Got a tip for us? Share it...

More TV Executives Weigh In on 99-Cent TV Show Rentals: Viacom Out, CBS on the Fence

The Wall Street Journal reports (subscription required) on additional comments about Apple's 99-cent TV show rental program made by executives at this week's Goldman Sachs conference. Over the past week, executives from Time Warner and NBC have weighed in with their opinions that the pricing model is not right for them, and executives from Viacom and CBS have now offered public statements regarding their companies' positions.

According to the report, Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman similarly cited the rental pricing as the primary issue, noting that it "doesn't work" for the media company that owns such cable channels as Comedy Central and Nickelodeon.

"The 99-cent rental is not a good price point," said Viacom Inc. Chief Executive Philippe Dauman at the conference, which was hosted by Goldman Sachs. "It doesn't work for us."

Mr. Dauman noted that Viacom, which owns cable networks like Comedy Central and Nickelodeon, invests heavily to produce its content and plans to increase that investment.

"We value our content a lot," he said. "We don't think Apple has it quite right yet."

Les Moonves, CEO of CBS, offered a glimmer of hope, however, that his company might be open to participating in the program down the road, indicating that he is taking a wait-and-see attitude.

"What we said to them - and the Apple guys are terrific and obviously the application is terrific - is let us see what happens," Mr. Moonves said. "There are two networks in and two networks not in. Let's see what happens and maybe we'll talk again in January, maybe we'll talk again next year."

For the time being, ABC and Fox remain the only two participants in the rental program being promoted alongside the new Apple TV set to launch in the very near future. Both companies have aligned themselves closely with Apple, as Apple CEO Steve Jobs is the largest individual shareholder of ABC parent Disney while Fox and its parent News Corp have been said to be aggressively courting Apple in attempting to gain a foothold on the rapidly-expanding digital content and tablet markets.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

22 months ago
Wow, this is retarded! Why don't they provide the $1.99 version for RENT OR a free version with commercials in it or iAds or something to get them the revenues the want.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago

Wow, this is retarded! Why don't they provide the $1.99 version for RENT OR a free version with commercials in it or iAds or something to get them the revenues the want.

How about 100% of the profits? Im sure Apple can afford it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
"We value our content a lot," he said. "We don't think Apple has it quite right yet."

Just keep waiting like you have been. Wait until you are finally extinct.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
So these same companies will put content on places like Hulu, or other free streaming sites with ads, but won't put it up were they are getting direct financial compensation?

In other words they are saying..." our shows are not popular enough to generate enough rental revenue" .

Possibly not, but I have a feeling that networks like this are slowly going under. Honestly, there is enough good content on YouTube (or similar) by "amateur hour" folks, that I haven't felt the need to renew my cable subscription for almost decade.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
I'm going to guess a scenario.
Maybe Apple does this intentionally. Google TV is going to be able to run apps. What if the actual content creators start taking advantage of that, making their own apps, bypassing the networks/middlemen altogether. The networks might see that as a larger threat, and then sign up with Apple to hold whatever control they still have. Once Apple gets everybody, then Apple flips on the apps switch on Apple TV, leaving the networks scrambling. Apple will become THE "network" for iptv. :D
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
I really don't understand what these execs are thinking. Renting for $.99 is likely going to make them more money than having people buy episodes at $2.99 or $1.99 a pop, because more people are likely to rent than buy. I personally don't buy tv shows because the chances of me ever watching them again are slim. But if I miss something on television I might consider renting it for $.99, or even getting a whole season via rental that way. Now, if I get into a new tv show and want to watch the whole season I just put it on my Netflix queue. Buying a whole season of a program - especially those with 20+ episodes - is damn expensive.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
What Apple needs to do to make Apple TV and rentals a success is to make networks join up. They should do this by saying to any network that doesn't agree is that if you don't sell rentals you're off the store and tell fox if they like the iPad then to put all their shows up. That's the only way rentals will successful otherwise get NC up and running then stream purchased shows over.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
I wonder what the worth of a single viewer is in commercial sales revenue to the networks. If the consumer wants to pick up the that tab in order to not be subjected to commercials I don't see why it matters. I believe like many others on this forum that the networks are afraid of their business model crumpling before their eyes. Gotta love capitalism!
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
Seriously, I feel bad for the people who waste their life watching television.
Television, stunting human momentum since 1938. :(

Oh, and Fox sucks.


---
Go 
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
22 months ago
I'm not a fan of network TV, so I would find it very funny if this thing took off and left these guys in the dust. If so, I think Apple should make them pay dearly to be incuded at a later date.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]