U.S. International Trade Commission Declines to Block iPhone Imports in Ongoing Apple v. Qualcomm Case - MacRumors
Skip to Content

U.S. International Trade Commission Declines to Block iPhone Imports in Ongoing Apple v. Qualcomm Case

The United States International Trade Commission will not be blocking imports of the iPhone in the ongoing Apple v. Qualcomm case, reports Reuters.

Qualcomm had asked the ITC to ban imports of the AT&T and T-Mobile iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, and iPhone X models that use chips from Intel, citing multiple patent violations.

qualcomm iphone 7
Qualcomm did not ask for a ban on iPhones that use Qualcomm LTE chips, with the reasoning that a more limited exclusion order was more likely to be granted.

An ITC judge said on Friday that while Apple's iPhones infringe on a patent related to power management technology, a ban will not be put in place. The judge cited "public interest factors" as one of the reasons why the court ruled against Qualcomm.

Neither Apple nor Qualcomm have commented on the decision as of yet, but it marks a major victory for Apple in its months-long legal battle with Qualcomm.

The two companies have been embroiled in an increasingly tense legal feud that kicked off in January 2017. Qualcomm and Apple have filed several more than a dozen lawsuits against one another since then.

Apple has accused Qualcomm of charging unfair royalties for "technologies they have nothing to do with," while Qualcomm claims that its inventions form the "very core" of modern mobile communication.

Earlier this week, Qualcomm further escalated the dispute by accusing Apple of providing confidential trade information and trade secrets stolen from Qualcomm to Intel.

Popular Stories

General YouTube Feature Redux

Apple Sued by Three YouTube Channels

Monday April 6, 2026 8:53 am PDT by
Three established YouTube channels have sued Apple, alleging that the company violated the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by unlawfully accessing and scraping millions of copyrighted videos from YouTube to train its AI models. In a class action lawsuit filed in California federal court last week, the owners of the YouTube channels h3h3Productions (plus H3 Podcast and H3 Podcast ...
app store blue banner epic 1

Apple Asks Court to Pause App Store Fee Fight While It Petitions Supreme Court in Epic Games Case

Monday April 6, 2026 1:32 pm PDT by
Apple plans to ask the United States Supreme Court to weigh in on the App Store fee restrictions and contempt of court ruling levied against it in the ongoing Epic Games vs. Apple legal battle. In a filing on April 3 (via TechCrunch), Apple asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to hold off on a plan that would see the U.S. Northern District of California decide on a reasonable commission...
Apple Logo 16x9 US Flag Feature

Apple Subpoenas Samsung in South Korea Over DOJ Antitrust Case

Thursday April 9, 2026 4:20 am PDT by
Apple has asked a U.S. court to formally request internal Samsung documents from South Korea as part of discovery in the DOJ's ongoing antitrust lawsuit against the company. The DOJ filed suit against Apple in March 2024, alongside a number of governments, alleging the company used App Store rules, developer restrictions, and control over key iPhone features to stifle competition. After Apple...

Top Rated Comments

AngerDanger Avatar
99 months ago
I can't help but think of that terrible Batman v Superman film whenever I see the names of court cases anymore.



Attachment Image
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
velocityg4 Avatar
99 months ago
Sorry Qualcomm. Apple is now a big part of the US economy. As far as a single company is concerned anyway. Their sales and profit volume are too important. It would take a lot more than a simple patent dispute to convince the government to stop imports. Their net income is double your net sales. With Apple switching to Intel for their modems. Your net sales are going way down.

Even if Apple loses and has to pay. It will be many years from now. The victory will be a pyrrhic victory.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Quu Avatar
99 months ago
The judge cited "public interest factors" as one of the reasons why the court ruled against Qualcomm.
Aka the iPhone is too popular to block so we won't be doing that.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
djcerla Avatar
99 months ago
Common sense prevailed.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
99 months ago
‘Public interest factors’.. or in other words a US company in the US, [...]
Qualcomm is an US company, too. But probably not as popular as Apple. :)
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
zorinlynx Avatar
99 months ago
Aka the iPhone is too popular to block so we won't be doing that.
Not just that, the case is still ongoing. Why shouldn't Apple be able to continue to sell their product until the case is decided?

Once that happens, the court can award damages if there are any, etc. But while the case is ongoing, blocking imports is ludicrous.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)