Got a tip for us? Share it...

New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

LTE iPad Coming to Japan Next Summer, LTE iPhone by Fall?

Nikkei Business reports [Google translation] that Japanese carrier NTT DoCoMo has reached an agreement with Apple that will see an LTE-enabled version of the iPad launch next summer, with an LTE iPhone to follow in the fall. The agreement is said to have been hammered out in discussions that saw NTT DoCoMo senior executives travel to Cupertino earlier this month to meet with Apple CEO Tim Cook.

The two companies reportedly reached a basic agreement on bringing the next-generation iPad and iPhone to the carrier, with more specific negotiations now focusing on details such as guaranteed sales volumes. Earlier this month it was reported that Apple and NTT DoCoMo were in discussions about the iPhone but that DoCoMo was hesitant to agree to Apple's demands on unit volume and its refusal to allow the carrier to add its own applications to the device.

Apple has yet to add LTE technology, which will enable faster data speeds, to its mobile devices over battery life concerns and a simple lack of chips appropriate for Apple's needs. But with carriers such as Verizon reaching a significant buildout of LTE and other major carriers also in the early stages of rolling out the faster network technology to their customers, Apple may be looking to take advantage of forthcoming LTE chips from Qualcomm to begin supporting the technology in 2012.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

37 months ago
Did anyone really expect Apple not to release an LTE capable phone? Their MO is pretty consistent: adopt the latest and greatest when it doesn’t compromise the experience. Sometimes that means Apple products are well ahead of the curve (e.g. FireWire, Thunderbolt, USB) sometimes it means they’re behind the curve (e.g. 3G, GPS, LTE) but they rarely miss the sweet spot of being a first class performer when the average consumer is ready.
Rating: 8 Votes
37 months ago
LTE support would be a nice addition but, unfortunately, LTE is still very rare in Europe so it will be more of a feature for the Americans and Asians.

Oh, and I would be - well, not pissed, but - dissapointed with Apple if they release a new iPad in Q2 2012, and than to release a newer iPad in Q3 or Q4 of 2012.

---------
I also expect from Apple to announce a huge upgrade over the iPhone 4S for the sixth generation iPhone in 2012. Apple is starting to lag behind when you look at the specs.

I'd just love to see a Super AMOLED Plus display in the next generation iPhone. First I was against it, but the "Plus"-variant is actually quite good. Great viewing angle, great battery life, great colours and a huge contrast. Although unlikely, I really hope they are going to use Samsung's Super AMOLED Plus (2?) displays in 2012 for the next-generation iPhone.
Rating: 2 Votes
37 months ago
2 thoughts to this article;

LTE is great and all, but I don't totally get how stuck up people are on it. No matter what software tricks apple can do, 3G will probably always trump LTE battery wise. Until you can get an LTE phone to last all day whats the point when 3G does pretty darn good by itself?

I am talking more towards the att people here as Verizons network - while more extensive in more rural areas especially - isn't as fast as att, but do webpages generally load slow for all you guys/girls? I generally wait about one second for a mobile formatted web page to load, maybe 2 for a full version of some site. Id take that plus a couple/few hours longer on the battery? As for file downloads (like iTunes) I am unlikely to do that on LTE anyway, because by time I am forced to switch I am sure I will loose my grandfathered unlimited plan. I am not about to download a full album of songs and eat 150-200mb of a 2gb plan. ymmv of course.

On a completely different note, no one mentioned the other piece of the rumor regarding DoCoMo hung up on wanting to install their own cr@pware on the iPhone. That never flew on the mac (namely bc apple didn't have any third party companies involved with the mac), hasn't so far on the iPhone, and I hope never does. Telecoms can hardly manage their core business. Please stay out of the bloatware business. We see how well that worked on every single phone prior to the iPhone.

----------

4G LTE iPhone 5 on Verizon, June 2012.


I'm guessing more like October. Dollars to doughnuts thats the new upgrade cycle, Oct to Oct.
Rating: 2 Votes
37 months ago
I guess I was wrong; Fall is Apple's new release schedule after all. That kinda sucks.
Rating: 2 Votes
37 months ago
If the LTE chips are power efficient enough for Apple's standards, theyll use them. Otherwise it's pretty much no go (as history would indicate)

It seems as if these new Qualcomm chipsets are finally up to standard, however. LTE iDevices will be EPIC.
Rating: 1 Votes
37 months ago
Cannot wait to purchase my first iPad next year-hopefully within the next 6 months.

It will interesting to see if the next generation iPhone will be released during the summer or the fall; I guess there is plenty of time for speculation.
Rating: 1 Votes
37 months ago

AT&T is really not as bad as people on this site make it out to be.


Yes... they are actually. They've been #1 worst carrier for years now, their tech support is worse than third rate, they nickel and time everyone, they drop calls, have horrible 3G coverage, have a very unstable network, are trying to lie by putting a 4G symbol on their iPhone 4S in place of a 3G symbol. Need I go on?
Rating: 1 Votes
37 months ago

Did anyone really expect Apple not to release an LTE capable phone? Their MO is pretty consistent: adopt the latest and greatest when it doesn’t compromise the experience. Sometimes that means Apple products are well ahead of the curve (e.g. FireWire, Thunderbolt, USB) sometimes it means they’re behind the curve (e.g. 3G, GPS, LTE) but they rarely miss the sweet spot of being a first class performer when the average consumer is ready.


USB?:D

I liked your argument for everything except that.
Rating: 1 Votes
37 months ago

I feel the exact opposite, whenever I see someone with an S2 on the subway or on the street I react to how blue the display is, a friend of mine had his out so I could try and the display gave me a headache due to it's blue hue.
At other times I've seen S2-owners playing wordfeud, and the whole display is blue/greensih, unlike the more calibrated and natural colors of the iPhone 4/4S.

Well, you also have iPhones with blue/yellow displays and some people can't stand it either. I really believe that Super AMOLED Plus is a real advantage over the current LCD screen used in the iPhone 4S.

And not to forget, Samsung is expected to announce an improved Super AMOLED Plus display in January. That would give Apple enough time to use them in the next generation iPhone.

I would also rather see a 4.3 16:9 display: a 16:9 4.3" display would fit in the current iPhone 4S with smart engineering. I know 16:9 will fragment the apps, but all the big, popular apps will update quickly anyway and the rest of the apps could run with black bars (and since black levels are really deep at a Super AMOLED Plus display, that wouldn't matter too much).

I would be satisfied, however, with a 4" 3:2 screen (iPhone has a 3:2 screen).

This may sound arrogant, but I really believe it would benefit all iPhone users out there. Of course, it's not so pleasant for the developers but the mobile space is developing quickly... keep up, or get out. Again, sounds arrogant but that's just how it is, unfortunately.

I seriously believe that most of you would be very happy when Apple would announce a 16:9 4" or 4.3" screen with Super AMOLED Plus (2) technology. ;)

In the end, it's just my opinion and everyone has different wishes. :)
Rating: 0 Votes
37 months ago

You are right that I might be saying it wrong, and I agree with you that iOS is less demanding than Android so 'lesser hardware' is alright, but the display is also about the experience.

You use the display for everything, it's your acces to everything and I really believe that Apple is lagging behind when you look at the display. Not in pixel density, but in other ways: contrast (and black level), thickness, viewing angle, colours and energy usage. I really believe that the Samsung Galaxy S2 is superior.

I'd rather have Apple to only change the next generation iPhone's design and display (to Super AMOLED Plus (version two, by than?), than that they keep using the same display, but add an A6 processor, new design, 12 megapixel camera, better camera stabilization, LTE, etc.

Again, the display is where you 'view the world' through.


I feel the exact opposite, whenever I see someone with an S2 on the subway or on the street I react to how blue the display is, a friend of mine had his out so I could try and the display gave me a headache due to it's blue hue.
At other times I've seen S2-owners playing wordfeud, and the whole display is blue/greensih, unlike the more calibrated and natural colors of the iPhone 4/4S.
Rating: -1 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]