New in OS X: Get MacRumors Push Notifications on your Mac

Resubscribe Now Close

ITC Rules in Favor of Apple, Older Samsung Products Facing Ban

The U.S. International Trade Commission today ordered an import ban against some Samsung products after finding that the company did infringe on two key Apple patents. The patents include the "Steve Jobs patent" that pertains to touchscreen technology and a patent that detects when a headset is plugged into a device.

Like the import ban that was levied against Apple and later vetoed, Samsung's import ban will take place after a 60-day Presidential review period. It is unlikely that Samsung will get the same presidential intervention, however, as Samsung's patent violations do not involve standard-essential patents. According to AllThingsD, Apple praised the court's decision.

apple_samsung_logos
"With today's decision, the ITC has joined courts around the world in Japan, Korea, Germany, Netherlands and California by standing up for innovation and rejecting Samsung's blatant copying of Apple's products," Apple said. "Protecting real innovation is what the patent system should be about."
This particular Apple vs. Samsung case began back in mid–2011, after Apple asked the ITC to investigate whether the South Korean company had infringed on a number of different patents. In addition to taking their case to the ITC, Samsung and Apple have fought in numerous courtrooms around the world since their dispute began.

The two have a number of other court battles coming in the months ahead, including an upcoming trial in November that will redetermine a portion of the damages that Samsung must pay Apple.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

18 months ago

WIll this also get Vetoed i wonder


No.

Apple doesn't use the shady tactic of using standard essential patents as a weapon.
Rating: 25 Votes
18 months ago

There is one and only one guilty party in whole this mess - it's Apple. They started it and they are winning it.


There, thought I'd fix that to match the article.
Rating: 19 Votes
18 months ago

If they are winning how come Samsung is now making more profits than Apple? Both companies scored exactly one ITC ban on outdated models. That's what Samsung wants - so far all these lawsuits did not prevent them from releasing innovative products and making profits in the process. Apple on the other hand... are not doing as well with iPhone market share dropping to 13% (far behind Samsung)


you still drunk with that absurd piece of garbage that people call article? :confused:
pls do a google search my friend...you will find how stupid that article was. im sure plenty of ppl will now post the links...
Rating: 15 Votes
18 months ago

(FRAND or not)


Ha ha well there's kind of a huge difference.

This guy. Samsung's work from home program must pay out pretty well.
Rating: 13 Votes
18 months ago

No.

Apple doesn't use the shady tactic of using standard essential patents as a weapon.


And by "shady" you mean the fact that Samsung is defending its patents (FRAND or not) which they are entitled to do, right?

There is one and only one guilty party in whole this mess - it's Apple. They started it and they are losing it.
Rating: 12 Votes
18 months ago

If they are winning how come Samsung is now making more profits than Apple? Both companies scored exactly one ITC ban on outdated models. That's what Samsung wants - so far all these lawsuits did not prevent them from releasing innovative products and making profits in the process. Apple on the other hand... are not doing as well with iPhone market share dropping to 13% (far behind Samsung)


I'd love to "not do well" as well as Apple does...

----------

Ha ha well there's kind of a huge difference.

This guy. Samsung's work from home program must pay out pretty well.


Clearly. I had to look at his comment twice to believe my eyes.
Rating: 9 Votes
18 months ago
There needs to be a ban on "bans".
Rating: 8 Votes
18 months ago
Starting to hate the word "innovate."
Rating: 8 Votes
18 months ago

Is this the article -- Strategy Analytics: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/strategy-analytics-samsung-becomes-worlds-most-profitable-handset-vendor-in-q2-2013-217059871.html (Strategy Analytics: Samsung Becomes World's Most Profitable Handset Vendor in Q2 2013) -- the one you're talking about?

Did you fail to read the Appleinsider article that thoroughly deconstructed that claim (http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/07/27/samsung-has-not-dethroned-apple-in-mobile-profits)? As Dilger notes in that article:



We'll add you to the list of individuals who were snookered by that fundamentally flawed analysis. :D

Ah I see, so an article that was picked up and reported on by several dozen highly regarded and professional news outlets were ALL wrong simply because one Apple fan website told you so?


Have you read Dilger's article? Did you step through his analysis? Do you have some specific challenge to the facts and reasoning that he presented?

In order for us to have an intelligent discussion on this topic, you're going to have to show us that you have actually read Dilger's article.
Rating: 8 Votes
18 months ago

You see, that's what I mean, you are already of the 'opinion' you were supplied cold hard facts because a website told you so, yet several dozen of the worlds top news outlets do not agree with you, unless they retracted their story's, which you haven't stated if they did.
No point in discussing the topic with yourself as it would go no where.


Oh brother, what a long way to say nothing at all. Again, he used SAMSUNG'S posted FINANCIALS in his article. Goodness man. He didn't make numbers up. He used numbers that Samsung themselves released in his article.

It is glaringly obvious that you have not one single shred of evidence to dispute even the flimsiest claims in Dilger's article. Seriously, just give it a rest with your martyr shtick.
Rating: 7 Votes

[ Read All Comments ]