As Apple and other companies create products capable of providing more and more detailed health-related information, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has decided to give the companies creating these devices breathing room to manufacture the devices free, for the most part, from the scrutiny of the agency (via Bloomberg Business).

The FDA's associate director for digital health, Bakul Patel, noted that while the agency will be more lenient on devices aimed at simply improving the lifestyle of its customers, more health-invasive features, like a glucose monitor app on the Apple Watch, will continue to be reviewed by the FDA.

apple_watch_activity_blue

"We are taking a very light touch, an almost hands-off approach," Patel, the FDA's associate director for digital health, said in an interview. "If you have technology that's going to motivate a person to stay healthy, that's not something we want to be engaged in."

The rule of thumb released in a few guidelines by the agency highlight that the FDA's focus will be on devices and software that are attempting to replicate, or mimic, the functionality of a medical service or device. Basic heart-rate and step-counting aspects of these wrist-worn devices will receive little-to-no regulation from the FDA.

Marketing will also be a factor for the agency, according to Patel. If a company is attempting to promote a product as being able to assist doctors in making medical decisions, "it will require more oversight." This is a concern not aimed currently at Apple's own Apple Watch and HealthKit, due to both's minimally invasive health-related functionality, but could become a concern in the future as Tim Cook himself echoed hopes of both platforms helping to pinpoint diseases and cancers in the near future.

"We have to be confident in what we are getting," Patel said. "The trajectory is there and all signals are headed that way, but by the same token the research and science should get us that confidence. It boils down to will it work or not."

"The FDA has a role to play for providing patients and consumers a level of confidence that they can use it," he said.

With a focus "only on the higher end of technology", Patel notes that the agency asks itself what kind of harm a user may face if the product fails, and uses that answer as a springboard into regulation of the product as a whole. The new laid-back angle is in stark opposition of how the tech world views the FDA, with most startups listing regulation by the agency as one of the biggest risks to a business "even when scrutiny is unlikely." Patel, and the FDA, knows of the issue and plans to hire new staff in assisting to "improve relations with technology companies" in the future.

Although the FDA's new lax approach to basic fitness-tracking will give companies more room to operate on their own terms, as technology for the smart wearables category moves forward, we'll no doubt see more and more glucose- and blood pressure-tracking applications in the future. Apple itself has met with the FDA several times in the past few years, with most recent discussions centering around the functions and regulations of the Apple Watch.

Related Roundup: Apple Watch Series 9
Tag: FDA
Buyer's Guide: Apple Watch (Neutral)

Top Rated Comments

horsebattery Avatar
117 months ago
Why would the FDA get involved since its neither food or drugs?
Are you being obtuse on purpose?

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
maflynn Avatar
117 months ago
Why would the FDA get involved since its neither food or drugs?
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jayducharme Avatar
117 months ago
I'm generally pleased with Federal-anything taking a hands-off approach.

I'm all for the government looking out for consumers. Huge businesses are interested in profit first; that's the nature of capitalism. In that type of society, the government should be there to protect consumers from reckless or sloppy products that could cause harm. (And there have been plenty...)

Unfortunately, government has too often sided with big business in the past and citizen confidence has eroded. It's a matter of government organizations doing what they're supposed to do in a cost-effective manner.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
extricated Avatar
117 months ago
I'm generally pleased with Federal-anything taking a hands-off approach.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JosephAW Avatar
117 months ago
Apple needs to follow this hands off approach as well and not get involved with political and state rights and focus on making good products.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ThunderSkunk Avatar
117 months ago
Apple needs to follow this hands off approach as well and not get involved with political and state rights and focus on making good products.
Your want does not equal someone else's need.

Since Apple actually has holdings and employees in that state, it has a vested interest in that state being a stable part of the modern United States, observing whats left of the constitution, and not reverting to Bronze Age barbarian desert dweller culture as some kind of rogue nation state.

The FDA exists to endorse food & drug products and the sale thereof. Apple Watch is not a medical device and the FDA has no more grounds to approve or restrict it than they do your own finger, for its ability to check your pulse.


The day the FDA actually lifts a finger and quits blindly endorsing untested food technologies and the time honored tradition of pumping every single food product with a maximum amount of sugar & processing everything else until its nutritionally borderline poisonous garbage, & reviewing more than one out of ten thousand drugs for sale by the highest bidder while leaving everyone else to die horrible preventable deaths, their opinion might actually mean something other than just another thousand reasons to hate the government.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

iPhone 16 Camera Lozenge 2 Perspective Gray

Five Key Upgrades Coming to iPhone 16

Friday March 15, 2024 1:45 pm PDT by
The iPhone is Apple's top-selling product, and it gets an update every year. In 2024, we're expecting the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro lineup, with an arguably more interesting feature set than we got with the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Pro. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Capture Button All four iPhone 16 models are set to get a whole new button, which will be...
When To Expect New iPads Feature 1

Apple to Announce New iPads on March 26, Rumors Claim

Monday March 18, 2024 4:02 am PDT by
Apple is widely expected to release new iPad Air and OLED iPad Pro models in the next few weeks. According to new rumors coming out of Asia, the company will announce its new iPads on Tuesday, March 26. Chinese leaker Instant Digital on Weibo this morning 日发布%23">claimed that the date will see some sort of announcement from Apple related to new iPads, but stopped short of calling it an...
airpods 3 orange

Two New AirPods 4 Models Expected to Launch in September or October

Sunday March 17, 2024 7:56 am PDT by
Apple suppliers will begin production of two new fourth-generation AirPods models in May, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Based on this production timeframe, he expects the headphones to be released in September or October. Gurman expects both fourth-generation AirPods models to feature a new design with better fit, improved sound quality, and an updated charging case with a USB-C...
iphone se 4 modified flag edges

iPhone SE 4 Expected to Depreciate Heavily

Tuesday March 12, 2024 9:04 am PDT by
Resale value trends suggest the iPhone SE 4 may not hold its value as well as Apple's flagship models, according to SellCell. According to the report, Apple's iPhone SE models have historically depreciated much more rapidly than the company's more premium offerings. The third-generation iPhone SE, which launched in March 2022, experienced a significant drop in resale value, losing 42.6%...
General iOS 17 Feature Orange Purple

iOS 17.4.1 Update for iPhone is Imminent

Monday March 18, 2024 5:27 am PDT by
iOS 17.4.1 and iPadOS 17.4.1 should be released within the next few days, with a build number of 21E235, according to a source with a proven track record. MacRumors previously reported that Apple was internally testing iOS 17.4.1. As a minor update for the iPhone, it will likely address software bugs and/or security vulnerabilities. It is unclear if the update will include any other changes. ...
M3 iPad Feature 3

New iPads Likely to Begin Shipping in April

Monday March 18, 2024 9:52 am PDT by
Apple's new iPad Pro models with OLED displays will likely begin shipping to customers in April, according to information shared today by Ross Young, CEO of display industry research firm Display Supply Chain Consultants. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman also said the new iPad Pro models might not ship until "deeper" into April in his Power On newsletter on Sunday:I've repeatedly said that new...
iOS 17 Passkey With Apple ACCOUNT Feature

'Apple ID' Expected to Change to 'Apple Account' Starting With iOS 18

Sunday March 17, 2024 7:13 am PDT by
MacRumors was first to report that Apple was planning to rebrand "Apple ID" to "Apple Account" across its software platforms and websites like iCloud.com as early as this year, and now Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has corroborated this change. A mockup of the new Apple Account branding In his Power On newsletter today, Gurman said the new "Apple Account" branding will start to be used later this...