New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

U.S. Department of Justice Files Appeal to Block AT&T and Time Warner Merger

A month after a judge approved AT&T's $85.4 billion purchase of Time Warner with no conditions, the United States Department of Justice has announced plans to appeal the merger's approval.


In a court document filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the DoJ announced its formal appeal. No additional data was included in the initial document.
Notice is hereby given that the United States of America, plaintiff in the above named case, appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from the final judgment entered in this action on June 12, 2018.
AT&T first announced its plan to purchase Time Warner in late 2017, but the acquisition was put on hold when the DoJ filed a lawsuit to put a stop to the merger based on the grounds that it would result in higher bills and fewer options for consumers.

A judge in June, however, ruled that the merger was legal, and while the Justice Department said it was disappointed in the court's ruling and would consider its next steps "in light of [its] commitment to preserving competition for the benefit of American consumers," it ultimately decided not to interfere with a stay at the time that the ruling was announced.

Just days after the judge's approval, AT&T completed its acquisition of Time Warner, but the DoJ is still able to appeal the decision even after the completion of the merger.

Shortly after the acquisition, AT&T announced a new WatchTV service that offers AT&T wireless subscribers under the new "AT&T Unlimited &More" and "AT&T Unlimited &More Premium" plans access to more than 30 live channels and 15,000 TV shows and movies on demand. These new plans are more expensive than AT&T's previous unlimited wireless plans, but includes WatchTV. On a standalone basis, WatchTV is $15 per month.


While AT&T said that its prices would not increase following the merger, it raised prices on its DirecTV Now plans by $5. AT&T also recently raised its administrative fees for postpaid wireless subscribers to $1.99, which some analysts have speculated is to make up for the expense of the Time Warner purchase.

Update: AT&T has released a statement on the DoJ's decision to appeal: "The Court's decision could hardly have been more thorough, fact-based, and well-reasoned. While the losing party in litigation always has the right to appeal if it wishes, we are surprised the DoJ has chosen to do so under these circumstances. We are ready to defend the court's decision at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals."



Top Rated Comments

(View all)

10 weeks ago
AT&T also recently raised its administrative fees ('//www.macrumors.com/2018/06/27/att-doubles-administrative-fees/') for postpaid wireless subscribers to $1.99, which some analysts have speculated is to make up for the expense of the Time Warner purchase.

AT&T to its customers - thanks, suckers.
Rating: 17 Votes
10 weeks ago
GREAT news.. it makes me have faith in the US government!
Rating: 13 Votes
10 weeks ago
Time Warner + ATT = TWATT

Doesn’t affect me, I don’t do business with either company.
Rating: 6 Votes
10 weeks ago
All this merging and acquisitions is part of the New World Order to take over the entire world. So corrupt that all these big corporations and government are controlled by the bankers of the world. I hope this deal doesn't go through. People need to do some research and get there news from independent sources instead of the mainstream media thats owned by these corrupt bankers that brainwashes people out there. We have a choice everyone. People need to wake up and realize what's going on in this world that the media doesn't you to know about.
Rating: 6 Votes
10 weeks ago
Someone really loves HBO the way it is.
Rating: 5 Votes
10 weeks ago

Double jeopardy only applies to individuals, not corporations.


And it only applies to criminal cases, not civil.
Rating: 5 Votes
10 weeks ago

This sounds unconstitutional to me... is this not Double Jeopardy? You can't take someone to court for the same thing twice.

Edit: I've changed my mind. Initially it was more of a hypothetical "will this lead to a monopoly?" and now they have new evidence more along the lines of "this is a monopoly".


Double jeopardy only applies to individuals, not corporations.
Rating: 4 Votes
10 weeks ago
I'm actually in agreement with this and I hope the DoJ wins. A company that creates content, distributes it, and is also a provider wields too much power IMO.
Rating: 3 Votes
10 weeks ago
This sounds unconstitutional to me... is this not Double Jeopardy? You can't take someone to court for the same thing twice.

Edit: I've changed my mind. Initially it was more of a hypothetical "will this lead to a monopoly?" and now they have new evidence more along the lines of "this is a monopoly".
Rating: 3 Votes
10 weeks ago
Wishful thinking - not just the Justice Department, all Americans.
Rating: 2 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]