Skip to Content

Audacity 'Spyware' Claims Follow Privacy Policy Changes By New Owner

audacityPopular open-source audio editing software Audacity is facing "spyware" allegations from users for recent privacy policy changes that suggest the desktop app is collecting user data and sharing it with third parties, including state regulators where applicable.

Two months ago, Audacity was acquired by Muse Group, which owns other audio-related projects including the Ultimate Guitar website and the MuseScore app. According to Fosspost, changes to the privacy policy section on the Audacity website indicate that several personal data collection mechanisms have since been added by the parent company.

The type of data collected now includes the computer's processor, operating system and version, the user's IP address, and any crash reports, fatal error codes and messages generated by their machine. More concerning perhaps is the inclusion of a vague section listing data that must be collected "for legal enforcement, litigation, and authorities' requests (if any)."

The storage of said data is located in servers in the U.S., Russia, and the European Economic Area. For example, IP addresses are stored in an identifiable way for a day before being hashed and then stored in servers for a year, leaving users identifiable via government data requests.

In addition, the new policy prevents people under the age of 13 from using the software, which is a violation of the GPL license that Audacity uses.

Understandably, the policy changes have upset Audacity users, who have taken to Reddit and GitHub to question why an offline desktop app needs to "phone home" at all, and there is already discussion about forking Audacity into a separate open-source project that's free from the Muse Group's ownership and questionable data collection practices.

Popular Stories

Multicolored Low Cost A18 Pro MacBook Feature

Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo'

Tuesday March 3, 2026 7:00 am PST by
Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

Apple Announces $599 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip

Wednesday March 4, 2026 6:15 am PST by
Apple today announced the "MacBook Neo," an all-new kind of low-cost Mac featuring the A18 Pro chip for $599. The MacBook Neo is the first Mac to be powered by an iPhone chip; the A18 Pro debuted in 2024's iPhone 16 Pro models. Apple says it is up to 50% faster for everyday tasks than the bestselling PC with the latest shipping Intel Core Ultra 5, up to 3x faster for on-device AI workloads,...
MacBook Neo Feature Pastel 1

First MacBook Neo Benchmarks Are In: Here's How It Compares to the M1 MacBook Air

Thursday March 5, 2026 4:07 pm PST by
Benchmarks for the new MacBook Neo surfaced today, and unsurprisingly, CPU performance is almost identical to the iPhone 16 Pro. The MacBook Neo uses the same 6-core A18 Pro chip that was first introduced in the iPhone 16 Pro, but it has one fewer GPU core. The MacBook Neo earned a single-core score of 3461 and a multi-core score of 8668, along with a Metal score of 31286. Here's how the...

Top Rated Comments

Apple_Robert Avatar
61 months ago
Good on users for blowing the tech whistle. No excuse for this kind of crap.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago

It's getting to a point where I think I should have a VPN active all the time.
This would have no effect at all on this kind of issues. All a VPN can do is hide your traffic from your ISP, in exchange for making it visible to the VPN company: there's no practical effect on your privacy.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
spyguy10709 Avatar
61 months ago
I don't understand how GPL software could be "sold" in the first place?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago
You know what's happening here? The legal department of a big company is making them update the privacy policy to cover all eventualities of what could happen to the crash data. (Could it be subpoenaed? Sure … Let's add it then.)

The age 13 thing? That's them trying to avoid COPPA. They are not allowed to collect even crash reports in that case. They can't actually restrict the age (due to the GPL), so they literally ask (!) people under 13 not to use it.

But the outrage machine churns over the weekend before the company even has a chance to respond. I bet this is a big fat Nothing Burger (but those poor people in the PR department are in for a hell of a few days now). Can we just collectively wait a few days before going on the crusade …
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
61 months ago
Yep and these sheep are going to install it. That why we can’t have nice things in the US any more because humans are scumbags.

If I had that app installed I would remove it ASAP. If everyone did that than that company can go out of business. And I would not shred a tear.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Christoffee Avatar
61 months ago
It's getting to a point where I think I should have a VPN active all the time.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)