nation" (MFN) agreements with any publisher for five years, according to GigaOM. The MFN clauses in Apple's contracts with publishers prevented any other e-book retailer from undercutting Apple, giving Apple the right to at least match the best pricing offered by other retailers.

Judge Cote’s injunction forbids Apple from enforcing most-favored-nation clauses in any ebook publishing contracts for five years, and also forbids the company from entering into any book publishing contracts that contain them for five years. Apple had wanted this provision to be less broad, relating only to MFN clauses with the five publishers in the case who have already settled. Instead, it applies to all publishers.

Judge Cote defined the order in which Apple will be permitted to renegotiate contracts with publishers, beginning with Hachette 24 months after the judgment's effective date and staggering negotiations every six months thereafter for the five publishers involved in the case.

Apple is also required to hire an external compliance monitor to ensure that the company is complying with antitrust requirements.

In a win for Apple, Cote's ruling does not require the company to allow the return of direct store links from competing e-book distributors in their App Store apps, something the U.S. Department of Justice had requested in its proposed penalties.

Apple continues to deny that it engaged in price fixing, and is pursuing an appeal of the guilty verdict.

Popular Stories

iphone 17 pro dark blue 1

Apple Preparing 'Most Significant Overhaul in the iPhone's History'

Sunday March 29, 2026 8:18 am PDT by
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has high expectations for Apple's first foldable iPhone. In his Power On newsletter today, he said the foldable iPhone will be "the most significant overhaul in the iPhone's history." "iPhone 4, iPhone 6 and iPhone X were clearly a big deal, but this is a whole new design," he said. Like Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold 7, the foldable iPhone will reportedly open up like ...
Apple Event Logo

Apple to Launch These 15+ New Products Later This Year

Friday March 27, 2026 2:03 pm PDT by
March has been an incredibly busy month for Apple, with the company unveiling more than 10 new products and accessories. We said hello to the MacBook Neo at the start of the month, and we bid farewell to the Mac Pro at the end of it. Nevertheless, there is still a lot more to come this year. Beyond the usual annual updates to iPhones and Apple Watches, Apple's all-new smart home hub is...
Apple Apps Grid

Apple Releasing Two New iPhone Apps This Year

Saturday March 28, 2026 8:00 am PDT by
Apple is expected to release two new iPhone apps this year, including an Apple Business app and a Siri app with chatbot-like functionality. With the Apple Business app, employees at businesses using the new Apple Business platform will be able to install apps for work, view contact information for colleagues, and request support. Apple Business is launching on April 14, and it replaces Apple ...

Top Rated Comments

DipDog3 Avatar
164 months ago
Actually these punishments are not too bad. I think Apple should just accept these and move on.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
164 months ago
In one sense, they got the book thrown at them
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Rafagon Avatar
164 months ago
DOJ you have bigger problems than Apple

DOJ sure seems to have a lot of free time on their hands... worrying about ebook sales and pricing...
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
164 months ago
Government is overreaching here, by telling a corporation what they can and cannot do.

If the law is clear, Apple has to abide by it and if they don't they should get fined every time they break it until they do.

Anything else is not the DOJ's or a judges business.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
PracticalMac Avatar
164 months ago
Win for the most dominant eBook retailer Amazon?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
164 months ago
DOJ sure seems to have a lot of free time on their hands... worrying about ebook sales and pricing...

I know. When you consider the tons of other significantly worse behavior that goes on in American corporations completely unchecked, its actually pretty pathetic they go full-blast on a stupid little e-book case but don't give that same treatment to the scum oligopolists like big oil companies, or the telephone carriers who almost certainly engage in price fixing as well AND have an oligopoly. However, allow publishers to raise ebook prices 3 dollars, and you'll get swarmed by Uncle Sam.

America the Beautiful.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)