New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

FCC Expected to Repeal Net Neutrality Rules in Vote Next Month

FCC chairman Ajit Pai today announced that his controversial Restoring Internet Freedom order is headed to vote on December 14.


The order, proposed in May, would roll back the Barack Obama administration's classification of internet service providers as "common carriers" under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934.

As common carriers, internet providers are required to act as neutral gateways to the internet. In other words, companies like Comcast are not allowed to speed up or slow down content passing through their networks.

If the order passes, ISPs will be reclassified as "information service" providers, as they were between February 1996 and February 2015.
For almost twenty years, the Internet thrived under the light-touch regulatory approach established by President Clinton and a Republican Congress. This bipartisan framework led the private sector to invest $1.5 trillion building communications networks throughout the United States. And it gave us an Internet economy that became the envy of the world.
Apple and dozens of other large technology companies urged the FCC to reconsider its proposal. The FCC also received a record-breaking 22 million comments from the public during a feedback period that ended in August.

Those against the order believe that the FCC rolling back the internet's classification as a public utility will hurt net neutrality, as it could eventually divide internet users into so-called "fast lanes" and "slow lanes."

In a letter submitted to the FCC in August, Apple warned that paid fast lanes could result in an "internet with distorted competition."
Broadband providers should not create paid fast lanes on the internet. Lifting the current ban on paid prioritization arrangements could allow broadband providers to favor the transmission of one provider's content or services (or the broadband provider’s own online content or services) over other online content, fundamentally altering the internet as we know it today—to the detriment of consumers, competition, and innovation.
Pai, who was designated as FCC chairman by Donald Trump, insists the Obama-era internet regulations are a "mistake." Under the new rules, he said the FCC will "stop micromanaging the internet" to foster innovation.
Today, I have shared with my colleagues a draft order that would abandon this failed approach and return to the longstanding consensus that served consumers well for decades. Under my proposal, the federal government will stop micromanaging the Internet. Instead, the FCC would simply require Internet service providers to be transparent about their practices so that consumers can buy the service plan that's best for them and entrepreneurs and other small businesses can have the technical information they need to innovate.
Despite the significant backlash from tech companies and the public, it is widely expected that the FCC will vote in favor of the order next month.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.



Top Rated Comments

(View all)

12 months ago

We already have that. What is your point? I still feel like Net Neutrality was fixing something not really broken. It was always "this could happen" or "that might happen."


No we don't. We have service packages based on speed and, in some places, on data use, but not on actual content or specific websites (and even when there is a data cap, it is neutral in regard to what websites use the data). Now consider this carrier in Portugal, which does not have net neutrality regulations:



I do not ever want to see something like this in the U.S. In other words, what websites you can access depend on your plan, and they are grouped into packages like channels in a cable TV plan. In addition to implementing a scheme like this, a provider could theoretically slow down a competitor's streaming service and speed up their own. This is especially problematic in rural areas where they may only be one ISP to choose from.
Rating: 127 Votes
12 months ago

I'm a Trump supporter through and through, but this is ridiculous. I'm very much against this.


You get what you vote for.
Rating: 112 Votes
12 months ago
Trump with the reverse Midas touch...
Rating: 100 Votes
12 months ago

We already have that. What is your point? I still feel like Net Neutrality was fixing something not really broken. It was always "this could happen" or "that might happen."


Reddit $5/month
MacRumors $1/month
ABCTV.com $1/month
Netflix $5/month
FoxNews.com Free
NYT.com $10/month
Rating: 95 Votes
12 months ago
Terrible. Get ready for ISPs to offer "basic", "premium" and "deluxe" internet packages.

"Want to stream online video? Try out our "deluxe" package, which allows full-speed access to Netflix, Amazon Video, and several other popular streaming sites! Want to game online? You'll need the "ultra deluxe gaming package" to access the most popular MMORPG services!"
Rating: 94 Votes
12 months ago
Remember at the polls:

234 Republicans (and 6 Democrats) voted AGAINST net neutrality.

177 Democrats (and 2 Republicans) voted FOR net neutrality.

If you think "both sides are the same" you haven't been paying attention to any political issues.
[doublepost=1511287522][/doublepost]

I'm a Trump supporter through and through, but this is ridiculous. I'm very much against this.


He announced that he was against Net Neutrality back in 2014 (via Twitter no less). This shouldn't be a surprise.
Rating: 75 Votes
12 months ago
"Despite the significant backlash from tech companies and the public, it is widely expected that the FCC will vote in favor of the order next month. "

AKA:

The Republican Administration will ignore experts, people who work in the field, people making recommendations even against their best financial interests, AND the People themselves, to enact a 5th grader's misunderstanding of technology and economics.

This is Trump's America in a nutshell. Screw them smart liberals.
Rating: 62 Votes
12 months ago

We already have that. What is your point? I still feel like Net Neutrality was fixing something not really broken. It was always "this could happen" or "that might happen."

No we don't. We have different speed packages. Those speeds apply to EVERYTHING on the web.

I should have made my post more clear. Without net neutrality, a "basic" package could allow you to access "20 of the most popular websites" at full speed, while everything else would be throttled or unavailable. A "premium" package could allow you to access all or most of the web, and a "deluxe" package could be required to stream video or play games online. In other words, ISPs will have total control over the speeds you receive and the prices you pay for different parts of the web.
Rating: 54 Votes
12 months ago
The battle for net neutrality was lost in November 2016. Trump's election sealed its fate.
Rating: 45 Votes
12 months ago

Since when did has the government ever done something that makes sense, and moves to protect the rights of property owners instead of pandering to a popular majority? Weird...


Yeah it's a shame they forced those businesses to serve those pesky coloreds and Jews, right?

Don't pretend the government is inherently bad. Like anything, it's the use that counts. The breakup of AT&T and Standard Oil did great things for America.
Rating: 45 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]