Workers Suing iPhone Manufacturing Partner Over Chemical Poisoning

Stratfor notes that at least 62 Wintek workers have been hospitalized since August 2009 due to n-hexane poisoning, a chemical "which can cause nerve damage and sometimes paralysis."
The note also cites media reports claiming that the factory manager had forced the company's workers to use the chemical instead of a safer alcohol product because of either faster drying times or reduced streakiness.The Stratfor post says that according to some media reports, the factory manager in Suzhou made the workers use the chemical because it dries faster than alcohol, while other reports said it was used because it leaves fewer streaks than alcohol. The piece notes that the factory manager has since been fired.
The Stratfor article also claims that reports have suggested that the change to using n-hexane was made at Apple's request.In addition to the iPhone, Wintek has been a primary supplier of touchscreens for the iPad. "Manufacturing bottlenecks" at the company have been blamed for tight supplies of the iPad, although a report has suggested that Apple is shifting even more production to the company as other partners have also struggled with delays.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)You would think they would have masks to prevent something like this, or it would be in their contracts for required safety equipment.
I believe the poisoning scare was originally reported here.
You would think they would have masks to prevent something like this, or it would be in their contracts for required safety equipment.
Who's contract? Apple's contract with Wintek or the employee's contract with Wintek?
I would guess that Apple's contract with Wintek would include all of the required verbage stating what environmental and occupations safety standards are required. In this case, my guess is that Wintek was falling behind on schedule or they weren't meeting quality standards, so the manager switched to the n-hexane.
As for the employee's having a contract, I highly doubt it. I don't think there are Unions over in China ... but I could be wrong.
Who's contract? Apple's contract with Wintek or the employee's contract with Wintek? I would guess that Apple's contract with Wintek would include all of the required verbage stating what environmental and occupations safety standards are required. In this case, my guess is that Wintek was falling behind on schedule or they weren't meeting quality standards, so the manager switched to the n-hexane. As for the employee's having a contract, I highly doubt it. I don't think there are Unions over in China ... but I could be wrong.
Apple's contract.:)
If Apple did ask them to use n-hexane, they'll probably just say "We asked them to use it, but it's their responsibility to take the safety precautions."
Or Apple said gave a mandate like "There are streaks all over the glass. Do something about that". And that was the manufacturers cheap answer.
However, the fact that it was a manager that was fired makes me think it was a relatively low level implementation of either safety precautions or choice of cleaner that brought this about. If it really was a mandate by Apple and the company couldn't have been any safer, they would be pointing their fingers loud and clear at Apple, not firing managers.
Where you see Hell, I see a spellbinding sense of purpose. I see the value of keeping your eye on the ball. When a bride slips the ring on her finger, when a businessman lays his hands on a Rolex, when a rapper gets a shiny new tooth, this is that cost, Mr. Beck, my horror for their beauty, my Hell for their little slice of Heaven. Somebody's gotta keep his eye on the ball. That somebody is me, Mr. Beck. I am down here every day, keeping my eye on the ball. That's just a simple fact of life. And if you're bold enough to face that cold hard fact... you can make a lot of money.
Or Apple said gave a mandate like "There are streaks all over the glass. Do something about that". And that was the manufacturers cheap answer.
However, the fact that it was a manager that was fired makes me think it was a relatively low level implementation of either safety precautions or choice of cleaner that brought this about. If it really was a mandate by Apple and the company couldn't have been any safer, they would be pointing their fingers loud and clear at Apple, not firing managers.
Yeah, because the person who makes the decision ALWAYS takes the fall when something goes wrong.
/sarcasm
is there the possibility to create a 'Page 3' or something for all legal news?
This is actually REALLY boring to read.
Thanks,
speedy_2
[ Read All Comments ]

Our sister-site TouchArcade notes that Chillingo's excellent physics puzzler Feed Me Oil is free today for both the iPhone and iPad. It's normally $0.99 for iPhone and $1.99 for iPad....
Several years ago, Comcast began instituting bandwidth caps of 250GB per month on its residential customers. In 2008, this was plenty for most customers, but with the advent of streaming video...
Reuters reports that China Mobile Chairman Xi Guohua has once again publicly stated that the world's largest mobile phone carrier is engaged in talks with Apple about offering the iPhone to its...
Apple has filed a motion to dismiss in a case filed by customers over alleged misleading advertising depicting the Siri technology in the iPhone 4S. The lawsuit, filed in March, alleges that...
The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ASCI) today released its latest rankings of customer satisfaction in the United States for mobile phones and a number of products and services, with the new...