Got a tip for us? Share it...

Schiller on iPhone Unlocks and Incompatibility

Apple's Phil Schiller was quoted by an Associated Press article about today's announcement that SIM Unlocked iPhones may become permanently disabled by upcoming iPhone updates.

Schiller clarifies that this is not an intentional move to disable unlocked iPhones:

''This has nothing to do with proactively disabling a phone that is unlocked or hacked,'' Phil Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, said in an interview. ''It's unfortunate that some of these programs have caused damage to the iPhone software, but Apple cannot be responsible for ... those consequences.''


To clarify, this appears to affect iPhones that have been specifically SIM Unlocked to use other carrier SIM cards besides AT&T. iPhones otherwise "hacked" to install 3rd party applications are unlikely to be affected in the same manner.

There has already been one tutorial on how to relock your iPhone. We'll be posting coverage of apps, tools, tutorials at our iPhone blog.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

57 months ago
anybody surprised by this?

Apple is doing what is the right thing.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago
"My pals Guido and Luigi here, they suggest you pay us. You know, to protect you. This has nothing to do with proactively jumpin' you, or nothin'. I'm just saying... it'd be real unfortunate if anything happened to you, is all..."
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago
no intentional sabotage to hackers. This is merely a warning.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago

[url=http://www.macrumors.com]Schiller clarifies that this is not an intentional move to disable unlocked iPhones.


Ha. I'm anti-unlocking and even I don't believe that. Anybody wonder why it's *all* the unlock software and methods, but *none* of the third-party applications and installer hacks that have "damaged the iPhone's software". Note, damaged to the point that it *cannot ever be restored*?!?!?!? Please, it's intentional. Has to be. They just can't tell a customer base they'd intentionally break something to keep it locked down.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago

"My pals Guido and Luigi here, they suggest you pay us. You know, to protect you. This has nothing to do with proactively jumpin' you, or nothin'. I'm just saying... it'd be real unfortunate if anything happened to you, is all..."


Now *that* is about the perfect translation of Schiller's statement.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago
That sounds about right... At least they aren't actively punishing those who are increasing the abilities of the iPhone for the general population just the ones who are buying 500 iPhones and selling them in China.

I think it's a very fair move on Apple's part.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago

That sounds about right... At least they aren't actively punishing those who are increasing the abilities of the iPhone for the general population just the ones who are buying 500 iPhones and selling them in China.

I think it's a very fair move on Apple's part.


Sorry my friend but I don't think ANYBODY is buying iPhones to ship to china because china already has their own iPhone:eek::eek:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago
to clarify, this is NOT a New York Times story. It's an Associated Press story that happens to be on the NYT site.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago
they should sell this product free of any contract ...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
57 months ago

That sounds about right... At least they aren't actively punishing those who are increasing the abilities of the iPhone for the general population just the ones who are buying 500 iPhones and selling them in China.

I think it's a very fair move on Apple's part.


You mean Canda, not China. Toronto has more iPhone users per capida then any other city in the world, and ALL of them are unlocked. Due to a spat between apple and rogers, we wont be getting the iPhone legally up here for a while, and so we'll continue to hack away! (even if it means we have 2 wait to update our software).
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]