Apple Cinemas Won't Back Down in Trademark Battle with Apple - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Apple Cinemas Won't Back Down in Trademark Battle with Apple

Apple Cinemas, the company that is being sued for alleged trademark infringement by Apple, today said that it is committed to defending its brand.

Apple Cinemas

We are committed to defending our brand, our history, and our continued right to operate as Apple Cinemas--an identity that is and has always been clearly distinct and fully compliant with all applicable trademark laws.

Apple Cinemas is a long-established independent theater chain with no connection to Apple Inc. Our name reflects our geographic roots and has never been intended to suggest, or used to imply, any affiliation with their brand. Furthermore, claims of consumer confusion are unfounded. Apple Cinema's branding is clearly differentiated.

We have responded reasonably and transparently to all legal communications regarding this matter and remain focused on growing our business and brand in good faith, as we have for over a decade.

Apple filed a lawsuit against Apple Cinemas last Friday. Apple's attorneys accused Apple Cinemas of "knowingly and intentionally using the name Apple to sow confusion for its own benefit."

Apple Cinemas has operated since 2013, and the company claims that its name came from its first planned location at Apple Valley Mall in Rhode Island, but a movie theater never opened at that mall. Apple Cinemas operates 14 total locations, according to its website. One of those is in San Francisco, California, while the others are in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and New York.

Apple believes that Apple Cinemas is pursuing a nationwide expansion in the United States, including close to Apple's headquarters and retail stores.

In the lawsuit, Apple said that its "repeated efforts to resolve the matter amicably" were unsuccessful. Apple also cited comments from people who were under the impression that Apple Cinemas is owned by Apple. Apple has produced movies and TV shows distributed through its Apple TV+ service since 2019.

Apple Cinemas tried and failed to trademark both the Apple Cinemas name and the "Apple Cinemas Experience," with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denying the marks in 2024 because of potential confusion with Apple's prior trademark rights.

Apple is seeking monetary damages and an injunction to stop Apple Cinemas from using the name.

Popular Stories

iPhone Handoff Feature

iOS 27 Introduces New 'iPhone Handoff' Feature

Wednesday September 2, 2026 12:35 pm PDT by
Apple has added a new "iPhone Handoff" feature to iOS 27 that will allow you to switch between two iPhones while using the same phone number on each device. This functionality was briefly mentioned during the WWDC 2026 keynote in June, on a slide that listed hundreds of new features coming in iOS 27 and corresponding software updates, but Apple never shared any further details at the time. ...
Dynamic Island iPhone 18 Pro Feature

iPhone 18 Pro Prices Estimated Ahead of Apple Event Next Week

Thursday September 3, 2026 3:41 am PDT by
Less than a week before Apple debuts new iPhone 18 Pro models, research firm TrendForce has estimated the prices of the devices based on the latest hardware cost environment. TrendForce's price estimates compared to last year's models look like this: Model Starting Price Model Starting Price Change iPhone 17 Pro $1,099 iPhone 18 Pro $...
Apple Foldable Thumb

iPhone Ultra's Very High Price and Features Revealed in New Report

Thursday September 3, 2026 7:33 am PDT by
Ahead of Apple's event on Wednesday, September 9, where it is expected to unveil its first-ever foldable iPhone, Taiwanese research firm TrendForce today outlined the device's estimated price range, features, and some other key details. In the U.S., TrendForce estimated that the foldable iPhone will have a starting price of $2,099 to $2,299 and said the highest-end configurations could...

Top Rated Comments

jarman92 Avatar
14 months ago

Seems heavy-handed. Does anyone really think this "Apple Cinemas" will create brand confusion? Seems like it could have been settled. Give them some money to rebrand
Yes this will absolutely cause confusion, particularly with Apple's recent push into movies (which is what I imagine prompted this suit). It's the same name and both use an apple logo. Trademark law doesn't care what nerds like us think, it cares what the average consumer thinks. And it's readily apparent that the average consumer would look at the Apple Cinemas logo and think it's associated with Apple (Inc.).

This is a dumb position for them to take and they're absolutely going to lose.
Score: 29 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Johnny907 Avatar
14 months ago
Good. It’s a movie theater, Tim. No one is confused here.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
junior Avatar
14 months ago

Yes this will absolutely cause confusion, particularly with Apple's recent push into movies (which is what I imagine prompted this suit). It's the same name and both use an apple logo. Trademark law doesn't care what nerds like us think, it cares what the average consumer thinks. And it's readily apparent that the average consumer would look at the Apple Cinemas logo and think it's associated with Apple (Inc.).

This is a dumb position for them to take and they're absolutely going to lose.
But that's the argument that doesn't put Apple Inc in a position of strength. Their push into the movie scene is quite recent. Certainly way after 2013 when Apple Cinemas began.
Remember Apple Inc paid Apple Corp $500m to buy up rights so they could run a music-related business.
Score: 24 Votes (Like | Disagree)
klasma Avatar
14 months ago
I wonder if Samsung and Meta will sue them as well if they show Galaxy Quest.
Score: 23 Votes (Like | Disagree)
It’s always something Avatar
14 months ago
I would be more sympathetic if Apple Cinemas existed before Apple Computers.
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Hajj.david Avatar
14 months ago
Guys, by law if you don’t vigorously defend a trademark you lose it. Apple learned their lesson from “App Store” they didn’t protect their trademark and lost it so anyone can call their store ‘App Store’. Hate the law not the lawyers following it.

- Business owner who has had to deal with trademarks and fighting for it before.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)