Audacity 'Spyware' Claims Follow Privacy Policy Changes By New Owner - MacRumors
Skip to Content

Audacity 'Spyware' Claims Follow Privacy Policy Changes By New Owner

audacityPopular open-source audio editing software Audacity is facing "spyware" allegations from users for recent privacy policy changes that suggest the desktop app is collecting user data and sharing it with third parties, including state regulators where applicable.

Two months ago, Audacity was acquired by Muse Group, which owns other audio-related projects including the Ultimate Guitar website and the MuseScore app. According to Fosspost, changes to the privacy policy section on the Audacity website indicate that several personal data collection mechanisms have since been added by the parent company.

The type of data collected now includes the computer's processor, operating system and version, the user's IP address, and any crash reports, fatal error codes and messages generated by their machine. More concerning perhaps is the inclusion of a vague section listing data that must be collected "for legal enforcement, litigation, and authorities' requests (if any)."

The storage of said data is located in servers in the U.S., Russia, and the European Economic Area. For example, IP addresses are stored in an identifiable way for a day before being hashed and then stored in servers for a year, leaving users identifiable via government data requests.

In addition, the new policy prevents people under the age of 13 from using the software, which is a violation of the GPL license that Audacity uses.

Understandably, the policy changes have upset Audacity users, who have taken to Reddit and GitHub to question why an offline desktop app needs to "phone home" at all, and there is already discussion about forking Audacity into a separate open-source project that's free from the Muse Group's ownership and questionable data collection practices.

Popular Stories

M5 Vision Pro Thumb 2

Apple Has Given Up on the Vision Pro After M5 Refresh Flop

Wednesday April 29, 2026 11:31 am PDT by
Apple has all but given up on the Vision Pro after the M5 model failed to revitalize interest in the device, MacRumors has learned. Apple updated the Vision Pro with a faster M5 chip and a more comfortable band in October 2025, but there were no other hardware changes, and consumers still weren't interested. The Vision Pro has been criticized for its high price tag and its uncomfortable...
Four iPhone 18 Pro Colors Mock Feature

iPhone 18 Pro to Launch in September With These 10 New Features

Tuesday April 28, 2026 9:35 am PDT by
While the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max are not launching until September, there are already plenty of rumors about the devices. It was initially reported that the iPhone 18 Pro models would have fully under-screen Face ID, with only a front camera visible in the top-left corner of the screen. However, the latest rumors indicate that only one Face ID component will be moved under the...
iphone 17e magsafe

Apple Reportedly Questioning Whether iPhone Should Drop MagSafe

Wednesday April 29, 2026 8:26 am PDT by
A leaker claims Apple is currently embroiled in an internal debate over whether MagSafe should remain a standard iPhone feature. The Weibo leaker known as "Instant Digital" says that when MagSafe was first introduced, the mood inside Apple was reportedly aggressive about its expansion. MagSafe for the iPhone was introduced with the iPhone 12 lineup in 2020, bringing a ring of magnets to the...

Top Rated Comments

Apple_Robert Avatar
63 months ago
Good on users for blowing the tech whistle. No excuse for this kind of crap.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
63 months ago

It's getting to a point where I think I should have a VPN active all the time.
This would have no effect at all on this kind of issues. All a VPN can do is hide your traffic from your ISP, in exchange for making it visible to the VPN company: there's no practical effect on your privacy.
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
spyguy10709 Avatar
63 months ago
I don't understand how GPL software could be "sold" in the first place?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
63 months ago
You know what's happening here? The legal department of a big company is making them update the privacy policy to cover all eventualities of what could happen to the crash data. (Could it be subpoenaed? Sure … Let's add it then.)

The age 13 thing? That's them trying to avoid COPPA. They are not allowed to collect even crash reports in that case. They can't actually restrict the age (due to the GPL), so they literally ask (!) people under 13 not to use it.

But the outrage machine churns over the weekend before the company even has a chance to respond. I bet this is a big fat Nothing Burger (but those poor people in the PR department are in for a hell of a few days now). Can we just collectively wait a few days before going on the crusade …
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
63 months ago
Yep and these sheep are going to install it. That why we can’t have nice things in the US any more because humans are scumbags.

If I had that app installed I would remove it ASAP. If everyone did that than that company can go out of business. And I would not shred a tear.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Christoffee Avatar
63 months ago
It's getting to a point where I think I should have a VPN active all the time.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)