Got a tip for us? Share it...

New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

U.S. Carriers and FCC Come to Agreement Over Consumer Unlocking of Mobile Devices

CTIAThe five major U.S. carriers have come to an agreement with the FCC over a set of voluntary industry principles to make it easier for wireless customers to unlock their devices and switch from carrier to carrier if they wish. The CTIA -- the industry trade group representing AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, U.S. Cellular and Verizon in the matter -- says it will recommend the principles be added to the group's "Consumer Code for Wireless Service" and the carriers will commit to implement them within 12 months.

The terms agreed to include [PDF]:
- Disclosure: Each carrier will post on its website its clear, concise, and readily accessible policy on postpaid and prepaid mobile wireless device unlocking.

- Postpaid Unlocking Policy: Carriers, upon request, will unlock mobile wireless devices or provide the necessary information to unlock their devices for their customers and former customers in good standing and individual owners of eligible devices after the fulfillment of the applicable postpaid service contract, device financing plan or payment of an applicable early termination fee.

- Prepaid Unlocking Policy: Carriers, upon request, will unlock prepaid mobile wireless devices no later than one year after initial activation, consistent with reasonable time, payment or usage requirements.

- Notice: Carriers that lock devices will clearly notify customers that their devices are eligible for unlocking at the time when their devices are eligible for unlocking or automatically unlock devices remotely when devices are eligible for unlocking, without additional fee. Carriers reserve the right to charge non-customers/non-former customers a reasonable fee for unlocking requests. Notice to prepaid customers may occur at point of sale, at the time of eligibility, or through a clear and concise statement of the policy on the carrier's website.

- Response Time: Within two business days after receiving a request, carriers will unlock eligible mobile wireless devices or initiate a request to the OEM to unlock the eligible device, or provide an explanation of why the device does not qualify for unlocking, or why the carrier reasonably needs additional time to process the request.

- Deployed Personnel Unlocking Policy: Carriers will unlock mobile wireless devices for deployed military personnel who are customers in good standing upon provision of deployment papers.

Carriers reserve the right to decline an unlock request if they have a reasonable basis to believe the request is fraudulent or the device is stolen.
iPhone Unlock
In a statement issued after the agreement was announced, the CTIA noted that "unlocking devices may not necessarily mean full interoperability since devices that work on one provider’s network may not be technologically compatible with another wireless provider’s network" and that unlocking a device may enable some functionality but not necessarily all.

Early this year, the Library of Congress ruled that it was illegal for certain mobile phone owners to unlock their phones unless specifically authorized by their carrier. This past September, the Obama administration filed a petition with the FCC, asking that carriers be required to unlock mobile devices. This voluntary agreement between the FCC and carriers would appear to forestall the need for legal action by either Congress or the FCC.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

8 months ago
I still will only buy unlocked from Apple. Do not buy from carriers.
Rating: 9 Votes
8 months ago
And how will this take 12 months to implement? Oh right, wring out the customers first.
Rating: 8 Votes
8 months ago
The entire concept of locking phones is comical. Customers should pay their bills because they owe the money, not because the carrier can hold them hostage. If bills aren't paid, multi-billion dollar cellular service corporations have the same avenues to collect past due amounts as any other company, they need not keep our phones hostage.
Rating: 5 Votes
8 months ago

I always hate "voluntary" agreements companies make because they can change if and when the companies want. Many people don't realize that safety recalls in the US are nearly always voluntary, even for things that are clearly a health risk (salmonella, etc.).

Government does actually serve a purpose, and protecting the safety and rights of consumers is certainly one thing that governments should be doing. So while this is a step in the right direction, companies should be forced to unlock devices that consumers have paid for, it shouldn't be just if the carriers decide they want to be nice enough to do it.


I hope you vote, because we need more people like you.
Rating: 4 Votes
8 months ago
I always hate "voluntary" agreements companies make because they can change if and when the companies want. Many people don't realize that safety recalls in the US are nearly always voluntary, even for things that are clearly a health risk (salmonella, etc.).

Government does actually serve a purpose, and protecting the safety and rights of consumers is certainly one thing that governments should be doing. So while this is a step in the right direction, companies should be forced to unlock devices that consumers have paid for, it shouldn't be just if the carriers decide they want to be nice enough to do it.
Rating: 3 Votes
8 months ago

The entire concept of locking phones is comical. Customers should pay their bills because they owe the money, not because the carrier can hold them hostage. If bills aren't paid, multi-billion dollar cellular service corporations have the same avenues to collect past due amounts as any other company, they need not keep our phones hostage.


I couldn't have said it better myself.

What we really need is companies like Apple and Samsung to simply make one model unlocked phone, instead of caving into the carriers and allowing them to be locked in the first place. This would certainly help with making it much easier to sell the phones and also with manufacturing. Imagine how nice it would be to not have to be asked "what carrier" when you go to buy an iPhone.
Rating: 3 Votes
8 months ago

The entire concept of locking phones is comical. Customers should pay their bills because they owe the money, not because the carrier can hold them hostage. If bills aren't paid, multi-billion dollar cellular service corporations have the same avenues to collect past due amounts as any other company, they need not keep our phones hostage.


Actually they should,,, in the first 24 months, because the consumer does not own the phone - yet. Just like a collection agency can get take your car if you don't make payments, carriers should have some protection (not necessarily unlocking) against consumers who pay one bill and go Rouge.

Now what I think should happen is that a process should immediately unlock the phone as soon as they contract is finished, or in case of T-Mo paid in full. You should not have the customer send a fax to request unlock of something they paid for.
Rating: 3 Votes
8 months ago
Well, one can only hope for BYOD lowering of monthly fees.
Rating: 3 Votes
8 months ago
Any carrier that locks phones or tablets should be REQUIRED to disclose that at the time the device is purchased.

Locking is OK if and ONLY if the locking is clear and unambiguous. I recently purchased a full-price T-Mobile iPhone 5s and the lock/unlock status was NOT clear. It was unlocked, as I had hoped, but that was not clear and unambiguous.
Rating: 2 Votes
8 months ago
This doesn't help those who leave the country. This policy is absolute garbage. If I buy something on my credit card I don't have to wait till it is paid off to use it fully.
Rating: 2 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]