New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

Greenpeace Features Apple as 'Green Energy Innovator' in New Report

Environmental activist group Greenpeace, which has in the past taken Apple to task over environmental issues, has released a new report entitled "Clicking Clean: How Companies are Building the Green Internet" which classifies Apple along with Google and Facebook as "green energy innovators". The report praises Apple for its commitment to renewable energy, awarding the company three "A" grades and a "B" grade in the group's four rating categories.
Apple's aggressive pursuit of its commitment to power the iCloud with 100% renewable energy has given the company the inside track among the IT sector's leaders in building a green Internet. Apple has made good on its pledge by building the largest privately owned solar farms at its North Carolina data center, working with its utility in Nevada to power its upcoming data center there with solar and geothermal energy, and purchasing wind energy for its Oregon and California data centers. Apple's commitment to renewable energy has helped set a new bar for the industry, illustrating in very concrete terms that a 100% renewable internet is within its reach, and providing several models of intervention for other companies that want to build a sustainable Internet.
greenpeace_clicking_clean
The full report (PDF) highlights Apple's strong performance in transparency, its commitments to renewable energy and siting of facilities in areas with access to renewable energy, and its deployment of and advocacy for renewable energy. The only area where Greenpeace gives a slight downgrade to Apple is in energy efficiency and mitigation, where the group believes that Apple could do more to share details on its energy efficient facility designs to help the industry in general become more environmentally friendly.

Greenpeace was initially quite sour on Apple's renewable energy plans for its flagship North Carolina data center, believing the company to be relying mostly on coal-powered energy sources. Apple took issue with Greenpeace's claims, but the publicity seemed to have encouraged Apple to become more open about its commitments to renewable energy as it publicly stated its intentions to run all of its data center on 100% renewable energy. While Greenpeace continued to overestimate Apple's energy needs for the North Carolina facility for some time, the group appears to now be satisfied with Apple's disclosures and is on board with the company's energy policies.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

9 months ago
Greenpeace are hypocritical, corrupt to the top liars motivated by politics above anything else. Was it not Greenpeace that were protesting outside Apple's Irish HQ a couple of years ago?

That organisation disgusts me to my core.
Rating: 14 Votes
9 months ago
This is one thing I hope everyone copies from Apple ASAP. :)

PS - kudos to Google & Facebook too.
Rating: 12 Votes
9 months ago
This is perhaps off-topic, but I'm always irked by the use of cooling towers with "smoke" used to symbolize the "bad" side of energy. This is not smoke. They are cooling towers, and it's steam/water vapor that is seen coming out. Not smoke.

I worked at a design firm in Sydney a while back, and one of the clients was the NSW Energy Association (the exact name eludes me), and one of the biggest problems they had from a PR perspective was this very thing: people think it's smoke coming out of those big towers, which obviously looks bad. The real smoke is coming out of the super-tall chimney stacks, which is almost invisible these days.
Rating: 9 Votes
9 months ago
And what is so environmentally-unfriendly about Zynga? Their apps being trash doesn't count.
Rating: 5 Votes
9 months ago
I don't believe in or trust Greenpeace. Their history of actions has speak more than enough for me not to listen to them.
Rating: 5 Votes
9 months ago
Then they should be outraged over the amount of energy required for Bitcoin to exist. The "mining" operations that increase the complexity of the Bitcoin security are consuming hundreds of megawatts of power 24/7 around the world.

However Greenpeace probably doesn't want to be outraged about Bitcoin because they most likely use this currency to anonymously fund their less desirable, terrorist like activities.
Rating: 4 Votes
9 months ago


I never knew Aperture Science was so green. ;)
Rating: 3 Votes
9 months ago
hey greenpeace, my mbp is running on diced dolphin!
Rating: 3 Votes
9 months ago

There's a lot of hate against Greenpeace on this forum. So I would just like to quote from this article regarding hate trolls. Online trolls are psychopaths and sadists, psychologists claim. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-trolls-are-psychopaths-and-sadists-psychologists-claim-9134396.html (http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-trolls-are-psychopaths-and-sadists-psychologists-claim-9134396.html)


An example of a cleverly disguised ad hominem attack.
Basically you are claiming here that everyone critical of Greenpeace is a "hate troll" and therefore a psychopath and sadist.
Nice try.
Rating: 3 Votes
9 months ago
Not taking away from Google, Apple or FB in their efforts... but greenpicOshit is a complete joke. The founder left because he knew he was full of ****. They are just a bunch of tree huggers that make money off of ***** like this "rating", they are most likely related to Al Gore. Then they take that money and buy cars, live in homes and piss away all the resources they claim to be so precious.

Bitter? no, just tired of hypocrites getting any worthy press coverage. The ignorance of people to follow them and my past 20 years in the lumber/building industry gives me a few decades of experience about what GP really is and does.

I give GreenPeace 4 out of 4 stars for the complete BS and hypocrisy awards. Print that for news.
Rating: 3 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]