Got a tip for us? Share it...

Associated Press Announces Plans for iPad Application


The Associated Press today announced plans to create a new business unit known as "AP Gateway" that will focus on mobile platforms, with an application for Apple's iPad tablet device set to serve as the launch product from the division. AP Gateway will also seek to leverage the technology behind its iPad application to assist its local news affiliates with creating packages of their own content.

It appears likely that the application will require a paid subscription as the new organization continues its attempts to monetize mobile distribution of its content, although an AP executive suggested that it may appear as a free application at first.

The group already has drawn up plans to charge for an application designed for the iPad, a 1.5-pound tablet computer that Apple Inc. is scheduled to release at the end of March. The price of the application has yet to be determined, although it might start free, according to Jane Seagrave, a senior vice president who becomes the AP's chief revenue officer Monday.

Much like the AP Mobile news product, the iPad app will show custom packages of headlines, stories, photos and video from the AP and from newspapers and broadcasters that choose to contribute their content and share the revenue. AP members also could use the same system to offer their own iPad apps that show their own content.

Attempts to bring newspaper content to the iPad have hit a few hurdles as the device's launch approaches with internal units of The New York Times reportedly vying for control over the distribution and disagreeing over pricing for the newspaper's content. Newspaper and magazine publishers have also been expressing concern over revenue sharing with Apple and the company's unwillingness to share subscriber information that publishers depend on for marketing and tailoring their content.

Top Rated Comments

(View all)

26 months ago
I'm all for content providers trying out the subscription model (NYT, AP, WSJ, etc)... If people are looking for a replacement for newspapers, they may actually pay for it. I have no doubt people will pay for magazine subscriptions on the iPad.

Personally, I'll still use CNN or other free websites / apps for my news. Or I'll use aggregators (Fark.com, for example)... I'd imagine it will be 100:1 free -vs- paid, but content organizations deserve to get paid (be it through subscriptions or advertising).

We'll see how this plays out.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
I can see a lot of other media agencies following in a similar path.

Many more to come.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
I hope it isn't going to take 1 to 2 minutes to launch, like the iPhone version does.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
The AP app for iPhone is total garbage. Takes for ever to load, push notifies non important stories, and crashes all the time. I'd never pay for such a garbage app. The Engadget app is where it's at. Perfect. Loads in seconds.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
Paid subscription? No thanks.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
Although the iPhone app does have issues, my gut tells me that this app might get some assistance from Jobs and team to ensure it looks and ACTS nice. Jobs is trying to put the iPad between the phone and notebook computer.

He is not going to want the initial apps to perform poorly especially something specifically in the news and reading arena that he spoke to at the release.

My gut tells me this app will get help and be quite good.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
I still can't decide whether it's better for all these newspaper and magazine publishers to create their own apps and formats, or if it'd be a better experience for Apple to enforce a standard, unified format and run everything through iTunes. I can see it being a kind of fragmented, messy experience with a lot of different apps, unique UIs for each piece of content, maintaining different accounts with each provider, etc.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
Whatever happened to the iTunes delivery network, the standardized publishing format, the one-store-for-all-media concept? I'm going to need a separate App for everything I subscribe to? Is this seriously what is supposed to reinvent the print industry?

What is it about the iPad that makes this possible? Why doesn't every newspaper and magazine write a custom app for any computer to access paid content?

Hey, print industry, the concept that was about to save your slumping subscriptions was a unified delivery system backed by millions of paying customers! This idea of one publisher, yet another "app" is absurd. Best of luck to you, but I'm not buying it.
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
I live your sign-off. Absolutely! Get outside and see the view. Many would be surprised these days! I go outside all the time and shoot photos.

You are true. I guess there is a tradeoff between a common GUI that presents a user experience that is similar and the variability that an uncommon GUI provides to the publisher. That is a hard one.

Overall. I would vote for uncommon GUIs at the discretion of the company/organization. If I don't like one, I'll move to another! ;)
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives
26 months ago
My takeaway from the article is not access to viewing content, but iPad as a tool to capture, edit and send content from a variety of places. Basically a portable iMovie workstation and content injest station. It may only be able to display 1024x768, but there is nothing keeping it from EDITING 1080p HD. Slooowwly.

Rocketman
Rating: 0 Positives / 0 Negatives

[ Read All Comments ]