Got a tip for us? Share it...

Workers Suing iPhone Manufacturing Partner Over Chemical Poisoning

Barron's points to a research report from Stratfor Global Intelligence noting that 44 Chinese workers are preparing to file a lawsuit against LCD manufacturer Wintek after dozens of workers have been hospitalized due to poisoning from n-hexane used to clean iPhone screens.

Stratfor notes that at least 62 Wintek workers have been hospitalized since August 2009 due to n-hexane poisoning, a chemical "which can cause nerve damage and sometimes paralysis."

The note also cites media reports claiming that the factory manager had forced the company's workers to use the chemical instead of a safer alcohol product because of either faster drying times or reduced streakiness.

The Stratfor post says that according to some media reports, the factory manager in Suzhou made the workers use the chemical because it dries faster than alcohol, while other reports said it was used because it leaves fewer streaks than alcohol. The piece notes that the factory manager has since been fired.

The Stratfor article also claims that reports have suggested that the change to using n-hexane was made at Apple's request.

In addition to the iPhone, Wintek has been a primary supplier of touchscreens for the iPad. "Manufacturing bottlenecks" at the company have been blamed for tight supplies of the iPad, although a report has suggested that Apple is shifting even more production to the company as other partners have also struggled with delays.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

26 months ago
Interesting... I wonder if Apple will weigh in on this one.

You would think they would have masks to prevent something like this, or it would be in their contracts for required safety equipment.

I believe the poisoning scare was originally reported here.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
If Apple did ask them to use n-hexane, they'll probably just say "We asked them to use it, but it's their responsibility to take the safety precautions."
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago

You would think they would have masks to prevent something like this, or it would be in their contracts for required safety equipment.


Who's contract? Apple's contract with Wintek or the employee's contract with Wintek?

I would guess that Apple's contract with Wintek would include all of the required verbage stating what environmental and occupations safety standards are required. In this case, my guess is that Wintek was falling behind on schedule or they weren't meeting quality standards, so the manager switched to the n-hexane.

As for the employee's having a contract, I highly doubt it. I don't think there are Unions over in China ... but I could be wrong.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago

Who's contract? Apple's contract with Wintek or the employee's contract with Wintek? I would guess that Apple's contract with Wintek would include all of the required verbage stating what environmental and occupations safety standards are required. In this case, my guess is that Wintek was falling behind on schedule or they weren't meeting quality standards, so the manager switched to the n-hexane. As for the employee's having a contract, I highly doubt it. I don't think there are Unions over in China ... but I could be wrong.

Apple's contract.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
It's not the n-hexane, it's the lead paint covered facility they work in, silly.
:)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago

If Apple did ask them to use n-hexane, they'll probably just say "We asked them to use it, but it's their responsibility to take the safety precautions."


Or Apple said gave a mandate like "There are streaks all over the glass. Do something about that". And that was the manufacturers cheap answer.

However, the fact that it was a manager that was fired makes me think it was a relatively low level implementation of either safety precautions or choice of cleaner that brought this about. If it really was a mandate by Apple and the company couldn't have been any safer, they would be pointing their fingers loud and clear at Apple, not firing managers.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
Reminds me of Christopher Walken in "The Rundown" talking about the horrendous conditions his mine workers are subjected to:

Where you see Hell, I see a spellbinding sense of purpose. I see the value of keeping your eye on the ball. When a bride slips the ring on her finger, when a businessman lays his hands on a Rolex, when a rapper gets a shiny new tooth, this is that cost, Mr. Beck, my horror for their beauty, my Hell for their little slice of Heaven. Somebody's gotta keep his eye on the ball. That somebody is me, Mr. Beck. I am down here every day, keeping my eye on the ball. That's just a simple fact of life. And if you're bold enough to face that cold hard fact... you can make a lot of money.

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago

Or Apple said gave a mandate like "There are streaks all over the glass. Do something about that". And that was the manufacturers cheap answer.

However, the fact that it was a manager that was fired makes me think it was a relatively low level implementation of either safety precautions or choice of cleaner that brought this about. If it really was a mandate by Apple and the company couldn't have been any safer, they would be pointing their fingers loud and clear at Apple, not firing managers.


Yeah, because the person who makes the decision ALWAYS takes the fall when something goes wrong.

/sarcasm
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
Arn,

is there the possibility to create a 'Page 3' or something for all legal news?
This is actually REALLY boring to read.


Thanks,
speedy_2
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
The most amazing part of this story is that Chinese workers are allowed to file lawsuits.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]