Got a tip for us? Share it...

Judge Dismisses Psystar's Anti-Trust Counterclaim Against Apple

A California judge has dismissed a counterclaim from Psystar which asserted that Apple was violating federal and state anti-trust laws in limiting the sale and use of Mac OS X on Apple branded computers..

But in a 19-page order passed down on Tuesday, Judge William Alsup largely reject Psystar's claims and granted Apple's motion to have the countersuit thrown out of court should the clone maker not better its argument through an amended complaint that can be filed no later than Monday December 8th.

AppleInsider notes that Psystar attempted to define a "Mac OS market" in which Apple held a monopoly. Apple, of course, successfully disputed this definition of a "market" with which the judge agreed.

"Apple asks its customers to purchase Mac OS knowing that it is to be used only with Apple computers," he wrote. "It is certainly entitled to do so."

Psystar is a small company which sells a Mac clone using off-the-shelf PC parts and a modified version of Mac OS X Leopard. Apple sued Psystar over these products and that case is still pending.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

42 months ago
Oh wow, a judge who understands intellectual property laws and technology!!! Fantastic!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago
That was very predictable. And welcome.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago
i can't actually believe that they thought their shaky ground would last. be interesting to see what they come up with by next month.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago
So what does this mean... can someone exlpain?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago
Definitely good news. Psystar, nice try, but it's only a matter of time for you now... :cool:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago
Oh good. A new Psystar thread. :D

I'm not surprised by this decision; I wonder if they can or will appeal against this part of the case.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago
Apple needs the competition I think, since anyone using an Apple knows how terrible Windows is. Apple charges ridiculous prices, and they know it. It won't be long until all of this backfires on them and Microsoft becomes the underdog.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago
Makes perfectly good sense. The statement "it is certainly entitled to do so" will irritate many naysayers around here, but is absolutely correct.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago

So what does this mean... can someone exlpain?


PsyStar counter-sued Apple for restricting OS X to their own computers. Now that this particular case has been dismissed, Apple can, in fact, allow to keep their Macintosh operating system to their own products.

This does not, however, count for Apple's claim against Psystar for infringing on their rights and using the Macintosh OS on Psystar products, which is still going on.


(If there are inaccuracies in my summary, please point them out)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
42 months ago

Apple needs the competition I think, since anyone using an Apple knows how terrible Windows is. Apple charges ridiculous prices, and they know it. It won't be long until all of this backfires on them and Microsoft becomes the underdog.


There's two sides to every transaction, and every single "ridiculous" price that Apple charges is countered by a customer on the other side of the transaction who saw value in conducting the transaction at that price.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]