Got a tip for us? Share it...

ARM Cortex A9 Performance Demo - Likely Chip to Power iSlate and Future iPhones

As CES kicks off, one technology we've been hoping to hear more about is the status of the ARM Cortex A9 processor. Apple's iPhone as well as many of its competitors including the just released Nexus One currently utilize ARM processors based on the Cortex A8 design. The Cortex A9 represents the next generation which supports multi-core designs. The Cortex A9 multi-core processors are expected to scale beyond 2 GHz while drawing less than 0.25 W of power per CPU.

ARM's designs have always been focused on the mobile space, so low power has always been a major focus. This high performance-to-power ratio is also carried through with the upcoming Cortex A9 designs and is said to fare very well compared to Intel's Atom processor.

ARM just posted this side-by-side performance video comparing a 1.6GHz Atom netbook vs. a Cortex A9 development board.


Browsing performance is roughly the same, though the Cortex A9 is revealed to be running at only 500MHz compared to the 1.6GHz of the Atom processor. While these are rather subjective benchmarks, it reminds us that the Cortex A9 is an attractive alternative to Intel's processors in the mobile space.

Apple is believed to be an ARM licensee and is leveraging the expertise of P.A. Semi to develop their own processors for upcoming devices including iPhone and Tablet projects. Apple has been said to be working on multi-core processors for their next generation iPhones and the Cortex A9 is the natural fit.

The Cortex A9 would be a particularly good fit for the rumored Apple Tablet, as such a device is seemingly positioning itself between a mobile phone and notebook. Such a device would likely be tasked with more processor intensive tasks and be priced against Atom powered netbooks.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

27 months ago
It still isn't x86 though.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago

It still isn't x86 though.


Does that really matter? I don't think anyone's expecting to run Mac/PC apps on their iSlate.

arn
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago

Does that really matter? I don't think anyone's expecting to run Mac/PC apps on their iSlate.

arn

I still run into a few people that are planning to install Windows on their iSlate. I do have to break it to them that it's more than like ARM and no good comes from me telling them.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago

Does that really matter? I don't think anyone's expecting to run Mac/PC apps on their iSlate.

arn

I'm afraid many were, at least at $1000 a pop.

"at that price it better run OSX..." lot's of comments like that in the various slate threads.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago
the Atom processor on the left looked significantly faster than the ARM...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago

Browsing performance is roughly the same


Are we watching the same video?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago
For me more speed is never a bad thing however for a device like the iPhone I would give up a little performance for better battery life.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago
To be honest I am hoping for some more processor power. Would be nice being able to ditch the normal notebook for lectures and solely rely on this wunderkind.

With that in mind I would be greatly enthused if it were to, at least, match the performance of the new Atom platform, while being able to last longer on a battery charge.

Yes I know, we cannot get everything we wish for but they have still to reveal any details about this tablet.

I suppose an ARM Cortex A9 at 2Ghz should be quite the competition for any Atom-equipped netbook.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago
I like the use of CRT monitors to show us about the technology of tomorrow (like using a b&w camera to tell us about HDTV).
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
27 months ago

Are we watching the same video?


Well yes, it is roughly the same! The Atom had over 1 ghz over the ARM plus a gfx accelerator. Its all fine looking at 2 screens next to each other, and yes a couple of the sites, like BBC news was slightly slower on the ARM, but if you were walking around with that processor in your pocket for web browsing, you wouldn't mind!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]