Skip to Content

Apple Sued for 'All-Seeing Eye' Employee Device Monitoring Policy

California Apple employee Amar Bhakta has filed a lawsuit against Apple for alleged labor violations, accusing the Cupertino company of suppressing employee speech, invading employee privacy though surveillance and inspecting personal data, and clawing back earned wages (via Semafor).

Apple Park View
Bhakta sued Apple after Apple prohibited him from speaking about his work experience on podcasts and also instructed him to remove information about his "working conditions and work experiences" from his LinkedIn profile. He says that Apple's policies prevent employees from adequately describing their job responsibilities, accomplishments, and professional growth on sites like LinkedIn, hindering their ability to find employment.

Further, Bhakta claims that Apple employees are prohibited from disclosing the skills, knowledge, and experience they gained at Apple when working for a subsequent employer, plus they are not allowed to speak with each other or outsiders about problems at work like harassment, discrimination, or unfair treatment.

Apple employees are required to use Apple devices, software, and services, and the devices "collect and use the valuable personal data" of employees during non-work periods. The lawsuit states that employees have to agree to physical, video, and electronic surveillance by Apple, with Apple able to search Apple and non-Apple devices and other property when an employee is on "company premises," including in a home office. The Apple ecosystem is described as a "prison yard" for employees, with workers subject to "Apple's all-seeing eye" both on and off duty.

The lawsuit takes issue with Apple's requirement that employees use Apple collaboration tools with an iCloud account, often a personal ‌iCloud‌ account. Bhakta says Apple allowed him to choose to use an Apple-owned iPhone or a personal iPhone for work, and when he chose his personal phone, Apple installed an eSIM and VPN, and required him to use his personal ‌iCloud‌ account to collaborate with colleagues. He claims that Apple has forced him to remain an Apple consumer, and that he is required to continue to patronize Apple.

Bhakta was hired at Apple in July 2020 as a Digital Ad Tech/Operations Manager, and he was required to sign documents listing the Apple policies that are cited in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit seeks damages for violations of the California Labor Code as well as "appropriate injunctive relief" to protect California Apple employees from future violations.

Popular Stories

iOS 27 Mock Quick

iOS 27 Will Reportedly Be Like Mac OS X Snow Leopard

Sunday March 15, 2026 9:42 am PDT by
In his Power On newsletter today, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reiterated that iOS 27 will be similar to 2009's Mac OS X Snow Leopard, in the sense that one of Apple's biggest priorities is bug fixes for improved performance and stability. During WWDC 2008's State of the Union, Apple showed a slide that said Mac OS X Snow Leopard had "0 new features," as it opted to focus on performance and...
AirPods Max 2 Feature

Apple Announces AirPods Max 2 With H2 Chip and More

Monday March 16, 2026 6:12 am PDT by
Apple today unveiled AirPods Max 2, with key upgrades including the H2 chip, increased active noise cancellation, improved sound quality, and features such as Adaptive Audio, Conversation Awareness, Voice Isolation, and Live Translation. The new AirPods Max have the same overall design as the previous generation, with most of the new features coming from the upgrade to the H2 chip:- Adaptive ...
Apple Logo Sketch Feature

Apple Unveiled a Surprise New Product Today

Monday March 16, 2026 10:50 am PDT by
Surprise! Apple today unveiled the AirPods Max 2, despite no rumors suggesting that a new version of Apple's over-ear headphones were imminent. Key upgrades compared to the previous AirPods Max include Apple's H2 chip, increased active noise cancellation, improved sound quality, and features such as Adaptive Audio, Conversation Awareness, Voice Isolation, and Live Translation. AirPods Max ...

Top Rated Comments

RSmith2023 Avatar
17 months ago
I see several statements in there when he says "Apple allowed me to choose between an Apple owned device or a personal device for work" and he chose to use his personal device. I guess he thought that they shouldn't monitor his work related communications on his personal device? Easy fix - use the company device for work and your personal device for personal communications.

Just seems like this guy was looking for a way to file a claim and sue.
Score: 63 Votes (Like | Disagree)
17 months ago
maybe choose a company-owned device next time, instead of wasting judicial resources?
Score: 53 Votes (Like | Disagree)
kalsta Avatar
17 months ago

Loyalty comes with a price. Not willing to pay the price? Don't sign the dotted lines.
Sorry, but principles like loyalty and confidentiality always need to be balanced with the needs and human rights of the people. If you’re not free to ‘speak … about problems at work like harassment, discrimination, or unfair treatment’, then the balance of power is pretty skewed.
Score: 44 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DocMultimedia Avatar
17 months ago
Should have read the employment contract.
Score: 44 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cicalinarrot Avatar
17 months ago
ironic /ī-rŏn′ĭk/

[HEADING=2]adjective[/HEADING]
[LIST=1]
* Characterized by or constituting irony.
* Given to the use of irony.
* Poignantly contrary to what was expected or intended.



Attachment Image
Score: 39 Votes (Like | Disagree)
gleepskip Avatar
17 months ago
I don't like the appearance of some of these policies, but no one forced him to sign them or work for Apple.
Score: 35 Votes (Like | Disagree)