Got a tip for us? Share it...

Cisco and Apple "iPhone" Negotiations Extended

Cisco issued a brief statement yesterday indicating that Apple and Cisco's negotiations over the iPhone trademark are ongoing and that an extension has been provided until February 21st 2007.

Cisco appears to be capitalizing on the ongoing press coverage over the "iPhone" trademark and in February had taken out a full page ad in the New York Times promoting its own iPhone.

Cisco is hard at work increasing their brand recognition according to a Timesonline.co.uk article:

"People know about Cisco, perhaps because of the stock, but most people do not know what Cisco does," [CEO's chief development officer] said. The group is intent on changing that.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

65 months ago
I hope this gets resolved either way by this date as it serves no one to drag it on for so long.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
Just settle it with an arm-wrestling match;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
Rock, paper, scissors...? :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
Cisco who?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
The fact the noise is seen as benefiting Cisco, whch I do believe it does, means

1. Improved name recognition.
2. Oh they make phones too?
3. They have a trademark Apple wants? Apple is usually strong.

A couple of points. This goes to show once again any news, good or bad, is good news if your whole goal is to shake-up your stodgy image (routers for 90% of the internet or something).

Secondly. The trademark ussue is now in Apple's favor. It always was really, it just has to be litigated if Cisco does not simply conform to legal reality.

Thirdly, despite the fact Cisco got "some" trademark, it was for a different type of device than the Apple product, was not used as required by law and was lost, and Apple can simply embarrass Cisco on command to a lawyer.

So one wonders if this "courting of Cisco" is somehow related to Apple looking to buy them out? :)

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15837290?q=csco

Rocketman
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
In the end nothing good will come of this story, not for the consumer, not for Apple, not for Cisco, not for Cingular. And it's getting old.

Sad part is that it's not even remotely close to being discreet. Any person with more than 2 brain cells can clearly see this is patent sitting, a publicly ugly attempt at extortion of sorts, and the basis for trying to create 'interoperability' is greed at its worst. Not the ideal basis for creating product or feature or service and I hope the consumer doesn't have to see the outcome of it come purchase time.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
I hope their stock goes up enough for me to sell my stock and get my money back. Than I can buy apple stock.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
Cisco? I thought they sold food shortening.

Oh, wait...
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago
I'll say it again lol, iMOBILE. iPhone is a cheesy moniker, iMobile would cover all the bases of what Apple's iPhone product can/will do AND it would stick it to Cisco for apparently attempting to cash in on the iPhone moniker. How can I email Jobs about this? lol :cool:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
65 months ago



So one wonders if this "courting of Cisco" is somehow related to Apple looking to buy them out? :)


Given that Cisco's market cap is more than twice Apple's, why would you think that?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]