Got a tip for us? Share it...

Royalty Rate Unchanged, Apple's iTunes Safe For Now

Apple generated some headlines on Tuesday when statements by iTunes vice president Eddie Cue suggested that Apple might shut down iTunes rather than pay increased royalty rates to music publishers.

Few took the threat seriously, but CNet reports that the Copyright Royalty Board decided to keep royalty rates at 9.1 cents. Music publishers had been pushing for an increase to 15 cents per track, while Apple was insisting that the price increase would not be tolerated by the market.

The 9.1 cents/track rate is now set for the next five years. An Apple spokesperson stated they were very pleased with the decision.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

44 months ago
There is big news in that article - the rates for downloadable songs and CDs may have remained unchanged, but a rate of _24 cents_ has been established for ringtones. :eek:


The three-member board that sets statutory copyright licenses e-mailed the Digital Media Association (DiMA), the National Music Publishers' Association, Apple, and other download stores with its decision to keep the royalty rate at 9.1 cents a song. The board also set the same rate for CDs and established a 24-cent rate for ringtones.

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago

An Apple spokesperson said stated they were very pleased with the decision.

heh, I bet they were.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago
yay the music store stays.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago

There is big news in that article - the rates for downloadable songs and CDs may have remained unchanged, but a rate of _24 cents_ has been established for ringtones. :eek:


I don't get it? What is so special about a ringtone? 'Hey, let's buy a 20 second snippet of a song for about 5x the price of the whole song itself'.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago

I don't get it? What is so special about a ringtone? 'Hey, let's buy a 20 second snippet of a song for about 5x the price of the whole song itself'.


That's what's so special. The fact that it's just a snippet. There's very little additional work for the middlemen, so they're entitled to a smaller cut (even though it's still too big), leaving more for the composer.

Remarkably sensible decision.

*edit* Oh, and the Music Store was never in threat. That statement was Apple's way of saying that they would ensure that any royalty increases would be paid out of the record companies' profits, rather than the music-buying public's pocket.

Seen in that light, leaving the download-able rate untouched seems like rather a poor decision.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago
Wait, so if a song is $0.99, 90 cents goes to Apple? If not - what exactly is this royalty about?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago

Wait, so if a song is $0.99, 90 cents goes to Apple? If not - what exactly is this royalty about?


No, I think apple keeps around 30%. The rest, of which this royalty is a part, goes to the record labels. They then pay this royalty. The problem Apple saw (as I understand it) was that they would be expected to up that 70% to cover the extra royalty but what they really wanted was for the record label to pay the extra out of the 70% they already get.

So, actually, it's the record labels being greedy.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago
No surprises there,

When you ask for a salary increase and your boss tells you is either u keep working for the same money or the street it is for you, and basically there's not many options that offer what u already have u will definitely just shut up and keep working.

In a way good that iTunes have the power to make things stay the way they are I really can't care less how they divide the money people pay por the tracks.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago
the 30% royalty to Apple is only for the App Store. For music they get a lot
less than that, iTunes is there to persuade people to buy iPods not so much fill their pockets.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
44 months ago

I don't get it? What is so special about a ringtone? 'Hey, let's buy a 20 second snippet of a song for about 5x the price of the whole song itself'.


Clearly writing a snippet of a song is much harder than writing a complete song.

Seriously, who is still paying high prices for ringtones, when most phones will just let you use files that you already have?

Sensible decision though, perhaps if they'd asked for a bit less than a 66% hike, they might have got an increase.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]