Skip to Content

iOS 10 Beta Features Unencrypted Kernel Making it Easier to Discover Vulnerabilities

Apple's iOS 10 preview, seeded to developers last week, does not feature an encrypted kernel and thus gives users access to the inner workings of the operating system and potential security flaws, reports MIT Technology Review. It is not known if this was an unintentional mistake or done deliberately to encourage more bug reports.

ios10

Security experts say the famously secretive company may have adopted a bold new strategy intended to encourage more people to report bugs in its software--or perhaps made an embarrassing mistake.

In past versions of iOS, Apple has encrypted the kernel, aka the core of the operating system, which dictates how software uses the iPhone's hardware and keeps it secure. According to experts who spoke to the MIT Technology Review, leaving iOS unencrypted doesn't leave the security of iOS 10 compromised, but it makes it easier to find flaws in the operating system. Security flaws in iOS can be used to create jailbreaks or create malware.

The goodies exposed publicly for the first time include a security measure designed to protect the kernel from being modified, says security researcher Mathew Solnik. "Now that it is public, people will be able to study it [and] potentially find ways around it," he says.

Apple has declined to comment on whether the lack of encryption was intentional or a mistake, but security expert Jonathan Zdziarski believes it was done by choice because it's not a mistake Apple is likely to have made. "This would have been an incredibly glaring oversight, like forgetting to put doors on an elevator," he told MIT Technology Review.

He further suggests Apple may have chosen this route to prevent the hoarding of vulnerabilities like the one that was ultimately used by the FBI to break into the iPhone 5c of San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook and to have more people looking at the code to discover latent security flaws.

Related Forum: iOS 10

Popular Stories

imac video apple feature

Apple Unveils Two New Products

Monday March 2, 2026 7:49 am PST by
Apple today introduced two new devices, including the iPhone 17e and an updated iPad Air. iPhone 17e features the same overall design as the iPhone 16e, but it gains Apple's A19 chip, MagSafe for magnetic wireless charging and magnetic accessories, Apple's second-generation C1X modem for faster 5G, and a doubled 256GB of base storage. In the U.S., the iPhone 17e starts at $599, just like the ...
Apple iPhone 17e feature

Apple Announces iPhone 17e With A19 Chip, MagSafe, and More

Monday March 2, 2026 6:07 am PST by
Apple today announced the iPhone 17e, featuring the A19 chip, MagSafe connectivity, faster charging, and more. The iPhone 17e contains the A19 chip introduced in iPhone 17. It features a 6-core GPU and a 4-core GPU. Apple pointed out that this makes it up to 2x faster than the iPhone 11. The new 16-core Neural Engine is optimized for large generative models. The iPhone 17e also contains...
iPad Air M4 Chip 1

Apple Unveils iPad Air With M4 Chip, Increased RAM, Wi-Fi 7, and More

Monday March 2, 2026 6:05 am PST by
Apple today introduced a new iPad Air, with key upgrades including Apple's M4 chip for faster performance, an increased 12GB of RAM, Apple's N1 wireless networking chip with Wi-Fi 7 support, and Apple's custom C1X modem in cellular models. The new iPad Air has the same overall design as the previous-generation model, which is equipped with the M3 chip, 8GB of RAM, and Wi-Fi 6E support....

Top Rated Comments

127 months ago
A part of me believes that Apple wants at-least 1 jailbreak per iOS release. Where would they get ideas for future iOS versions from if it weren't for the jailbreak community?
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
127 months ago
If the next beta has it encrypted, it was a mistake. If it's open, it was on purpose.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
keysofanxiety Avatar
127 months ago
Something as big as this wouldn't have been a mistake or oversight.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
127 months ago
expert Jonathan Zdziarski believes it was done by choice because it's not a mistake Apple is likely to have made
I'm voting for a mistake.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
kgellci Avatar
127 months ago
What the last two posts said above. Someone just got fired. This is huge.

There are going to be emergency meetings for months, maybe years. I wouldn't be surprised if TC is ultimately canned over this by the board after all the chips fall.
Let's pretend this was an engineering mistake, why on earth would Time Cook get fired over it? I don't think Tim Cook even knows how the iOS build process works, let alone be responsible for a mistake in it.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
akfgpuppet Avatar
127 months ago
Hopefully this means a quicker jailbrake. (That at this point is sort of unnecessary)
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)