Got a tip for us? Share it...

Office for Mac 2011 to Be 32-Bit Only

In a blog post yesterday describing the Microsoft team's attendance at Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference, Microsoft MacBU's Jake Hoelter reveals that the company's forthcoming Office for Mac 2011 will be a 32-bit only release. Hoelter blames the lack of a 64-bit version of the next-generation productivity suite on the need for his team to focus on compatibility between Windows and Mac versions of Office, a focus that has prevented Microsoft from fully transitioning Office to the Cocoa API required for 64-bit.

In Office 2011, we've made investments in better compatibility between Office for Mac and Windows Office, which is the largest request we receive from customers. We think we have some outstanding improvements to show you in this area, and we'll continue to share details in coming weeks. Our work to increase compatibility means we haven't completed the transition of moving the entire user interface over to Cocoa yet. And because Apple's frameworks require us to complete the move to Cocoa before we can build a 64-bit version, Office 2011 will be 32-bit only.

Hoelter notes that the primary difference between a 32-bit and a 64-bit version of Office would be memory availability, but that the vast majority of users do not work with large enough documents and files for performance to be an issue on 32-bit versions. Those users working with very large files, such as "Excel files with data in millions of cells, or PowerPoint presentations with thousands of high resolution images", would, however, experience a performance hit working in 32-bit.

Office for Mac 2011 is scheduled to ship by the end of this year. The company has released several beta versions, with the most recent one issued a few weeks ago revealing that the company is beginning to finalize the look of the release with new icons and graphics.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

22 months ago
Can't wait to watch the chorus of "OMG this is 2010... why can't I type my essay in 64-bit????" make themselves look foolish.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
Well!

There goes one of the biggest reasons to upgrade down the drain.

Not a big MS Word user, but would have considered getting it for the school teacher wife.

p.s. The current version is a hog.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
Is Office for the PC 32-bit ?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
FAIL!... I'll stick with iWork it fits my needs.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
Glad to hear they are focusing more on compatibility between the Windows and Mac versions. It would be nice to share files without any glitches......
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
Not a huge deal, but I expect the whiners to come out in full force. Since most people I deal with can't even read .docx files, I might as well still have Office 2004.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
I just hope its faster. I swear Office 2008 runs just as slow as Office 2004 under Rosetta. Especially the slow load times.

I was hoping a full transition to Cocoa which would speed it up, but it sounds like they haven't done that. So more than likely more slow bloated junk as usual.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
Okay, so who in this thread works with gigantic PowerPoint presentations or huge Excel files?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
In other words, MS was too lazy to hire more SDE for this project.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
It just doesn't matter. At all.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]