Corellium Launching New Initiative to Hold Apple Accountable Over CSAM Detection Security and Privacy Claims - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Corellium Launching New Initiative to Hold Apple Accountable Over CSAM Detection Security and Privacy Claims

Security research firm Corellium this week announced it is launching a new initiative that will "support independent public research into the security and privacy of mobile applications," and one of the initiative's first projects will be Apple's recently announced CSAM detection plans.

appleprivacyad
Since its announcement earlier this month, Apple's plan to scan iPhone users' photo libraries for CSAM or child sexual abuse material has received considerable backlash and criticism. The majority of concerns revolve around how the technology used to detect CSAM could be used to scan for other types of photos in a user's library, possibly at the request of an oppressive government.

Apple will check for CSAM photos on a user's photo library by comparing the hashes of a user's pictures to a database of known CSAM images. The company has firmly pushed back against the idea that it will allow governments to add or remove images to that database, refuting the possibility that embodiments other than CSAM may get flagged if found in a user's iCloud Photo Library.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Apple's senior vice president of software engineering, Craig Federighi, said that the on-device nature of Apple's CSAM detection method, compared to others such as Google who complete the process in the cloud, allows security researchers to validate the company's claim that the database of CSAM images is not wrongly altered.

Security researchers are constantly able to introspect what's happening in Apple's software, so if any changes were made that were to expand the scope of this in some way—in a way that we had committed to not doing—there's verifiability, they can spot that that's happening.

Corellium's new initiative, called the "Corellium Open Security Initiative," aims to put Federighi's claim to the test. As part of the initiative, Corellium will award security researchers a $5,000 grant and free access to the Corellium platform for an entire year to allow for research.

Corellium believes that this new initiative will allow security researchers, hobbyists, and others to validate Apple's claims over its CSAM detection method. The security research firm, which just recently settled its long-lasting dispute with Apple, says it applauds Apple's "commitment to holding itself accountable by third-party researchers."

We hope that other mobile software vendors will follow Apple's example in promoting independent verification of security and privacy claims. To encourage this important research, for this initial pilot of our Security Initiative, we will be accepting proposals for research projects designed to validate any security and privacy claims for any mobile software vendor, whether in the operating system or third-party applications.

Security researchers and others interested in being part of the initiative have until October 15, 2021, to apply. More details can be found on Corellium's website.

Popular Stories

macworld iphone 18 pro colors

iPhone 18 Pro's Four Rumored Colors Revealed, Including 'Dark Cherry'

Friday April 17, 2026 3:50 am PDT by
A source said to be familiar with Apple's supply chain today revealed the color options Apple is planning for the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and the upcoming foldable iPhone. Image via Macworld. The information comes from Macworld, which says the signature new color for this year's Pro models will be Dark Cherry, a deep wine-like red. While other sources had previously reported on a...
ipad mini 7 feature red and blue

OLED iPad Mini: Release Date, Pricing, and What to Expect

Wednesday April 15, 2026 8:15 am PDT by
According to the latest rumors, Apple is close to launching its next-generation iPad mini. So what should we expect from the successor to the iPad mini 7 that Apple released over a year ago? Read on to find out. Processor and Performance Apple is working on a next-generation version of the iPad mini (codename J510/J511) that features the A19 Pro chip, according to information found in code...
macOS 27 on MacBook Pro

macOS 27 Will Mark the End of an Era

Saturday April 18, 2026 6:45 am PDT by
During its Platforms State of the Union segment at WWDC 2025, Apple revealed that macOS 26 Tahoe is the final major macOS version for Intel-based Macs. The upcoming macOS 27 release will be compatible with Apple silicon Macs only, meaning that you will need a Mac with an M-series chip or a MacBook Neo with an A18 Pro chip in order to install the software update. macOS 27 should be available...

Top Rated Comments

adib Avatar
61 months ago
For the first few months of iOS 15, I'm confident that the database just contains CSAM image fingerprints. However as time passes (and as Corellium's interest wanes), other authorities will push their agenda and force Apple's compliance to include "extra hashes" that are not part of CSAM....
Score: 31 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago
Sadly as expected, users will just roll over and accept it no matter what Apple is found doing. The Public have short memories. This does not make it any less wrong. It is still an appalling decision which should be rescinded.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago
The reason why Apple has been able to stave off warrant requests in the past is by claiming 'they don't have the key'

The current administration (as well as governments around the world) have been pushing for the ability to access your messages. CSAM gives Apple a chance to 'create' their own backdoor under noble pretenses (who is going to argue against stopping child abuse?) and creating an opening for the governments to eventually exploit. It won't matter what Corellium finds now.

And when it happens, Tim Cook will get up on stage and in his soothing southern drawl claim to be the good guy as they had the best of intentions. They won't even lose any customers over because most people are oblivious to privacy (Amazon has sold 100 million Alexa powered products), and the people that do care will have nowhere to go after the precedent is set and Google / Amazon / Microsoft have joined in.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago

So you don't think the below applies in this case?

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope

I guess we'll have to wait and see and hopefully Apple will be open with that they add to that hash list. If it can also be monitored by external initiatives such as Corellium I think that's good.
I think we have 20 years of increasing government intrusion to conclude that if A happens Z won't be far behind.

Liberty once lost is lost forever.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago
The fact that the analysis is done on device is even worse. That means that your privacy is invaded even with all network connection turned off.

EDIT: Let me elaborate for the down voters - if the photos are scanned only if uploaded to some cloud, you don't even have to cut your network connection. You just keep your photos on your device and you're safe. If the scanning is done on device that means that your privacy is not guaranteed no matter if you keep your photos offline or if you even cut your network connection.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago

Likely 18 U.S. Code § 2258 ('https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2258') - Failure to report child abuse and related laws:
* 18 U.S. Code § 2258A ('https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2258A') - Reporting requirements of providers
* 18 U.S. Code § 2258B ('https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2258B') - Limited liability for providers or domain name registrars
* 18 U.S. Code § 2258C ('https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2258C')
* 18 U.S. Code § 2258D ('https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2258D') - Limited liability for NCMEC
* 18 U.S. Code § 2258E ('https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2258E') - Definitions
None of those require on device scanning.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)