Got a tip for us? Share it...

Contract and Subsidy Issues for iPhone Users Looking to Upgrade to iPhone 3G S

With the announcement of the iPhone 3G S yesterday, many current iPhone users have been looking to upgrade to the new model. Unfortunately, many users have been surprised and disappointed to find that their carriers are requiring that existing iPhone customers under contract are unable to immediately upgrade at the $199/$299 price point offered to "qualifying" customers.

It appears that many of these users had expected to be "qualified" for the lowest pricing despite being currently locked into a multi-year contract, as carriers such as AT&T permitted original iPhone users to upgrade to the iPhone 3G at the qualified price despite still being under their original two-year contracts. The key difference between last year's situation and this year's is that the original iPhone was unsubsidized by AT&T, and thus the carrier had no upfront subsidy to recoup through the two-year contracts its customers were on.

Customers on iPhone 3G contracts, however, received initial subsidies of several hundred dollars, meaning that carriers will require those customers to fulfill most or all of their contracts prior to qualifying for full subsidized pricing on upgraded models. This policy is not unique to AT&T, as upfront carrier subsidies quickly became the basis of Apple's iPhone business model throughout the world. As TechRadar notes, UK carrier O2 has also been receiving complaints from customers unable to qualify for fully subsidized pricing.

Speaking to Steve Alder, General Manager of Devices for O2 UK, he pointed out that it simply wasn't viable to let O2's iPhone customers upgrade early:

"Having subsidised much (or all - depending on tariff) of the price of a customer's iPhone 3G, we simply cannot justify invalidating that contract and subsidise a second device for the same customer.

"Much as we understand the desire of many customers to have the latest version, this would be a loss making deal for O2 and would be a distinct set of business terms for iPhone customers that don't apply to our other customers."

Confusion remains, however, over just what requirements are necessary in order for existing customers to qualify for subsidized pricing for a given carrier. Carriers typically permit users to qualify for partial or full subsidized pricing on handset upgrades several months prior to the expiration of their existing contracts in exchange for the customer locking in for an additional multi-year contract.

But AT&T iPhone 3G customers, for example, appear to be receiving varying information about when they will be eligible for subsidized pricing on the iPhone 3G S. One MacRumors forum member reports that an AT&T representative claims that this discrepancy stems from whether the customer purchased an original iPhone prior to purchasing an iPhone 3G, in which case the customer would qualify for subsidized pricing on the iPhone 3G S only 12 months after signing their iPhone 3G contract instead of the 18 months required for customers who had only purchased an iPhone 3G. A number of other forum members, however, claim that the pricing offers they are receiving do not reflect this supposed set of rules.

Because it remains unclear exactly how much of their contracts iPhone 3G users will need to fulfill before becoming eligible for subsidized pricing on the iPhone 3G S, customers looking to upgrade should anticipate additional clarification on this process from their carriers.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

35 months ago
That's how it works everywhere and AT&T should not be an exception.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
i really dont understand why this is such an issue. With any other subsidized phone...if a newer model came out....you wouldnt just go to att and say...oh i have the old version of that...i would like the new one...please give it to me at that subsidized rate....

why are people all of a sudden shocked at this practice?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
I went into an AT&T store this morning and asked the salesman what my upgrade options were for the 3GS. He told me that I could only get the unsubsidized prices for the 3GS if I wanted to get it on launch day. He also told me that I can only get the early upgrade pricing($399/$499) on or after July 11 (1 year after my purchase of the 3G).

He was looking at my account on his computer as he was telling me this.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
I got an iPhone 3G on launch day in the UK and signed an 18 month contract at £45 a month and got the phone for free as it was subsidised.

12 months later, I don't expect an upgrade or treatment different to other o2 customers. I do expect an upgrade in December.

An 18 month contract is an 18 month contract - get used to it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
People love to blame others for their failures. In this case, not thinking ahead. This is SOP in the industry, love it or hate it. AT&T deserves no more ire than every other carrier. Apple deserve none of it.

If you stand on the tracks, don’t complain when the train hits you.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
Although i don't live in the US i feel it is almost time for a petition against ATT... all they seem to do is restrict the iPhone. I know this article isn't just about ATT but it is yet another thing on top of the delayed MMS and tethering... Come on Apple you can do better! Has anyone else had the feeling that ATT has been restricting possible iPhone features for the rest of us?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
Welcome to the world of subsidized cellular contracts. This is nothing new.

-Kevin
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
seems like a mess. hopefully i can find a loophole though
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
Has anyone heard of exceptions? I'm talking about early upgrade from a NOKIA-my son has NEVER had an iPhone. You'd think they'd want the higher monthly income...

A few months ago I went to the ATT store because my sim card died. I have an original iPhone, not a 3G. The guy at the ATT store it turned out used to work at an Apple Store so seemed to have much more experience than the typical ATT sales person. Anyway he saw that ATT had not remove a monthly text charge from before I had an iPhone so I was immediately credit about $150. COOL! But if I hadn't gone in.......??? OUCH!

Anyway I'm ready to upgrade to a 3GS for 199. but I also want to get my son his first iPhone. Online it shows he won't qualify until next April for the subsidized rate (from a Nokia).

Has anyone heard that if you go in the store and buy two they ever make an exception? It would seem since he never had an iPhone they would want the larger monthly bill. Im not talking about upgrading from a 3G or any other iPhone

Exceptions ever?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
35 months ago
I don't know what's the big deal anyways. If you really want the "3GS" so bad, just sell the "3G" and you won't have to put so much of a difference for the new one. I sold mine for 300, and i'm just gonna need 150 (including taxes/fees) and that's it.

No big deal.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]