Got a tip for us? Share it...

Apple Stock Options Fallout Continues

With Apple's annual SEC statement due Friday and the pending restatement of historical financial statements, Law.com reports that Apple may be under increased scrutiny by the SEC due to apparently deliberately falsified documents by company officials to maximize the profitability of option grants to executives.

In June, Apple began an internal probe of stock option grant "irregularities", the results of which saw the departure of former CFO Fred Anderson from Apple's board amid findings of "serious concern" regarding two former officers. Law.com labels Anderson and former general counsel Nancy Heinen as those former officers.

Over 100 companies including Microsoft, CNet Networks, and Computer Associates are in similar situations, and the falsification of documents appears to be a key element under scrutiny in SEC investigations which may lead to criminal charges.

"When there are falsified documents, the government views them as an intent to defraud, because people generally don't falsify documents unless they're trying to make things different from reality," said Keith Krakaur, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in New York working on backdating cases. [...]

Krakaur and other defense lawyers -- including several in San Francisco who asked to remain anonymous for fear of affecting local probes -- said government lawyers are focusing on falsified records as a means of proving that executives knew their actions were wrong. "They view that as intent," he said. (Ed Note: Krakaur is not personally involved in the Apple case)


Current officers including CEO Steve Jobs were largely cleared from involvement by the independent investigation. Still, it appears as though Jobs has sought independent counsel beyond Apple's lawyers in dealing with the matter.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

67 months ago
from cnn
http://money.cnn.com/2006/12/27/technology/apple_options/index.htm?postversion=2006122710


Web site says federal investigation could leave company open to criminal prosecution; shares lose 4.5% in early trading.
December 27 2006: 10:05 AM EST


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Federal prosecutors are reportedly investigating stock option administration documents at Apple Computer that were apparently falsified by company officials, according to a published report.

The Recorder, an online publication of legal news Web site Law.com, reported the allegation of the false documents, citing unidentified people with knowledge of Apple's situation.
The report also says that Steve Jobs, the CEO and co-founder of Apple, has apparently hired his own legal representation, separate from Apple's lawyers, to deal with investigators from the Securities and Exchange Commission and Justice Department. The company has previously said that Jobs was not implicated by its own internal probe of the options scandal.

Shares of Apple (Charts) sank 4.5 percent in morning trade on Nasdaq.

The article does not reveal which documents were allegedly falsified. But Apple had previously disclosed that "stock option grants made on 15 dates between 1997 and 2002 appear to have grant dates that precede the approval of those grants." By changing the date of an options grant, an executive who receives the grant can obtain even greater savings when buying the stock in the future.

The article said that falsification of documents puts Apple at risk for potential criminal prosecution. Federal investigators are looking into allegations about illegal backdating of options at 100-plus companies, and some of them will likely be pursued solely as civil SEC inquiries, while others may face criminal charges.

"When there are falsified documents, the government views them as an intent to defraud, because people generally don't falsify documents unless they're trying to make things different from reality," Keith Krakaur, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, told the Recorder.

Krakaur told the Web site he was speaking generally and not about Apple, with which he's not involved. But Krakaur was formerly the attorney for Kobi Alexander, the former CEO of Comverse Technology (Charts), who was indicted by Brooklyn federal prosecutors on charges of backdating option grants and has been living as a fugitive in Namibia for the past several months.
Sleazy CEO's options tricks

Brocade Communications Systems (Charts), McAfee (Charts), UnitedHealth Group (Charts) and K.B. Home (Charts) are other companies that have seen their CEO leave under the cloud of options backdating scandals.

Apple has confirmed the probe into its stock option program in June and said it conducted its own internal investigation, which it completed in October and turned over to federal investigators.

It said in a statement in October that an internal investigation of its options program "found no misconduct by any member of Apple's current management team" although it conceded that the probe "raised serious concerns regarding the actions of two former officers in connection with the accounting, recording and reporting of stock option grants."

As to Jobs' involvement, the statement said its CEO "was aware that favorable grant dates had been selected, but he did not receive or otherwise benefit from these grants and was unaware of the accounting implications."

The Recorder's article identified the ex-officers cited but not identified by Apple as a former general counsel, Nancy Heinen, and a former chief financial officer, Fred Anderson.

Anderson retired as CFO in June 2004, but remained on the board until October this year. His resignation from the board was revealed at the same time the conclusion of the internal probe was announced. The company said at that time that he had "informed the company that he believes it is in Apple's best interests that he resign from the board at this time."

Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago
So how bad is this for Apple?
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago
So many companies do this sort of thing all the time....

Is it really a crime anymore? :p
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago

So how bad is this for Apple?


shares lose 4.5% in early trading

.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago

Steve Jobs, the CEO and co-founder of Apple, has apparently hired his own legal representation


You don't spend the cash for a team of reps unless you need the protection. :(
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago
As more info comes out and my stock continues to tumble, I have one thought for those responsible or aware of the accounting practices: :mad:
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago
This one continues to rumble doesn't it? Thing to remember nbs2, is that Wall Street typically over-reacts to everything. So if the stock is tumbling 4% today, it will gain some if not all of that loss back tomorrow. The only things that will push it down permanently are 1) if Friday's refiling results in Apple having made enormous accounting errors and being fined by the SEC to the tune of a ten-digit amount, or 2) Steve Jobs resigns.

Personally in your position I'd wait it out. AAPL is valued on future-performance more than anything. Unless 2) above happens, I'd say the stock will rebound quickly enough in early 2007.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago

So how bad is this for Apple?


This is very, very, bad. This is a crime, and there are severe penalties Apple may incur. They are learning a very harsh lesson here, their secrecy can not keep the Feds from finding inaccuracies.

Although I doubt this will hurt Mac or iPod sales since the products are amazing no matter how many documents have been falsified, the person above me was correct, you hire your own legal representation because you need it, and there is no time to mess around.

I wish I could say due to my love for the executive team that I proclaim their innocence, but I can not as the Feds seem to know more than I do.

Good luck to whatever side is telling the truth.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago

You don't spend the cash for a team of reps unless you need the protection. :(


Or think you might, which isn't exactly the same thing.

The original law.com article:

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1167127308611

I don't think anyone really knows what any of this means. The article implies only that the two Apple execs who have already resigned might be facing criminal charges. The markets are speculating that Jobs might be implicated somehow, but so far nothing anyone has actually said points in that direction.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
67 months ago
Stuff like this makes me feel so stupid.

Someone please help:

What the hell is going on? What exactly was done? What kind of documents were falsified?

I know it says they aren't sure which documents, but I mean, what TYPE of documents? I don't understand the situation.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]