Apple Threatens to Sue Proview for Defamation as Chinese Court Asks Distributors to Pull iPads
Xie Xianghui, a lawyer for Shenzhen Proview Technology, said the Intermediate People's Court in Huizhou, a city in southern China's Guangdong province, had ruled on Friday that distributors should stop selling iPads in China.
The ruling, which was also reported widely in China's state media, may not have a far-reaching effect. In its battle with Apple, Proview is utilizing lawsuits in several places and also requesting commercial authorities in 40 cities to block iPad sales.
Apple Inc. said in a statement Monday that its case is still pending in mainland China. The company has appealed to Guangdong's High Court against an earlier ruling in Proview's favor.
Meanwhile, IDG News reports that Apple sent a letter to Proview today threatening a lawsuit over defamation charges. Apple had previously won a case over the trademark rights in a Hong Kong court, and Apple's threats claim that Proview has issued false public statements regarding the dispute.
On Monday, Apple sent a letter to Chinese display vendor Proview, demanding its founder Yang Rongshan cease releasing what it said was false information to the media. Apple then warned it would sue for damages caused by "defamatory statements."
"It is inappropriate to release information contrary to the facts to the media, especially when such disclosures have the effect of wrongfully causing damage to Apple's reputation," said the letter, which was provided by a person familiar with the matter.
The Hong Kong court ruled last year that the various Proview subsidiaries colluded in an effort to extort millions of dollar out of Apple, a figure that has now risen to $1-2 billion as Proview has continued to press its case. Chinese courts have so far sided with Proview, however, with Apple continuing to appeal there using the Hong Kong ruling to demonstrate the strength of its case.
Update: Financial Times clarifies that the court ruling today specifically related to a single retailer, Sundan. While the impact of the decision is limited due to its effect on a single retailer in a single city and the fact that it can still be appealed by Sundan, it may provide Proview with leverage as it pursues other lawsuits against resellers to try to halt the flow of iPads and force a settlement from Apple.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)
http://allthingsd.com/20120216/take-a-look-at-some-of-apples-evidence-in-proview-ipad-dispute/
The Bank of China (China-govt-operated bank) is one of Proview's creditors. Extortion on a massive scale.
The people on that blog are real a-holes.
Apple tried to get out of this cheap with an anonymous shell company. Clever, but it has backfired on them.
So if you owned a trademark and were approached by a company knowing it had a $568,000,000,000 cap, you would be willing to give it up for a lousy $55,000? I THINK NOT! No large company in their right mind would ever let a trademark owner know who they really were. This isn't 'clever, it's SOP.
Also, Apple tried to get out of this cheap with an anonymous shell company. Clever, but it has backfired on them.
The shell company is used so trademark observers don't know Apple bought the trademark, i.e. guess Apple is coming out with a product called the iPad.
If not a simple database search would have revealed it all.
It's not just Apple who does this, pretty much standard procedure.
If I were Apple and other tech companies, I would start thinking about plants and fabs in countries that still have cheap labor, but have more consistant court systems.
Unfortunately, it's not just cheep labor. China has tens of thousands of engineers that Apple needs and uses to ensure manufacturing capability and capacity. The USA and other countries don't have this capability.
(Walk the MIT campus some day and note the percentage of American students. It's mostly oriental and Indian students. Our college prep is third rate compared to china and India, and it's getting worse)
This coming from a multimillion dollar company that sued a small German cafe for their logo? Ironic
http://tinyurl.com/3dkdk3n
Looks nothing like apples apple. Am I alone here?
It's not exactly . . . kosher.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orient
"Because of historical discrimination against Chinese and Japanese, in some parts of the United States, the term is considered derogatory; for example, Washington state prohibits use of the word "Oriental" in legislation and government documentation, preferring the word "Asian" instead."
Every word is considered derogatory eventually it seems and we are forced on to new ones. Strangely this doesn't seem to have any real effect on how racist people are.
Unfortunately, it's not just cheep labor. China has tens of thousands of engineers that Apple needs and uses to ensure manufacturing capability and capacity. The USA and other countries don't have this capability.
(Walk the MIT campus some day and note the percentage of American students. It's mostly oriental and Indian students. Our college prep is third rate compared to china and India, and it's getting worse)
Oriental? Really?
[ Read All Comments ]

Accessory maker Moshi has released a new ultra-thin plastic shell protective case for the 11" and 13" MacBook Air models. This type of plastic case tends to be especially popular among...
Blizzard Entertainment said this week that it sold more than 3.5 million copies of Diablo III on launch day, setting the record for fastest-selling PC game. The company also sold 1.2 million copies...
Hard drive maker Seagate has announced it will purchase data storage device maker LaCie for roughly $186 million.
The company plans to buy the controlling stake owned by Philippe Spruch,...
Intuit has upgraded the iOS app for its Mint personal finance tool with two new "most-requested" features that should keep users from ever having to go to the Mint.com website. Until now,...