Apple Faces Polish Antitrust Probe Over App Tracking Transparency - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Faces Polish Antitrust Probe Over App Tracking Transparency

Poland's antitrust regulator is investigating whether Apple is restricting competition in the mobile ads market through its App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework, reports Reuters.

generic tracking prompt orange
Introduced in April 2021 with the release of iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5, Apple's ATT framework requires that all apps on ‌iPhone‌ and ‌iPad‌ ask for the user's consent before tracking their activity across other apps. Apps that wish to track a user based on their device's unique advertising identifier can only do so if the user allows it when prompted.

Apple said the feature was designed to protect users and not to advantage the company. It has been unsurprisingly unpopular with advertisers and data brokers.

Poland's anti-monopoly office, UOKiK, suspects that Apple's ATT framework could be favoring the company's own ads service by limiting the ability of third-party apps to collect user data for personalized ads.

"We suspect that the ATT policy may have misled users about the level of privacy protection while simultaneously increasing Apple’s competitive advantage over independent publishers," UOKiK President Tomasz Chrostny was quoted as saying in a statement. "Such practices may constitute an abuse of dominant position."

If the regulator finds its suspicions to be warranted, Apple could face a fine of up to 10% of its annual turnover in Poland.

In an emailed statement to Reuters, Apple said:

"It is no surprise that the data tracking industry continues to oppose our efforts to give users back control over their data, and now intense pressure could force us to withdraw this feature, to the detriment of European consumers."

"We will work with the Polish competition authority to ensure Apple can continue to offer users this valuable privacy tool."

Regulators in Germany, Italy, and Romania have opened similar probes to examine whether the privacy feature violates competition rules by impeding access to essential data for advertising while reinforcing Apple's own position in the digital ad market.

In March, Apple was fined €150 million ($162 million) by France's Competition Authority over the framework's implementation.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Thursday April 9, 2026 4:20 am PDT by
Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company. The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple...
apple india

Apple Withholds Data as India Antitrust Case Advances to Final Hearing

Monday April 20, 2026 4:55 am PDT by
Apple is facing a fast-track decision on regulatory penalties in India because it has not submitted data sought by the country's antitrust body as part of an investigation into its market practices. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) ⁠published a report in 2024 that Apple exploited its dominant position in the apps market by forcing developers to use its proprietary in-app purchase...
Apple TV Thumb 3

Here's What's Coming in the 2026 Apple TV

Thursday April 23, 2026 12:08 pm PDT by
There are a lot of folks waiting for a new version of the Apple TV because the set-top box hasn't been updated since 2022. There is an update coming this year, but people will need to wait a bit longer because Apple is holding the next Apple TV until the new version of Siri comes out this fall. Design Apple TV design updates don't happen often, and that's not changing in 2026. The next...

Top Rated Comments

cicalinarrot Avatar
22 weeks ago
I think most people don't even understand what's going on.
I want a disclaimer that clearly says "This App wants to sell your data to other companies and that's how you're paying to use it" when that's what's happening.
I want the choice to prevent it by default on all apps, without them even asking every time so that I could allow it by mistake.
I want the App Store to be very clear when that's happening. An app that sells my data is not "free". The button should say something as clear as "Free but they resell your data". Real freeware doesn't exist on phones and that's all Apple's fault (it's for money, not safety that they force everything through their store. We are safe on Macs and we have real freeware).
I want that for cookies on browsers too.
And I want who doesn't apply this to go to jail as scammers. But that's just my dream of accountability for companies that steal from customers.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
contacos Avatar
22 weeks ago
how about limiting it for everyone. Isnt this what GDPR is supposed to be for
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
wanha Avatar
22 weeks ago
the problem with these regulations is that the left hand doesn't know, understand, or care what the right hand is doing.

On one hand, you have legal rulings about consumer privacy and consumer rights.

On the other, there's ensuring fair competition, but... which sees privacy as a hinderance against competition.

Such siloed legal frameworks lead to conflicting, illogical, and ultimately harmful legal initiatives like is the case here.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
maszaikasza Avatar
22 weeks ago
Okay, I’ve read the original article on the UOKiK website, and it’s not such a big deal. It’s mainly about the terminology Apple uses
Here is a ChatGPT translation of that part of the article (so the exact texts in iOS in english can differ)

A consequence of this definition is the different messages displayed on the screens of iPhones and iPads. In the case of third-party apps, users see a prompt asking them to consent to “tracking” their activity—an action that carries a negative connotation. In contrast, for Apple’s own content the prompt concerns “personalized advertising.” Moreover, the message related to Apple differs graphically from the one shown for external entities. For example, the text on the accept/decline buttons is different. For Apple, the buttons read: “Enable personalized ads” and “Disable personalized ads,” while in the prompt for third-party apps, the order and wording of the buttons are: “Ask app not to track” and “Allow.”
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Happy_John Avatar
22 weeks ago

Every Tom, Dick and Harry of a European country isn’t satisfied with the (dumb) EU’s doings, they also have to add their own ill-advised and user hostile “probes”.
Way to go with insulting a whole load of nationalities in one sentence. Did you survey the roughly half a billion people in Europe to establish this "fact"?
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bollman Avatar
21 weeks ago
Well, if nothing else Apple has been extremely successful at making their users believe they are the second coming.
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)