OpenAI Launches Smarter, More Conversational ChatGPT 5.1 - MacRumors
Skip to Content

OpenAI Launches Smarter, More Conversational ChatGPT 5.1

OpenAI today upgraded GPT-5 to GPT-5.1, the next-generation version of the AI model that powers ChatGPT. There are two versions of GPT-5.1, including Instant and Thinking.

chatgpt logo
Instant is warmer, more intelligent, and better at following instructions, according to OpenAI, while GPT-5.1 Thinking is easier to understand, faster on simple tasks, and more persistent on complex tasks.

OpenAI says that users can expect a more enjoyable communication experience, with options to more easily customize ChatGPT's tone. There are new presets for tone, including Professional, Candid, and Quirky. The new presets join the existing Default, Nerdy, Cynical, Friendly (previously Listener), and Efficient (previously Robot) options. ChatGPT can also proactively offer to update preferences during conversations when you ask for a certain tone or style, and there are fine tuning options to adjust how concise, warm, or scannable responses are, along with how often it employs emojis.

By default, GPT-5.1 Instant is warmer and more playful, and more likely to adhere to parameters that you set. GPT-5.1 Thinking is able to adapt thinking time more precisely to the question, and responses are clearer with fewer undefined terms. It's also warmer and more empathetic than before.

Questions will continue to be routed to the most suitable model using GPT-5.1 Auto. GPT 5.1 Instant and Thinking are rolling out to users today, with paid Pro, Plus, Go, and Business users set to get access first, then free and logged-out users. Enterprise and Edu users will get a seven-day early-access toggle, after which GPT-5.1 will become the default model.

OpenAI plans to roll out GPT-5.1 gradually to keep performance stable, so not all users will see it right away.

GPT-5 will remain available in the legacy models dropdown for paid subscribers for the next three months.

Popular Stories

openai logo blue

OpenAI Introduces GPT-Live to Make ChatGPT Voice Feel Like a Real Conversation

Wednesday July 8, 2026 12:03 pm PDT by
OpenAI today introduced GPT-Live, which it describes as a new generation of voice models meant to make talking to AI feel more like having a conversation with a real person. GPT-Live is meant to replace the existing ChatGPT voice experience. GPT-Live is able to listen and speak at the same time, and it can show it is paying attention with acknowledgment phrases like "mhmm." The model was...
openai chatgpt work

OpenAI Debuts ChatGPT Work Agent and New GPT-5.6 Models

Thursday July 9, 2026 11:01 am PDT by
OpenAI today announced ChatGPT Work, a ChatGPT agent with built-in Codex that can complete tasks across web, mobile, and desktop using information from your apps. ChatGPT Work can execute multi-step tasks, using scheduling to work independently. Like Claude Cowork, ChatGPT can use your computer to do tasks in the background across apps. Tasks can be started and managed on any device,...
chatgpt atlas browser

OpenAI's ChatGPT Atlas Browser Is Shutting Down

Friday July 10, 2026 4:54 am PDT by
OpenAI says it is shuttering its ChatGPT Atlas browser. When it was released last October, the company said the agentic browser was designed around the question "What if you could chat with your web browser?" The query was at least novel, but the answer was apparently not all that compelling. As part of a slew of ChatGPT Work-related announcements on Thursday, OpenAI confirmed plans to...

Top Rated Comments

turbineseaplane Avatar
9 months ago
Awful company with zero moral or ethical values.

I will avoid them at all costs.
Score: 14 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CocktailHour Avatar
9 months ago
Just waiting for the AI Bubble to burst wide open.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago
AI is a huge mistake.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjsuk Avatar
9 months ago

There is a bubble in some instances, mainly large LLM companies but the technology is bigger than the internet itself. We've deployed internal LLM's and processes at our company and we are starting to see productivity gains start to accelerate. Ultimately people won't get replaced by AI (maybe robots doing manufacturing or warfare drones) but people who don't use AI will get replaced by those that do and can. Our company is going to monitor use and make employment decisions based on productivity and use.
Some thinking points for your faith argument from an analytical perspective (this is my job):

1. Your company will be in trouble when the LLM token pricing goes through the roof.
2. Your company will be in trouble when the LLM company changes the model and your prompts do not function correctly.
3. Your company will be in trouble when the LLM company goes down the toilet and the other LLM company gets an influx of traffic they can't handle with their hardware provision. This also incurs point 1 and 2 as a damage multiplier.
4. It's a tangible business risk building on technology which has absolutely no working revenue model. It may disappear tomorrow.
5. You do not have the cash, hardware or resources to train your own model and make a ROI on it and run it yourself even on a cloud platform.
6. You are likely to reach regulatory and legal problems when it comes to making employment decisions based on automation of this class (chain of proof).
7. Robots and manufacturing have near zero use for LLMs. There is some specific AI use cases in inspection. That is it. Having humanoid robots working in a factory setting is science fiction. Production is required to be 100% deterministic and LLMs are not.
8. You can't replace people with AI. But you can replace people with AI spending and watch your stock prices rise while burying the lay off.

This whole thing is faith without empiricism.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
OliOliOliOli Avatar
9 months ago


Attachment Image
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago

Awful company with zero moral or ethical values.

I will avoid them at all costs.
Have you discovered Grok and its owner yet?
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)