Gatekeeper Already Present in OS X 10.7.3, Available for Developer Testing
Mac OS X users will soon have the option of turning on Gatekeeper, a new Mac OS X security feature. When a user does this, the system provides an additional measure of safety: it blocks that user from opening newly-downloaded applications that are not Developer ID–signed. In this scenario, the same user is easily able to launch downloaded applications that are Developer ID–signed.
By default, Gatekeeper is not enabled in Mac OS X v10.7.3. For testing purposes, you can turn it on by using the new Mac OS X system policy control command-line tool, spctl(8).
Warning for non-signed application download with Gatekeeper activated on OS X 10.7.3
Regular users obviously would have little use for activating Gatekeeper on their Lion systems at the present time, as developers have not yet had a chance to begin distributing updated versions of their applications integrating the new Developer-ID functionality. But its inclusion in OS X 10.7.3 is an interesting tidbit that will help developers test their applications with the new program and explains why the new Xcode 4.3 that supports Developer-ID requires OS X 10.7.3.
In another sign of Apple's desire to quickly implement Gatekeeper, Panic's Cabel Sasser notes that Apple contacted select developers last week to invite them to learn more about the feature.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)This is ridiculous. An obvious money grabbing attempt by making users (by default) go through their App Store to get their software and system updates.
It looks really difficult to turn gatekeeper off too :rolleyes:
Wait, how is this going to work with open-source stuff that you compile yourself?
You turn off Gate Keeper.
But, the software may not be safe. It may trash your hard disk and steal your girlfriend. :D
I like the idea. Apple is preparing for the Windows style virus that are slowing starting to arise.
Virus =/= malware
Wow! MacRumors sure bears its name today!
Me love it!
Aye, poor Eric is working overtime today!
They already said they will be free
So I guess I don't understand the furor about this then. The default setting will allow signed apps without issue, and basically everyone here acknowledges that inexperienced users are not going to mess with the default. The certs will be free, so anyone can get them. Other than a dev taking the time to get a cert, how will this impede anything?
This is ridiculous. An obvious money grabbing attempt by making users (by default) go through their App Store to get their software and system updates.
I don't get why you wouldn't buy your app from the app store if its there?
If you're distributing open source software to consumers, the majority of which don't even know System Preferences exists, how the **** do you expect them to know how to disable Gate Keeper?
Consumers don't use open-source software (excluding open-source projects that have native Mac versions)...
Then again, advanced users might not need Gatekeeper. I'd like an option to just have it quickly inform me that it is not signed but open it and not prompt me to allow or disallow it to open.
[ Read All Comments ]

Accessory maker Moshi has released a new ultra-thin plastic shell protective case for the 11" and 13" MacBook Air models. This type of plastic case tends to be especially popular among...
Blizzard Entertainment said this week that it sold more than 3.5 million copies of Diablo III on launch day, setting the record for fastest-selling PC game. The company also sold 1.2 million copies...
Hard drive maker Seagate has announced it will purchase data storage device maker LaCie for roughly $186 million.
The company plans to buy the controlling stake owned by Philippe Spruch,...
Intuit has upgraded the iOS app for its Mint personal finance tool with two new "most-requested" features that should keep users from ever having to go to the Mint.com website. Until now,...