Skip to Content

iPhone 16e Long-Term Review: What to Know Before the iPhone 17e Launches

As we approach the launch of the iPhone 17e, MacRumors videographer Dan Barbera decided to take a look back at the iPhone 16e. He goes over what it's been like using Apple's budget ‌iPhone‌ over the past 12 months, and whether it's worth choosing over one of Apple's more expensive models.


The ‌iPhone‌ 16e is $599, so it's $200 cheaper than the iPhone 17. ‌iPhone‌ 16e buyers didn't miss much in terms of performance or battery life compared to those who bought Apple's more expensive iPhones, but the device does only have a single camera, which is one of the main downsides.

There's a single-lens 48-megapixel Wide Angle lens, so no Telephoto and no Ultra Wide lens, which also means no macro support. The other major feature that's missing is MagSafe, which is majorly inconvenient since ‌MagSafe‌ charging is so prevalent. There's no Camera Control button, but that's easy to do without.

Apple used an older design for the ‌iPhone‌ 16e, so it still has a tired-looking notch instead of the Dynamic Island, and it only comes in black or white so there are no fun colors to choose from. Other than the camera, design, and ‌MagSafe‌ shortcomings, the ‌iPhone‌ 16e is remarkably similar to Apple's other iPhones and you're not going to notice much in the way of day-to-day differences between the ‌iPhone‌ 16e and a higher-end model.

We definitely don't recommend buying an ‌iPhone‌ 16e right now, but the ‌iPhone 17e‌ that's going to launch very soon will absolutely be worth considering over Apple's more expensive flagship iPhones.

Rumors suggest the ‌iPhone 17e‌ is going to solve some of the problems that we had with the ‌iPhone‌ 16e. It could get a ‌Dynamic Island‌ for the first time, adding all of the ‌Dynamic Island‌ features like Live Activities, and it's supposedly going to be updated with ‌MagSafe‌. We're also expecting Apple's upgraded C1X modem and the same A19 chip that's in the ‌iPhone 17‌.

As long as you don't mind the lack of extra cameras, the ‌iPhone 17e‌, like the ‌iPhone‌ 16e, is going to be a very competitive ‌iPhone‌ that gives you a lot of performance for the money. If you've been waiting to upgrade from an older device, the ‌iPhone 17e‌ has the potential to be a very good buy.

Related Roundup: iPhone 17e
Buyer's Guide: iPhone 17e (Buy Now)
Related Forum: iPhone

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...

Top Rated Comments

2 weeks ago
We are not all alike. Some of us like having less. Crazy, right? I love my iPhone Air, but if it didn’t exist my next choice would be an E.
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
2 weeks ago
The people hating on the 16e are the geeks on this thread that have PRO models. The target market as pointed out on the 16e page are iPhone 12 and SE owners.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
tubular Avatar
2 weeks ago
I’ve got a 16e and I’m perfectly happy with it. But I’m also not a phone-based lifeform.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
2 weeks ago

MKBHD did the best video on this. This phone is for absolutely no one who is actually shopping for a phone. It's for people who don't care or have no choice what phone they get either because they'll take whatever comes free with the plan or whatever their work bought in bulk.

And that was when it was brand new and being compared to the 16 series. Now that the base 17 exists there's no reason for the 16e to exist.
It's $200 cheaper. That's reason enough.

..and when a company, like mine, buys 300 of these, it adds up.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
2 weeks ago

MKBHD did the best video on this. This phone is for absolutely no one who is actually shopping for a phone. It's for people who don't care or have no choice what phone they get either because they'll take whatever comes free with the plan or whatever their work bought in bulk.
If I didn’t have the mini, I would be in the market for an “e”, because I value having no/minimal camera bump and a small and lightweight phone, and have always been fine with single-camera iPhones. I like its clean design best among the current lineup. It’s only a bit expensive for its feature set.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
2 weeks ago
Notch > dynamic island
Score: 7 Votes (Like | Disagree)