Got a tip for us? Share it...

iPhone on Verizon: 'A Decision That is Exclusively in Apple's Court'

Verizon reported its quarterly earnings before the markets opened for trading today, showing increased revenue and subscribers, but decreased profit as the company worked to complete integration of former wireless competitor Alltel amid uncertain economic conditions. As noted by Digital Daily Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg claimed in the company's earnings conference call that bringing the iPhone to Verizon is entirely Apple's call and that the carrier would be happy to have it on its network.

During a conference call to discuss Verizon's third quarter earnings, Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg said bringing the iPhone to Verizon is entirely Apple's call. "This is a decision that is exclusively in Apple's court," he said. "Obviously we would be interested if they thought it would make sense for them to have us as a partner. And so we will leave it with them on that score. . . We want to broaden the base of choice for customers, and hopefully along the way, Apple, as well as others, will decide to jump on the bandwagon."

Verizon has recently begun targeting both the iPhone and AT&T in recent advertising campaigns, leading to speculation that the carrier does not foresee an introduction of the iPhone on its network and is thus willing to burn bridges with Apple in the new ads.

Offering the iPhone on Verizon's current network would require hardware modifications, given the difference in technology standards used by Verizon compared to all other carriers Apple has partnered with to offer the iPhone. Seidenberg previously noted that the iPhone would be more likely to come to Verizon next year when the company begins rolling out its 4G LTE wireless network, which will utilize the same standards as AT&T and other global wireless companies. Verizon expects to roll out LTE to 25-30 markets by the end of 2010, with full deployment expected to take until 2013.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

30 months ago
After the great advertising campaign and now this.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
look at him trying to save face by grouping apple in with all the others that are welcome to join verizons "bandwagon". it's more like apples bandwagon. that shows no class.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

After the great advertising campaign and now this.


So true. Pretty idiotic IMO to do the ads like that and still be "obviously" interested in having the iPhone on their network... Sigh.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
I think the ad campaign is one of the best ideas, because either Apple will be forced to play ball with Verizon, or Apple will be forced to take the negative publicity, but either way Verizon is in control.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
I would love to see the iPhone on verizon.. If it happens cool but it's still a few years away. If it even happens at all... So it looks like the game plan in febuary is still good bye verizon and hello t-mobile and an unlocked iPhone because I refuse to go to AT&T... And if later on the iPhone comes to verizon then I will switch back
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

After the great advertising campaign and now this.


Boy I agree - though I would love to see the iPhone on Verizon, this smacks of trying to put as good a face on it as possible. I'm sure Verizon doesn't approach manufacturers to get the hottest phones onto their network - I'm sure Verizon would welcome the iPhone 'if only Apple asked.'

Sounds more like "I'm taking my ball and going home."
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
"A decision that is exclusively in apple's court" = we have stated our terms (that we may know already that they won't accept) and its their choice to accept. I don't think this really means anything- just a comment on who spoke last in the negotiations.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago

After the great advertising campaign and now this.


Well shall we go with something from apple pass.

Go look at when they were bashing intel chips left and right. hell they were doing massive bashing up until the day they announced they were going over to intel on there computers and then Apple turned around and bash PPC and IBM.

"A decision that is exclusively in apple's court" = we have stated our terms (that we may know already that they won't accept) and its their choice to accept. I don't think this really means anything- just a comment on who spoke last in the negotiations.


Could be Verizon is not going to bend over for apple and only offer them the term they offer all the other phone manufactures out there. At some point I see AT&T doing the same thing to apple because at some point all the other companies will get fed up with apple getting a $400 subsidization on the iPhone compared to the $250 give to the other smart phones.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
what ad campaign are you talking about? The "there's a map for that" is targeted at AT&T (though it obviously plays off the iphone) and the "idon't" turned out to be motorola's ad, right?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
30 months ago
Too bad he doesn't say "hey we're sorry we don't use the wireless solution the rest of the civilized world uses." "We're changing to a GSM family solution now and maybe then we can have iPhones" hahaha
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]