Apple Becoming More Serious About Corporate Acquisitions?
In particular, the report notes that Apple last year hired Goldman Sachs investment banker Adrian Perica to assist with such deals. The hiring of Perica, who is believed to be the first dedicated mergers & acquisitions specialist on Apple's staff, reportedly replaces a "super ad hoc" process in which Apple department heads were themselves responsible for building the case for an acquisition and negotiating the terms.
Jobs has long preferred for his company to develop technology in-house and avoid the risks that come with integrating other companies into Apple's unique, finely tuned culture. In the past, there was no organized M&A effort, say three former executives at the company. Instead, business chiefs were supposed to keep an eye out for deals and go to Jobs if they thought there was a beneficial one to be made. After getting Jobs' O.K., the champion of the idea would pull together a team to make an overture, negotiate terms, and work through the administrative details. "It was super ad hoc," says one of the former executives.
A turning point for Apple was reportedly Google's acquisition of mobile advertising firm AdMob. Apple had reportedly been in discussions to acquire AdMob itself when Google swooped in and made its deal. Stung by the loss of AdMob to Google, Apple apparently moved quickly in its bid to lock up streaming media firm Lala as Google and others began to get involved.According to the report, experts believe that Apple is unlikely to engage in any blockbuster acquisition deals, instead relying on the small deals that bring very specific technologies, intellectual property, and talent to the company and that the company has relied on in the past. The addition of Perica and the loss of AdMob to Google's grasp, however, suggest that Apple may be looking to become more aggressive in its pursuit of those companies that fit its needs.
Top Rated Comments
(View all)... and am I the only one who thinks the "i" in front of the product names is starting to get really, really lame? It's cool to keep the iPod, iPhone, iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iMac, iBook, iDVD but please..... no iSlate....
If I were in charge, Palm and Netflix would be next on the list.
Netflix would be very interesting, but not sure how they're streaming (and other) rights transfer to an acquirer.
If I were in charge, Palm and Netflix would be next on the list.
I would like to know what you think Palm brings to the table. As far as I can tell, Palm has no desirable technology, no mindshare, dwindling marketshare.As to Netflix, I think Apple can compete with Netflix by building up competitive services in-house.
And as an AAPL stockholder, I'm not keen on Apple acquiring what I see as two over-valued companies. The percentage of shares shorted of float is 31% for Netflix; the market thinks this stock's price is going down.
It's even worse for Palm. The short percentage is a whopping 62%. That's right: more investors think this stock's price is gonna tank than those who think it's going to increase. Palm's financials are ugly as hell (almost $400M of debt?). My guess is if Apple announced that it was going to purchase Palm, the shareholders would not approve the transaction. I certainly wouldn't.
I realize many people here (notably people who have joined within the last one or two years) are blown away by Apple's product announcements, but I am fairly bored as of late. Ok -- the slate is coming (or not). Regardless, I'd love to see Apple become extremely aggressive as it relates to acquisitions and start entering even more market segments.
... and am I the only one who thinks the "i" in front of the product names is starting to get really, really lame? It's cool to keep the iPod, iPhone, iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iMac, iBook, iDVD but please..... no iSlate....
You said it bro. It's been pretty lame since the iPhone.
Please.
Yeah, they need to buy someone who makes file transfers easier and MUCH faster. I doubt their new server farm will do much. It just seems like they are inefficient.
In my ideal world, they would also buy Nintendo. As to whether or not that makes business sense: hell if I know?!? I don't even know how much Nintendo costs. I just want all their games and tech melted with everything that makes Apple a great hardware / software designing company. Haha, iWii. Gross. But seriously, I think Apple could seriously clean up in the games space.
[ Read All Comments ]

Our sister-site TouchArcade notes that Chillingo's excellent physics puzzler Feed Me Oil is free today for both the iPhone and iPad. It's normally $0.99 for iPhone and $1.99 for iPad....
Several years ago, Comcast began instituting bandwidth caps of 250GB per month on its residential customers. In 2008, this was plenty for most customers, but with the advent of streaming video...
Reuters reports that China Mobile Chairman Xi Guohua has once again publicly stated that the world's largest mobile phone carrier is engaged in talks with Apple about offering the iPhone to its...
Apple has filed a motion to dismiss in a case filed by customers over alleged misleading advertising depicting the Siri technology in the iPhone 4S. The lawsuit, filed in March, alleges that...
The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ASCI) today released its latest rankings of customer satisfaction in the United States for mobile phones and a number of products and services, with the new...