Apple, Google Commit to Fairer App Store Practices in UK - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple, Google Commit to Fairer App Store Practices in UK

Apple and Google have agreed to a series of changes aimed at making their app stores fairer for developers, the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced today.

app store blue banner uk fixed
The concrete commitments come after the CMA found the two companies had a duopoly and designated them as having "strategic market status" in mobile platforms last October. The designation is not a finding of wrongdoing, but gives UK regulators new powers to demand specific changes to boost competition in the mobile market.

Under the agreed terms published by the CMA, both companies will ensure apps are reviewed and ranked on their app stores in a "fair, objective and transparent way," without discrimination against apps that compete with their own services. They also commit to safeguarding developer data collected during the app review process.

There are also requirements of Apple around the issue of interoperability. Apple must allow developers to more easily request access to iOS features and functionality, which could clear the way for third-party apps to better compete with Apple's own services.

"The commitments announced today allow Apple to continue advancing important privacy and security innovations for users and great opportunities for developers," Apple said in a statement given to Bloomberg.

The changes are set to take effect on April 1, pending a public consultation period that runs through March 3.

The CMA says it will closely monitor implementation and won't hesitate to impose formal requirements if the companies fail to follow through. Further measures are expected in the coming months that could include potential changes to how Apple's digital Wallet app operates.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Popular Stories

iOS 26

iOS 26.4 Adds Two New Features to CarPlay

Tuesday March 24, 2026 1:55 pm PDT by
iOS 26.4 was released today, and it includes a couple of new features for CarPlay: an Ambient Music widget and support for voice-based chatbot apps. To update your iPhone 11 or newer to iOS 26.4, open the Settings app and tap on General → Software Update. CarPlay will automatically offer the new features so long as the iPhone connected to your vehicle is running iOS 26.4 or later....
AirPods Pro Firmware Feature

Apple Releases New Firmware for AirPods Pro 3, AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4

Tuesday March 24, 2026 12:31 pm PDT by
Apple today released new firmware for the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Pro 3, and the AirPods 4. The firmware has a version number of 8B39, up from 8B34 on the AirPods Pro 3, 8B28 on the AirPods Pro 2, and 8B21 on the AirPods 4. There is no word on what's included in the firmware, but Apple has a support document with limited notes. Most updates are limited to bug fixes and performance...
apple tv 4k new orange

tvOS 26.4 Adds These New Features to Your Apple TV

Wednesday March 25, 2026 3:33 pm PDT by
Apple this week released tvOS 26.4, and the software update includes a handful of new features and changes for the Apple TV. tvOS 26.4 is compatible with all Apple TV 4K and Apple TV HD models released since 2015. To update your Apple TV, open the Settings app on the device, navigate to System → Software Updates, and select Update Software. Below, we have recapped what is new in tvOS...

Top Rated Comments

surferfb Avatar
7 weeks ago
Sounds like the UK got Apple to agree to do what it’s already doing. 🤣

But in all seriousness, I see no issues with this - seems reasonable and doesn’t require third party stores.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 weeks ago
Too bad those of us in the good old USA are 2nd class now. It seems like the only way for U.S. customers to get fairness out of Apple is though the government. Good to know.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
7 weeks ago
a big nothingburger it seems. apple and google were happy to sign off on this one and get the regulators off their back.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
ThomasJL Avatar
6 weeks ago

Apple and Google have agreed to a series of changes aimed at making their app stores fairer for developers,
Anyone who believes that Apple, Google, and other Silicon Valley corporations care about making things “fairer” is extremely naïve. Silicon Valley corporations would support slave labor if it were both legal and led to large profits.

And many people, such as Tim Cook supporters, would try to justify Cook using slave labor by saying that he has a “fiduciary duty” to shareholders to maximize profits.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
6 weeks ago

I may have misunderstood the last sentence in your comment. If “users who prefer one … model” were granted their wish, would that not exclude third-party app stores forever? User A wants just one store, user B wants more than one. There is no way to accommodate both. Again, I may have misread your point.
Happy to clarify!

In my opinion, given the fact that Android offers users the ability to install apps from alternate app stores (or no App Store at all), users who care strongly about being able to install apps from anywhere have an option: Buy an Android device. In other words, your User A should buy an iPhone, User B should buy an Android.

The issue is that (in my opinion) a subset of developers want access to Apple’s customers, who when compared to Android users, are significantly more likely to spend money on apps. But the subset of developers don’t want to follow Apple’s rules for various reasons (generally: they’d make more money if they didn’t have to), despite the fact that Apple’s rules are (again in my opinion) a huge part of the reason Apple users spend money on apps.

There is also a vocal minority of iPhone users, who are disproportionately represented on MacRumors (given it’s a technically proficient audience who are generally capable of safely analyzing and installing software from “unauthorized” sources in a way people like my dad, my mother-in-law and my kid are not) want to have an iPhone, but also want third party stores.

So rather than make trade offs, these developers and power users want to have government bureaucrats dictate that they get to have their cake (iPhone) and eat it too (sideloading/third party stores) and those who like things the way they are are just out of luck. And for the non-technical users who are now more susceptible to scams snd malware? Well too bad, they should learn how to use computers better.

But (in my opinion), given the significant privacy and security advantages that Apple’s model provides, having some bureaucrats take it away from everyone in the name of “competition” actually does more harm than good, and ironically reduces competition in the market.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
surferfb Avatar
7 weeks ago

Apple is not doing any of these things. And third party stores are inevitable in the UK and elsewhere.
Disagree. I think it's pretty clear that apps on the App Store are already ranked and reviewed in a "fair, objective and transparent way."

Third party stores may be inevitable, but they shouldn't be. Users who prefer the "one App Store model" ought have an option for one - it's safer and more secure for the vast majority of consumers.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)